CVE WatchJul 14, 2026

CVE-2024-23682

Artemis Java Test Sandbox versions before 1.8.0 are vulnerable to a sandbox escape when an attacker includes class files in a package that A

CVSS

8.2

High

EPSS

0.4%

p28

KEV

—

Exploit Today

0-100

Published: Jan 19, 2024 · Last modified: Jul 14, 2026 · CWE-501 · CWE-653

EPSS · 30d

0.4%EPSS · 30 days0.4%

2026-08-182026-09-15

Technical description

Artemis Java Test Sandbox versions before 1.8.0 are vulnerable to a sandbox escape when an attacker includes class files in a package that Ares trusts. An attacker can abuse this issue to execute arbitrary Java when a victim executes the supposedly sandboxed code.

Official references

Related CVEs

CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTitleMod.

CVE-2026-829648.8 HIG

—

———Improper preservation of permissions in the Avast sandbox minifilter driver (aswSnx.sys) on Windows allows a local, low-privileged attacker executing inside the sandbox to escape file isolation and escalate to SYSTEM. When the sandbox virtualizes a file it copies the original security descriptor, but the driver opened the virtualization target object with GENERIC_WRITE and FILE_WRITE_ATTRIBUTES only, omitting WRITE_DAC. Every attempt to apply the original DACL therefore failed, and the failure was discarded silently, leaving virtualized copies of sensitive files with permissive permissions. Because the IRP_MJ_CREATE callback additionally did not strip WRITE_DAC for sensitive directories, a sandboxed process could rewrite the security descriptor of a virtualized object, read the virtualized copy of the SAM database, extract local NTLM password hashes and execute code as SYSTEM. The absence of an IRP_MJ_SET_SECURITY callback in the driver's operation registration table is a related defense-in-depth gap, but it is not the control that prevents this attack.5h CVE-2026-571357.6 HIG

34.7%

——10PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. From 1.2.3 until 1.7.2, SandboxExecutor network-isolated mode in src/praisonai-ts/src/cli/features/sandbox-executor.ts uses buildEnv() only to inject invalid http_proxy and https_proxy environment variables and does not establish an operating-system network boundary. Programs that ignore those proxy variables can open sockets directly, allowing supposedly isolated commands to reach localhost, internal services, cloud metadata, or external hosts and potentially exfiltrate data. An initial remediation was released in version 1.7.2.1d CVE-2026-542486.5 MED

13.9%

——4Doco-CD is a GitOps continuous delivery tool that automatically deploys and updates Docker Compose projects/services and Swarm stacks. Prior to version 0.90.1, a trust-boundary flaw in OCI artifact verification allowed artifact-provided deployment config to influence the policy used to verify that same artifact. When global OCI signature verification was enabled via `OCI_TRUST_POLICY` (`enabled: true`), an attacker with write access to the configured OCI tag could publish an unsigned or improperly signed artifact containing `.doco-cd.yml` with `oci.verify: false`. This could cause signature verification to be bypassed and untrusted deployment content to be applied. This primarily impacts users deploying from OCI artifacts where deployment config is read from artifact contents (for example, poll/webhook flows without trusted inline deployment overrides). The issue is fixed by enforcing a strict trust boundary and no-downgrade behavior. First, artifact-contained `.doco-cd.yml` is treated as untrusted for OCI trust-policy override decisions. Second, if global `OCI_TRUST_POLICY.enabled` is `true`, per-deployment `oci.verify: false` cannot disable verification. Some workarounds are available. Do not source deployment config from untrusted OCI artifact contents. Use trusted inline `POLL_CONFIG.deployments` and avoid relying on artifact-contained trust-policy overrides. Restrict write/push permissions for OCI repositories/tags used by doco-cd. Prefer immutable digest pinning and protected release/tag workflows. Monitor for unexpected artifact digest changes and failed/suspicious verification events.2d CVE-2026-15366—

10.6%

——3A control logic defect in a specific built-in webpage of Kids Mode allows users to view local gallery photos directly within the page19d CVE-2026-71325—

3.1%

——1Traefik is an open-source edge router that makes publishing services a fun and easy experience. Prior to 2.11.54, 3.6.25, and 3.7.10, cross-namespace @kubernetescrd references are not rejected for TraefikService backend references resolved by the service resolver. A tenant confined by RBAC to a single namespace can therefore bind its own router to a TraefikService owned by another namespace and expose or reroute that namespace's backend, defeating the namespace isolation allowCrossNamespace=false is meant to enforce. This issue is fixed in version 2.11.54, 3.6.25, 3.7.10.8d CVE-2026-622468.5 HIG

19.1%

——6Kamaji is the Hosted Control Plane Manager for Kubernetes. Prior to 26.7.4-edge, Kamaji derives a TenantControlPlane datastore schema, database user, and etcd key prefix from a lossy namespace-and-name normalization in GetDefaultDatastoreSchema() and GetDefaultDatastoreUsername(), allowing distinct tenants with colliding normalized identifiers to share control-plane state and read, modify, or destroy another tenant's Kubernetes data. This issue is fixed in version 26.7.4-edge.8d