PULSE
FEED
ransomemperador reclama a MAA Group Consulting Engineers · Professional Servicesransomrhysida reclama a ClaimTek Systems · Financial Servicesransomlockbit5 reclama a xspringcapital.com · SG · Financial Servicesransomlockbit5 reclama a susannecerda.com · MXransomanubis reclama a Santiam Hospital & Clinics · US · Healthcareransomsilentransomgroup reclama a Lowenstein Sandler LLP · US · Professional Servicesransompear reclama a Cyrious Software · US · Technologyransomwallstreet reclama a Fortrex · US · Manufacturingransomsilentransomgroup reclama a Morrison Foerster · US · Professional Servicesransomsilentransomgroup reclama a T... E...ransomsilentransomgroup reclama a S... H...ransomgenesis reclama a A&B Lab · US · Otherransomglobal secret group reclama a The Anglican International School · IL · Educationransompanzer reclama a PQE Group · Professional Servicesransomemperador reclama a MAA Group Consulting Engineers · Professional Servicesransomrhysida reclama a ClaimTek Systems · Financial Servicesransomlockbit5 reclama a xspringcapital.com · SG · Financial Servicesransomlockbit5 reclama a susannecerda.com · MXransomanubis reclama a Santiam Hospital & Clinics · US · Healthcareransomsilentransomgroup reclama a Lowenstein Sandler LLP · US · Professional Servicesransompear reclama a Cyrious Software · US · Technologyransomwallstreet reclama a Fortrex · US · Manufacturingransomsilentransomgroup reclama a Morrison Foerster · US · Professional Servicesransomsilentransomgroup reclama a T... E...ransomsilentransomgroup reclama a S... H...ransomgenesis reclama a A&B Lab · US · Otherransomglobal secret group reclama a The Anglican International School · IL · Educationransompanzer reclama a PQE Group · Professional Services
← All CVEs
CVE WatchOct 18, 2026

CVE-2025-6298

ACAP applications can gain elevated privileges due to improper input validation, potentially leading to privilege escalation. This vulnerabi

CVSS

6.7

Medium

EPSS

0.1%

p4

KEV

—

Exploit Today

1

0-100

Published: Nov 11, 2025 · Last modified: Oct 18, 2026 · CWE-1287

EPSS · 30d
0.1%EPSS · 30 days0.1%
2026-09-302026-10-28
Technical description

ACAP applications can gain elevated privileges due to improper input validation, potentially leading to privilege escalation. This vulnerability can only be exploited if the Axis device is configured to allow the installation of unsigned ACAP applications, and if an attacker convinces the victim to install a malicious ACAP application.

Official references
Related CVEs
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTitleMod.
CVE-2026-110985—
—
——0A Kafka broker using SASL/OAUTHBEARER with the default validator (sasl.oauthbearer.jwt.validator.class=DefaultJwtValidator) selects its implementation from configuration. When sasl.oauthbearer.jwks.endpoint.url is set, the validator verifies the JWT signature. When that URL is unset (the default) and no verification key resolver is supplied, DefaultJwtValidator silently falls back to ClientJwtValidator, which does not verify the JWT signature, algorithm, or issuer - and the broker starts with no warning or error. This is the residual of CVE-2026-33557, whose fix restored signature verification only on the path where the JWKS endpoint URL is set. Impact: A broker in this state accepts any structurally valid JWT, including "alg":"none" tokens. An unauthenticated remote attacker who can reach the listener can forge a token asserting any principal - including configured superusers - and gain full access to the cluster. Only brokers that enable SASL/OAUTHBEARER validation without a JWKS endpoint URL (and without a custom verification key resolver) are affected; brokers that set the URL verify signatures and are not affected. Unlike CVE-2026-110952 (issuer/audience not enforced by default), here no signature is verified at all. Mitigation (all affected versions, no upgrade required): Set sasl.oauthbearer.jwks.endpoint.url for every listener/mechanism that uses OAuthBearerValidatorCallbackHandler, or configure a signature-verifying sasl.oauthbearer.jwt.validator.class. Resolution: From Apache Kafka 4.2.2, 4.3.1, and 4.4.0: a broker that would fall back to the non-verifying ClientJwtValidator fails to start with a ConfigException instead of running without signature verification (secure by default).23h
CVE-2026-904585.4 MED
20.1%
——6OpenStack Ironic before 39.0.1 allows DELETE and GET via vendor_passthru, e.g., to delete accounts from the BMC's Redfish service.6d
CVE-2026-1153834.8 MED
7.9%
——2Wasmtime 47.0.0 before 48.0.4 and 49.0.0 before 49.0.2 contains an improper validation vulnerability that accepts components whose core modules import WebAssembly tags with a subtype of the original type. Malicious guests can mis-type exception object payloads to corrupt the GC heap, causing Wasmtime to panic when the exceptions proposal is enabled.7d
CVE-2026-114509—
55.7%
——17Laravel is a web application framework. Prior to 12.68.0 and 13.29.0, TokenGuard configured as a standard token-based API guard does not reject a crafted non-string credential. Under affected MySQL or MariaDB configurations, the authentication lookup can match an unintended existing user, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to bypass authentication and take over an account on routes protected by TokenGuard. This issue is fixed in versions 12.68.0 and 13.29.0.21h
CVE-2026-1108577.5 HIG
35.8%
——11GitPython before 3.2.0 contains a remote code execution vulnerability that allows attackers to run commands because Git.ls_remote forwards URLs without check_unsafe_protocols validation. Attackers can supply ext:: remote-helper URLs to execute commands when git permits the ext transport, while merge_base and IndexFile.move also accept unguarded option injection.14d
CVE-2026-978017.5 HIG
54.3%
——16Improper validation of specified type of input in .NET Framework allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.16d