PULSE
FEED
ransomn0n reclama a Company #98 · ET · Not Foundransomn0n reclama a Company #97 · TN · Not Foundransomn0n reclama a Company #96 · TT · Not Foundransomn0n reclama a Company #95 · CH · Not Foundransomanubis reclama a Fisher59 · Not Foundransompayload reclama a BW Office World · Retail & E-Commerceransompayload reclama a Brüninghoff Group · DE · Manufacturingransomglobal secret group reclama a Rosenberg & Pittinsky · US · Professional Servicesransomqilin reclama a Toyota Canarias · ES · Transportationransomlockbit5 reclama a chooseultimate.com · US · Retail & E-Commerceransomredact reclama a Baker Donelson · US · Professional Servicesransomn0n reclama a Vormittag Associates Inc · US · Not Foundransomglobal secret group reclama a Seminole Schools · US · Educationransomn0n reclama a Froggys Fog · US · Retail & E-Commerceransomn0n reclama a Company #98 · ET · Not Foundransomn0n reclama a Company #97 · TN · Not Foundransomn0n reclama a Company #96 · TT · Not Foundransomn0n reclama a Company #95 · CH · Not Foundransomanubis reclama a Fisher59 · Not Foundransompayload reclama a BW Office World · Retail & E-Commerceransompayload reclama a Brüninghoff Group · DE · Manufacturingransomglobal secret group reclama a Rosenberg & Pittinsky · US · Professional Servicesransomqilin reclama a Toyota Canarias · ES · Transportationransomlockbit5 reclama a chooseultimate.com · US · Retail & E-Commerceransomredact reclama a Baker Donelson · US · Professional Servicesransomn0n reclama a Vormittag Associates Inc · US · Not Foundransomglobal secret group reclama a Seminole Schools · US · Educationransomn0n reclama a Froggys Fog · US · Retail & E-Commerce
← All CVEs
CVE WatchOct 16, 2026

CVE-2026-105660

Improper Validation of Syntactic Correctness of Input vulnerability in mtrudel bandit allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to set conn.

CVSS

—

No CVSS

EPSS

0.5%

p40

KEV

—

Exploit Today

12

0-100

Published: Oct 15, 2026 · Last modified: Oct 16, 2026 · CWE-1286

EPSS · 30d
0.5%EPSS · 30 days0.5%
2026-10-162026-10-19
Technical description

Improper Validation of Syntactic Correctness of Input vulnerability in mtrudel bandit allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to set conn.host and conn.port to values outside the RFC 3986 host grammar via the authority of an HTTP/1 absolute-form or authority-form request target. Bandit validates the Host header and answers 400 when it is malformed, but when the request target carries its own authority that authority takes precedence, as RFC 9112 requires, and Bandit.Pipeline.determine_host_and_port!/4 in lib/bandit/pipeline.ex passes it to the application unchecked. A request line such as GET http://good.example@evil.example/x HTTP/1.1 with a valid Host header yields a conn.host of good.example@evil.example, and the same path admits NUL, DEL and non-ASCII bytes, invalid IP literals and ports outside 1..65535. The HTTP/1.0 clause needs no Host header at all, and CONNECT places the unparsed port string in conn.port. Applications that build absolute URLs from conn.host, such as through Plug.Conn.request_url/1 or Phoenix URL helpers, emit links whose authority the attacker chose. Message framing is unaffected, and no CR or LF can reach conn.host. This issue affects bandit: from 0.6.0 before 1.13.0.

Official references
Related CVEs
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTitleMod.
CVE-2026-110675—
—
——0Cpanel::JSON::XS versions from 4.33 before 4.80 for Perl accept malformed UTF-8 in bare hash keys under allow_barekey in decode_hv. With utf8 and allow_barekey, which relaxed enables, a quoted key is validated as UTF-8 but a bare key's bytes are stored as a UTF-8 flagged string without any check. Malformed UTF-8, control bytes and backslashes reach the decoded hash, while malformed UTF-8 and control bytes in a quoted key or a value are rejected. Later operations on the key, including lc, uc or encoding the hash again, die with a malformed UTF-8 error.18h
CVE-2026-110759—
8.3%
——3Text::CSV_XS versions before 1.65 for Perl return a 0xFF byte that is not in the input for an empty last field followed by a lone CR in parse. When the input to parse ends in a separator and a lone CR, the parser treats the end of the input as the next character and stores the end-of-file marker in the field as the byte 0xFF. With binary set, parse("a,\r") returns the fields "a" and "\xFF". On UTF-8 flagged input the last field is a UTF-8 flagged string holding that lone byte, which is malformed UTF-8. The same input with a non-empty last field is rejected as an error. A CRLF file read line by line and chomped ends this way when its last column is empty, so the application receives a byte that is not in its input.18h
CVE-2026-67418—
32.7%
——10RabbitMQ is a messaging and streaming broker. From 3.13.0 until 3.13.19, 4.0.24, 4.1.15, 4.2.10, and 4.3.5, the MQTT 5 parser in deps/rabbitmq_mqtt/src/rabbit_mqtt_packet.erl accepts Request-Problem-Information on PUBLISH packets even though the property is valid only for CONNECT. An authenticated publisher with topic write permission can cause the broker to store and route that inapplicable property to a separately authenticated matching subscriber. When the subscriber path serializes the outbound PUBLISH, serialise_prop/2 has no matching clause, and the uncontained function_clause exception closes the victim MQTT or Web MQTT connection. The publisher connection and broker remain available, and queued replay, retained-message persistence, and broker-wide denial of service were not established. This issue is fixed in versions 3.13.19, 4.0.24, 4.1.15, 4.2.10, and 4.3.5.4d
CVE-2026-1020848.1 HIG
42.2%
——13An Improper Validation of Syntactic Correctness of Input vulnerability in the VPN daemon of Juniper Networks Junos OS on SRX Series allows an authenticated, network-based attacker to take complete control of the device. If an SRX device configured for AutoDiscovery VPN (ADVPN) receives a message from a peer that contains one or more specifically malformed attributes, this will cause a buffer overflow, which can allow remote code execution and therefore allow an attacker to take complete control of the device. To be able to carry out this attack an attacker must either have acquired the shared secret to impersonate a peer or have compromised an existing one, so this attack is considerably difficult. This issue affects Junos OS on SRX Series: * All versions before 23.2R2-S7.7; * from 23.4 before 23.4R2-S7; * from 24.2 before 24.2R2-S4; * from 24.4 before 24.4R2-S3; * from 25.2 before 25.2R2; * from 25.4 before 25.4R1-S3.5d
CVE-2026-837288.8 HIG
14.8%
——4Improper validation of syntactic correctness of input in Windows Hyper-V allows an authorized attacker to perform spoofing locally.4d
CVE-2026-1094255.3 MED
8.4%
——3Tink-go (tink-crypto/tink-go) through 2.8.0 contains an input-validation vulnerability where keyset.NewHandleWithNoSecrets() and ReadWithNoSecrets() skip the structural Validate() step before constructing a keyset.Handle, allowing malformed public or no-secret keysets that violate Tink's keyset invariants to be accepted. Attackers can supply a malformed keyset, such as one with an enabled public key lacking a valid primary key or a DESTROYED key with no KeyData, causing inconsistent downstream validation where functions like jwt.JWKSetFromPublicKeysetHandle() process the invalid handle and produce a JWK set, potentially misleading applications that rely on successful handle construction as proof of keyset integrity.4d