PULSE
FEED
ransomnightspire reclama a REFSA S.A. · AR · Otherransomsilentransomgroup reclama a S... G...ransomqilin reclama a Isapre Consalud · CL · Healthcareransomorova reclama a Harry's International · SG · Retail & E-Commerceransomeverstake reclama a da*****t.com · Technologyransomeverstake reclama a ra*****g.comransomredact reclama a Holland & Knight · US · Professional Servicesransomqilin reclama a Astino Berhad · MY · Manufacturingransomakira reclama a Princeton Management · Financial Servicesransomakira reclama a Usnextransomakira reclama a Howells Motor Freight · US · Transportationransomsafepay reclama a deom.be · BEransomhyflock reclama a Ateşsan Ambalaj · TR · Manufacturingransompear reclama a Neiman & Company, Inc. · US · Financial Servicesransomnightspire reclama a REFSA S.A. · AR · Otherransomsilentransomgroup reclama a S... G...ransomqilin reclama a Isapre Consalud · CL · Healthcareransomorova reclama a Harry's International · SG · Retail & E-Commerceransomeverstake reclama a da*****t.com · Technologyransomeverstake reclama a ra*****g.comransomredact reclama a Holland & Knight · US · Professional Servicesransomqilin reclama a Astino Berhad · MY · Manufacturingransomakira reclama a Princeton Management · Financial Servicesransomakira reclama a Usnextransomakira reclama a Howells Motor Freight · US · Transportationransomsafepay reclama a deom.be · BEransomhyflock reclama a Ateşsan Ambalaj · TR · Manufacturingransompear reclama a Neiman & Company, Inc. · US · Financial Services
← All CVEs
CVE WatchNov 2, 2026

CVE-2026-106807

A denial-of-service vulnerability exists in open5GS v2.8.0 in the PFCP transaction handling path. When the PFCP transaction or timer resourc

CVSS

—

No CVSS

EPSS

—

KEV

—

Exploit Today

—

0-100

Published: Nov 2, 2026 · Last modified: Nov 2, 2026

EPSS · 30d

Not enough EPSS history yet.

Technical description

A denial-of-service vulnerability exists in open5GS v2.8.0 in the PFCP transaction handling path. When the PFCP transaction or timer resource pool is exhausted, ogs_pfcp_xact_remote_create() returns NULL, but the failure is not handled properly and leads to an ogs_assert(new) failure in ogs_pfcp_xact_receive(). An attacker able to send PFCP messages to the affected SMF/UPF can exhaust transaction resources and cause the network function process to terminate with SIGABRT, resulting in service disruption and preventing further session establishment until the affected component is restarted.

Official references
Related CVEs

No related CVEs by CWE or product.