PULSE
FEED
ransomwhitearmor reclama a Gamdom · Otherransomfalcon reclama a Beasley Allen Law Firm · US · Professional Servicesransomqilin reclama a RaceTrakka · AU · Retail & E-Commerceransomqilin reclama a Smith Feddeler & Smith · US · Professional Servicesransomqilin reclama a Delta Electric Power Association · US · Energy & Utilitiesransomqilin reclama a Bangor Wholesale Laminates · GB · Manufacturingransomqilin reclama a TeleTronic · ES · Technologyransomqilin reclama a FIRMENGRUPPE APPL Holding GmbH · DE · Otherransomqilin reclama a Premier Medical Group · US · Healthcareransomqilin reclama a Zachary Confections · US · Retail & E-Commerceransomqilin reclama a THOMAS JORDAN, P.A · US · Professional Servicesransomqilin reclama a Five Star Sheets · US · Retail & E-Commerceransomqilin reclama a Power Funding · GB · Financial Servicesransomqilin reclama a Mountain Rheumatology · US · Healthcareransomwhitearmor reclama a Gamdom · Otherransomfalcon reclama a Beasley Allen Law Firm · US · Professional Servicesransomqilin reclama a RaceTrakka · AU · Retail & E-Commerceransomqilin reclama a Smith Feddeler & Smith · US · Professional Servicesransomqilin reclama a Delta Electric Power Association · US · Energy & Utilitiesransomqilin reclama a Bangor Wholesale Laminates · GB · Manufacturingransomqilin reclama a TeleTronic · ES · Technologyransomqilin reclama a FIRMENGRUPPE APPL Holding GmbH · DE · Otherransomqilin reclama a Premier Medical Group · US · Healthcareransomqilin reclama a Zachary Confections · US · Retail & E-Commerceransomqilin reclama a THOMAS JORDAN, P.A · US · Professional Servicesransomqilin reclama a Five Star Sheets · US · Retail & E-Commerceransomqilin reclama a Power Funding · GB · Financial Servicesransomqilin reclama a Mountain Rheumatology · US · Healthcare
← All CVEs
CVE WatchOct 8, 2026

CVE-2026-107587

Improper certificate validation in the webmail of Progressive Robot hMailServer 6.3.2 through 6.3.5 allows a remote unauthenticated attacker

CVSS

5.9

Medium

EPSS

0.2%

p6

KEV

—

Exploit Today

2

0-100

Published: Oct 8, 2026 · Last modified: Oct 8, 2026 · CWE-295

EPSS · 30d
0.2%EPSS · 30 days0.2%
2026-10-092026-10-25
Technical description

Improper certificate validation in the webmail of Progressive Robot hMailServer 6.3.2 through 6.3.5 allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to have S/MIME-encrypted mail that the account later sends to another correspondent also encrypted to the attacker's key. When its recipient opened a signed message, the webmail kept the signer's certificate for encrypting replies whether or not the server found its chain trusted, under the first e-mail address the certificate listed rather than the message's From address, and beside any certificate already held for that address. Encrypted mail later sent from the webmail to that address was encrypted to every certificate held for it, so a holder of the kept certificate's key who obtains a copy of such a message can read it.

Official references
Related CVEs
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTitleMod.
CVE-2026-1159306.8 MED
—
———The MongoDB Shell (mongosh) relies on Node.js as a third-party runtime that carries its own TLS root certificate store. This certificate store has the recoverable eMudhra intermediate CA certificates. This issue impacts MongoDB Shell (mongosh) versions prior to 2.14.0 and can be resolved by updating to mongosh 2.14.0 which bundles Node.js 24.22.1 or later. If mongosh is installed through npm, it uses the Node.js runtime installed on the host; update that runtime separately.7h
CVE-2026-115693—
—
———Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability in hackney_ssl in benoitc hackney allows an on-path attacker to impersonate a server pinned to a private certificate authority via a certificate chain that ends in a publicly trusted root. hackney adds {partial_chain, fun hackney_ssl:partial_chain/1} to every verify_peer configuration. The callback returns any certificate in the peer chain whose public key matches a root in the bundled certifi store as the trust anchor, and OTP honours that callback over the configured cacerts. hackney_ssl:merge_ssl_opts/3 kept the callback when the caller replaced the trust store with cacerts or cacertfile in ssl_options, so a connection pinned to a private CA still accepted any chain that carried a publicly trusted root. The hostname check still applies, so the attacker needs a publicly trusted certificate for the pinned hostname. This issue affects hackney: from 1.24.0 before 4.9.0.6h
CVE-2026-1159963.7 LOW
13.9%
——4A vulnerability was detected in Unitree Robotics Unitree Go2 up to 1.1.13/1.1.14.1/1.1.15.1. This affects the function WebSocketClient.connect of the file websocket.py of the component chat_go. Performing a manipulation results in improper certificate validation. The attack may be initiated remotely. The attack's complexity is rated as high. The exploitability is reported as difficult. The vendor confirmed early: "These issues were previously submitted by the researcher through our Security Response Center platform and are tracked internally as follows: Submission 990504 corresponds to our internal ticket #616 (Go2 chat_go WSS client disabled TLS server certificate validation, CWE-295)."10h
CVE-2026-1159296.8 MED
8.3%
——2MongoDB Compass relies on Electron, a third-party runtime that carries its own TLS root certificate store. This root certificate store has the recoverable eMudhra intermediate CA certificates. Issue is resolved by updating to Compass 1.53.1, which includes Electron 44.9.1.7h
CVE-2026-1060726.7 MED
45.6%
——14A flaw in Node.js TLS hostname verification allows a certificate with only a DNS SAN to authenticate an IP endpoint when the client connects using a non-canonical IPv4 spelling, such as `0177.0.0.1`, `0x7f.0.0.1`, `2130706433` or `127.1`. `tls.checkServerIdentity()` did not classify these hosts as IP addresses, but normalized them to their canonical form and matched the result against the certificate DNS names. A certificate containing `DNS:127.0.0.1` and no `IP Address:127.0.0.1` SAN was therefore accepted, while the same certificate is correctly rejected for `127.0.0.1`. Exploitation requires a certificate with a numeric DNS SAN issued by a CA trusted by the client, and a platform resolver that accepts these spellings, such as glibc. This vulnerability affects Node.js **26.x**, **24.x**, and **22.x**.3d
CVE-2026-1060697.4 HIG
19.8%
——6A flaw in Node.js TLS hostname verification can cause a server certificate to be validated against a different IP address than the one the client connected to, when the host is a non-canonical IPv4 literal with a leading zero, such as `0127.0.0.1`. `tls.checkServerIdentity()` normalizes the host following the WHATWG URL rules, which read a leading-zero octet as octal (`0127.0.0.1` becomes `87.0.0.1`), while the connection is made through the operating system resolver, which on some platforms such as macOS reads it as decimal (`127.0.0.1`). A server at the connected address can then be authenticated with a certificate issued for another IP address. This vulnerability affects Node.js **26.x**, **24.x**, and **22.x**.3d