CVE WatchNov 10, 2026

CVE-2026-109799

The SAP Cloud SDK for Python contains an improper cryptographic signature verification vulnerability (CWE-347) in IASContextProvider, the ru

CVSS

7.5

High

EPSS

—

KEV

—

Exploit Today

—

0-100

Published: Nov 10, 2026 · Last modified: Nov 10, 2026 · CWE-347

EPSS · 30d

Not enough EPSS history yet.

Technical description

The SAP Cloud SDK for Python contains an improper cryptographic signature verification vulnerability (CWE-347) in IASContextProvider, the runtime-context provider registered by default via bootstrap(app).IASContextProvider extracted the app_tid, sap_gtid and user_uuid claims from the IAS JWT in the Authorization header using an unverified decoder and wrote them into the request-scoped RuntimeContext without validating the token signature. A remote caller could submit a self-signed JWT naming a victim tenant/user; the forged identity then propagated to every consumer of the runtime context:OTel span attributes (sap.tenancy.tenant_id, user.id) via RuntimeContextSpanProcessorlog records via IdentityLogFilteraudit events (tenant_id, user_initiator_id) via AuditClienttenant routing via CBCClientThis completes an earlier remediation that fixed the same unverified pattern in StarletteIASTelemetryMiddleware but did not cover IASContextProvider.

Official references

Related CVEs

CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTitleMod.

CVE-2026-47628.8 HIG

—

———A vulnerability to perform a privilege escalation attack on the server as a non-admin user.6h CVE-2026-12001710.0 CRI

—

———SAP NetWeaver AS ABAP and ABAP Platform does not perform sufficient verification of incoming authentication assertions under certain configurations. An unauthenticated attacker could submit specially crafted data to bypass authentication and impersonate arbitrary users, including privileged accounts. Successful exploitation could cause a full system compromise, with the impact potentially extending to connected components and systems beyond the affected system. This results in a high impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the application.11h CVE-2026-1237988.1 HIG

—

——0SuperTokens Core is an open source authentication server. From 11.3.0 until 11.3.7, 11.4.7, and 12.0.10, SAML.verifySamlResponseSignature calls OpenSAML SignatureValidator.validate without first applying SAMLSignatureProfileValidator. The Core can therefore accept a cryptographically valid signature that references a different XML element from the Response or Assertion whose NameID and attributes are used for authentication. An ordinary user of the configured identity provider can move a genuinely signed element elsewhere in the document while supplying an attacker-authored identity-bearing element, causing XML Signature Wrapping authentication as another IdP user. Both response-level and assertion-level signing paths are affected, and SP-initiated login remains reachable without enabling allowIDPInitiatedLogin. This issue is fixed in versions 11.3.7, 11.4.7, and 12.0.10.17h CVE-2026-1236058.8 HIG

14.7%

——4Hickory DNS hickory-proto 0.1 through 0.25.0-alpha.3 and hickory-net before 0.26.2 contain a DNSSEC validation bypass because the validator verifies an RRSIG against the DNSKEY of whatever name appears in its Signer's Name field without checking that this name is the zone containing the RRset. Attackers controlling any secure zone can produce valid signatures over arbitrary records in unrelated zones, which resolvers, recursors, and clients using DnssecDnsHandle accept as authenticated.2d CVE-2026-1235904.8 MED

5.0%

——2Hickory DNS hickory-net 0.26.0-beta.1 before 0.26.2 and hickory-proto through 0.26.0-alpha.1 accept NSEC and NSEC3 records for DNSSEC nonexistence proofs when any other record with the same owner name passes signature validation. Attackers able to supply DNS responses can mix validly signed records with bogus same-name NSEC or NSEC3 records of different types in the authority section to forge nonexistence proofs.22h CVE-2026-1235386.6 MED

2.8%

——1OpenAM before 16.1.4 does not verify that a signed SAML 1.x assertion or response was signed by the partner named as its issuer, accepting a signature from any certificate in OpenAM's keystore. An attacker holding such a private key, such as a trusted SAML 1.x partner, can forge assertions claiming another partner's issuer and sign in as that partner's users, including privileged ones.22h