CVE-2026-115183
The Qi Addons For Elementor WordPress plugin before 1.11.2 does not properly sanitise a widget's heading text after decoding HTML entities i
CVSS
2.4
Low
EPSS
0.1%
p1
KEV
—
Exploit Today
0
0-100
Published: Oct 25, 2026 · Last modified: Oct 26, 2026 · CWE-345
Not enough EPSS history yet.
The Qi Addons For Elementor WordPress plugin before 1.11.2 does not properly sanitise a widget's heading text after decoding HTML entities in it, allowing users with the Contributor role and above to embed live HTML forms, including password fields that submit to an external host, into posts where WordPress would otherwise strip them.
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTitleMod.
CVE-2026-1162546.5 MED—
——0A vulnerability was identified in rathena FluxCP up to 98cd4b8fd83228c11b36fb3d097b8e0f7c105a8d. This issue affects the function verifyiprange of the file lib/Flux/PaymentNotifyRequest.php of the component PayPal IPN Handler. The manipulation of the argument X-Real-IP leads to origin validation error. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.6hCVE-2026-1033005.3 MED—
——0The Eurobank WooCommerce Payment Gateway WordPress plugin through 2.1.1 does not verify that a payment-confirmation request genuinely originates from the payment provider, and ships with the secret that would authenticate it empty by default, allowing unauthenticated attackers to mark any pending order as paid, and to force any order into a failed status without any secret at all.6hCVE-2026-1161168.2 HIG—
——0A vulnerability was detected in Yoosee GM8135S Camera 21.00.01.36. Affected is an unknown function of the component Secure Boot. Performing a manipulation results in improper verification of cryptographic signature. The attack needs to be approached locally. The exploit is now public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.11hCVE-2026-1159339.9 CRI16.1%
——5Postiz signs its session, invitation and password reset tokens with one shared secret and without any marker of what a token is for. A route that refreshes the credentials of a browser-extension channel signed data taken from the request itself and stored the result where the requesting user can read it back. A user could therefore obtain a validly signed token containing any claims they choose, which the application accepts as a session, as an organization invitation with a chosen role, as a password reset or as an enterprise provisioning token.
A second, narrower route that creates team invitations signs extra fields from the request body in the same way.2dCVE-2026-1159377.5 HIG5.8%
——2The Mollie webhook endpoint accepts two independent, attacker-controlled parameters and never verifies that they belong together:
* commerceTransactionHash — selects which Craft Commerce transaction is completed
* id — selects which Mollie payment is queried for its status
An unauthenticated attacker holding any paid Mollie payment ID from the merchant’s account can pair it with any transaction hash.
Commerce queries Mollie, sees status: paid, and marks the target transaction successful for that transaction’s full
amount, regardless of how much was actually paid.3dCVE-2026-554597.4 HIG10.3%
——3The Goobi viewer is a web application that allows digitised material to be displayed in a web browser. From version 25.01 to before version 26.05, AuthenticationEndpoint.verifyOpenIdToken builds its verifier as JWT.require(algorithm).withIssuer(issuer).build() and does not enforce the aud claim during cryptographic validation. The aud check is performed manually afterwards via a single string-equality call, which only handles single-string aud values. In a multi-RP IdP setup, a token whose single-string aud matches the viewer's client ID but was issued for a different relying party passes the check and authenticates the attacker as the token's sub. This issue has been patched in version 26.05.3d