PULSE
FEED
ransomqilin reclama a ECOM · CH · Retail & E-Commerceransomemperador reclama a AyT COMPUTERS SRL · Technologyransomqilin reclama a ETO · DE · Not Foundransomn0n reclama a TOPLIVO AD · BG · Energy & Utilitiesransomn0n reclama a Technoleads Services Inc. · Technologyransomn0n reclama a Pure Grow Diamonds Inc. · Manufacturingransomn0n reclama a Mach Law APC (San Diego family law and divorce practice) · US · Professional Servicesransomn0n reclama a Keidel Supply Company Incorporated · US · Manufacturingransomn0n reclama a Andrews Advisory Group LLC · US · Professional Servicesransomemperador reclama a AB InBev · BE · Agriculture and Food Productionransomwhitearmor reclama a Hisense · CN · Technologyransomanubis reclama a Newcomer Cremations, Funerals & Receptions · US · Healthcareransomqilin reclama a Castle Howard Estate · GB · Hospitalityransomlamashtu reclama a Vins Viallet · FR · Retail & E-Commerceransomqilin reclama a ECOM · CH · Retail & E-Commerceransomemperador reclama a AyT COMPUTERS SRL · Technologyransomqilin reclama a ETO · DE · Not Foundransomn0n reclama a TOPLIVO AD · BG · Energy & Utilitiesransomn0n reclama a Technoleads Services Inc. · Technologyransomn0n reclama a Pure Grow Diamonds Inc. · Manufacturingransomn0n reclama a Mach Law APC (San Diego family law and divorce practice) · US · Professional Servicesransomn0n reclama a Keidel Supply Company Incorporated · US · Manufacturingransomn0n reclama a Andrews Advisory Group LLC · US · Professional Servicesransomemperador reclama a AB InBev · BE · Agriculture and Food Productionransomwhitearmor reclama a Hisense · CN · Technologyransomanubis reclama a Newcomer Cremations, Funerals & Receptions · US · Healthcareransomqilin reclama a Castle Howard Estate · GB · Hospitalityransomlamashtu reclama a Vins Viallet · FR · Retail & E-Commerce
← All CVEs
CVE WatchOct 23, 2026

CVE-2026-115893

Wasmtime is a runtime for WebAssembly. Prior to 36.0.19, 48.0.7, and 49.0.4, the Cranelift compiler backend on aarch64 can compile a Wasm br

CVSS

9.9

Critical

EPSS

0.4%

p37

KEV

—

Exploit Today

11

0-100

Published: Oct 23, 2026 · Last modified: Oct 23, 2026 · CWE-691

EPSS · 30d

Not enough EPSS history yet.

Technical description

Wasmtime is a runtime for WebAssembly. Prior to 36.0.19, 48.0.7, and 49.0.4, the Cranelift compiler backend on aarch64 can compile a Wasm br_table instruction with more than approximately 256,000 targets so that it has an incorrect conditional branch target. The branch can then jump to arbitrary other code at a user-controlled offset, allowing a user-controlled Wasm module to escape the sandbox on aarch64 engines using the default Cranelift backend. This issue is fixed in versions 36.0.19, 48.0.7, and 49.0.4.

Official references
Related CVEs
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTitleMod.
CVE-2026-764697.4 HIG
4.1%
——1As part of Cisco's ongoing commitment to proactive security and product quality, the Cisco networking engineering team has conducted a comprehensive internal security review. This review resulted in a software hardening releases that address multiple internally discovered vulnerabilities. The vulnerabilities tracked by CVE-2026-76469 are related to insufficient control flow management issues that are grouped under the Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) CWE-691.17d
CVE-2026-202768.6 HIG
40.2%
——12As part of Cisco's ongoing commitment to proactive security and product quality, the Cisco IOS XR Software engineering team has conducted a comprehensive internal security review. This review resulted in a software hardening releases that address multiple internally discovered vulnerabilities. The vulnerabilities tracked by CVE-2026-20276 are related to insufficient control flow management issues that are grouped under the Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) CWE-691.37d
CVE-2025-516757.5 HIG
39.6%
——12An issue was discovered in openRISC OR1200 commit 83ac6b. An inaccurate update of program counter (PC) values when SPR changes can lead to a Denial of Service (DoS).46d
CVE-2026-790338.8 HIG
35.3%
——11Insufficient control flow management in DevTools in Google Chrome prior to 152.0.7977.65 allowed a remote attacker leveraging social engineering to potentially execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)60d
CVE-2026-202718.6 HIG
40.2%
——12As part of Cisco's ongoing commitment to proactive security and product quality, the Cisco IOS XE Software engineering team has conducted a comprehensive internal security review. This review resulted in software hardening releases that address multiple internally discovered vulnerabilities. The vulnerabilities tracked by CVE-2026-20271 are related to insufficient control flow management issues that are grouped under the Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) Pillar CWE-691.  2d
CVE-2026-435038.8 HIG
80.5%
——24In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: skbuff: propagate shared-frag marker through frag-transfer helpers Two frag-transfer helpers (__pskb_copy_fclone() and skb_shift()) fail to propagate the SKBFL_SHARED_FRAG bit in skb_shinfo()->flags when moving frags from source to destination. __pskb_copy_fclone() defers the rest of the shinfo metadata to skb_copy_header() after copying frag descriptors, but that helper only carries over gso_{size,segs, type} and never touches skb_shinfo()->flags; skb_shift() moves frag descriptors directly and leaves flags untouched. As a result, the destination skb keeps a reference to the same externally-owned or page-cache-backed pages while reporting skb_has_shared_frag() as false. The mismatch is harmful in any in-place writer that uses skb_has_shared_frag() to decide whether shared pages must be detoured through skb_cow_data(). ESP input is one such writer (esp4.c, esp6.c), and a single nft 'dup to <local>' rule -- or any other nf_dup_ipv4() / xt_TEE caller -- is enough to land a pskb_copy()'d skb in esp_input() with the marker stripped, letting an unprivileged user write into the page cache of a root-owned read-only file via authencesn-ESN stray writes. Set SKBFL_SHARED_FRAG on the destination whenever frag descriptors were actually moved from the source. skb_copy() and skb_copy_expand() share skb_copy_header() too but linearize all paged data into freshly allocated head storage and emerge with nr_frags == 0, so skb_has_shared_frag() returns false on its own; they need no change. The same omission exists in skb_gro_receive() and skb_gro_receive_list(). The former moves the incoming skb's frag descriptors into the accumulator's last sub-skb via two paths (a direct frag-move loop and the head_frag + memcpy path); the latter chains the incoming skb whole onto p's frag_list. Downstream skb_segment() reads only skb_shinfo(p)->flags, and skb_segment_list() reuses each sub-skb's shinfo as the nskb -- both p and lp must carry the marker. The same omission also exists in tcp_clone_payload(), which builds an MTU probe skb by moving frag descriptors from skbs on sk_write_queue into a freshly allocated nskb. The helper falls into the same family and warrants the same fix for consistency; no TCP TX-side in-place writer is currently known to reach a user page through this gap, but a future consumer depending on the marker would regress silently. The same omission exists in skb_segment(): the per-iteration flag merge takes only head_skb's flag, and the inner switch that rebinds frag_skb to list_skb on head_skb-frags exhaustion does not fold the new frag_skb's flag into nskb. Fold frag_skb's flag at both sites so segments drawing frags from frag_list members carry the marker.9d