CVE WatchNov 1, 2026

CVE-2026-120223

A vulnerability was identified in Oray Pugongying X5 Pro up to 7.6.1. This impacts the function session_get of the file session.lua of the c

CVSS

3.1

Low

EPSS

0.3%

p25

KEV

—

Exploit Today

0-100

Published: Nov 1, 2026 · Last modified: Nov 1, 2026 · CWE-310 · CWE-330

EPSS · 30d

Not enough EPSS history yet.

Technical description

A vulnerability was identified in Oray Pugongying X5 Pro up to 7.6.1. This impacts the function session_get of the file session.lua of the component Session ID Handler. The manipulation of the argument _user leads to insufficiently random values. The attack can be initiated remotely. The attack's complexity is rated as high. The exploitability is said to be difficult. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Official references

Related CVEs

CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTitleMod.

CVE-2026-1161143.7 LOW

8.4%

——3A weakness has been identified in Yoosee GM8135S Camera 21.00.01.36. This affects an unknown function of the file /npc/npc of the component Live UDP H.264 Video Stream Handler. This manipulation causes cleartext transmission of sensitive information. The attack can be initiated remotely. The attack's complexity is rated as high. The exploitability is reported as difficult. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.7d CVE-2026-1161053.7 LOW

19.2%

——6A weakness has been identified in HeyCyan App 1.0.103 on Android. Affected is an unknown function of the file AndroidManifest.xml of the component Network Security Configuration. Executing a manipulation can lead to cleartext transmission of sensitive information. The attack can be launched remotely. The attack requires a high level of complexity. The exploitability is told to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.7d CVE-2026-799816.5 MED

2.1%

——1The DNS stub resolver in subsys/net/lib/dns/resolve.c binds one UDP socket per configured server when the resolver context is initialised (dns_resolve_init_locked() -> register_dispatcher() -> dns_dispatcher_register()), with the local port left at 0 so the stack picks an ephemeral port exactly once. dns_write() then sends every subsequent query from that same socket without re-binding, so the source port is constant for the lifetime of the resolver context while only the 16-bit transaction identifier (ctx->queries[i].id, drawn with sys_rand16_get()) varies per query. RFC 5452 section 9.2 requires both to vary; with a fixed port, an off-path attacker has to guess only the identifier. The stable port is cheap to learn. Any single observed query reveals it permanently, and it can also be found by probing the ephemeral UDP range: subsys/net/ip/connection.c answers unmatched unicast UDP with an ICMP port-unreachable, so the resolver's socket is the one port in that range that stays silent. Acceptance of a reply is decided solely by get_slot_by_id() matching the transaction identifier and a CRC-16 of the queried name — the reply's source address is never checked (dispatcher_cb() does ARG_UNUSED(addr)), so forged answers need not even be spoofed to appear to come from the configured server; they only need to reach the resolver's port. An attacker with UDP reachability to the device (same LAN, Wi-Fi or mesh segment, or a globally routable device address) can therefore flood answers for a predictable query name across the 16-bit identifier space during a query window and race the legitimate server. A win makes the application resolve an attacker-chosen address, and with CONFIG_DNS_RESOLVER_CACHE enabled the forged record is retained for its attacker-chosen TTL. The attack still requires winning that race, and applications that validate TLS certificates for the resolved endpoint are largely protected. The fix draws a fresh local port before each query to a server that has nothing outstanding: dns_randomize_source_port() unregisters the dispatcher, closes and reopens the socket, and re-registers it bound to port 0 so the system selects a new port, raising the per-query guessing space from roughly 16 to roughly 31 bits. Multicast DNS and LLMNR are excluded because their ports are protocol-fixed. The behaviour is controlled by CONFIG_DNS_RESOLVER_RANDOMIZE_SOURCE_PORT (default y).7d CVE-2026-1157973.7 LOW

10.2%

——3A weakness has been identified in Tenda F6 12.02.01.73. Affected is an unknown function of the component Web Management Interface. Executing a manipulation of the argument ecos_pw can lead to cleartext transmission of sensitive information. The attack may be launched remotely. This attack is characterized by high complexity. The exploitability is told to be difficult. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks.4d CVE-2026-1060744.8 MED

26.8%

——8A flaw in Node.js `crypto` causes the internal entropy caches used by `crypto.randomUUID()`, `crypto.randomUUIDv7()`, and `crypto.randomInt()` to be saved into user-land startup snapshots (`--build-snapshot`) and single executable applications built with `useSnapshot`. If any of these functions, or an API that relies on them such as `URL.createObjectURL()`, is called while the snapshot is built, every process started from that snapshot returns the same values until the cache is refilled: up to 127 UUIDs and about 1,000 `randomInt()` values. Identifiers expected to be unique can collide across processes, and values issued by one process can be predicted by observing another. This vulnerability affects Node.js **26.x**, **24.x**, and **22.x**.10d CVE-2026-463476.8 MED

16.9%

——5The Goobi viewer is a web application that allows digitised material to be displayed in a web browser. Prior to version 26.05, when a password reset link is visited, the application generates a replacement password in a predictable way and emails it to the account holder. The insufficient entropy allows the password to be brute-forced by an attacker who can approximate the server-side generation time. Exploiting this finding in isolation requires the victim to have triggered the reset themselves and the attacker to infer the server time from network or email metadata. This issue has been patched in version 26.05.4d