PULSE
FEED
ransombravox reclama a AWO Bundesverband · DE · Otherransomdark project reclama a MTM&O Gold Refinery DMCC · AE · Manufacturingransomdark project reclama a Bear Valley Community Hospital · US · Healthcareransomplay reclama a NY Snacks · US · Retail & E-Commerceransomplay reclama a BROTHERS EXPRESS LLC · US · Transportationransomplay reclama a Signworx · GB · Otherransomsilentransomgroup reclama a A&O Shearman · GB · Professional Servicesransomsilentransomgroup reclama a J...ransomhyflock reclama a tcadarwin · AU · Otherransombyod reclama a Providence · Healthcareransombyod reclama a Toyota · JP · Manufacturingransomorova reclama a Herminio India Precision Technology · IN · Manufacturingransomkrybit reclama a Actualize Consulting · US · Professional Servicesransomclimax inc reclama a Redacted Redactedransombravox reclama a AWO Bundesverband · DE · Otherransomdark project reclama a MTM&O Gold Refinery DMCC · AE · Manufacturingransomdark project reclama a Bear Valley Community Hospital · US · Healthcareransomplay reclama a NY Snacks · US · Retail & E-Commerceransomplay reclama a BROTHERS EXPRESS LLC · US · Transportationransomplay reclama a Signworx · GB · Otherransomsilentransomgroup reclama a A&O Shearman · GB · Professional Servicesransomsilentransomgroup reclama a J...ransomhyflock reclama a tcadarwin · AU · Otherransombyod reclama a Providence · Healthcareransombyod reclama a Toyota · JP · Manufacturingransomorova reclama a Herminio India Precision Technology · IN · Manufacturingransomkrybit reclama a Actualize Consulting · US · Professional Servicesransomclimax inc reclama a Redacted Redacted
← All CVEs
CVE WatchNov 8, 2026

CVE-2026-123584

The hickory-net crate in Hickory DNS 0.26.0 before 0.26.2 stops listening and returns an error when a client UDP connection receives a datag

CVSS

5.9

Medium

EPSS

0.4%

p31

KEV

—

Exploit Today

9

0-100

Published: Nov 8, 2026 · Last modified: Nov 8, 2026 · CWE-696

EPSS · 30d
0.4%EPSS · 30 days0.4%
2026-11-082026-11-10
Technical description

The hickory-net crate in Hickory DNS 0.26.0 before 0.26.2 stops listening and returns an error when a client UDP connection receives a datagram that cannot be parsed as a DNS message. Remote attackers who guess the query's source port, without knowing the transaction ID, can spoof malformed responses to abort client queries, causing denial of service.

Official references
Related CVEs
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTitleMod.
CVE-2026-1212918.2 HIG
—
——0A crafted Error Report can leave EOS stuck believing that a cache reset is in progress, preventing ROA publication, withdrawal reconciliation, and BGP origin-validation updates.5h
CVE-2026-63027—
—
——0Incorrect behavior order in the get_tcb_level_by_svn for the Intel(R) TDX Migration Trust Domain (MigTD) within Ring 0: Hypervisor may allow a denial of service. Network adversary with an unauthenticated user combined with a low complexity attack may enable denial of service. This result may potentially occur via adjacent access when attack requirements are not present without special internal knowledge and requires no user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (low) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (none) impacts.7h
CVE-2026-112186—
—
——0In Eclipse Kura versions 5.4.0 through 5.6.2, the Service Listing V1 REST API read the JSON body of every request into memory, with no limit on its size. The endpoints parse the body before they check whether the caller is authenticated. A remote attacker without valid credentials can therefore send a few dozen large JSON requests at the same time, exhaust the Java heap with an `OutOfMemoryError`, and cause a denial of service. Likewise, a remote attacker, can send a deeply nested JSON request and trigger a `StackOverflowError` because of an unbound recursion in Service Listing V1.8h
CVE-2026-1236122.3 LOW
1.3%
——0rustls 0.23.44 and 0.23.45 contain an information disclosure vulnerability that sends application data buffered before the handshake completes to the client-facing server when Encrypted Client Hello is rejected. Because start_traffic() queues plaintext from ClientConnection::writer() before sending the ech_required alert, the authenticated public_name server receives data intended for the inner server.3d
CVE-2026-82898—
25.6%
——8Incorrect order of security checks in Apache Wicket. org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.ResourceIsolationRequestCycleListener obtains the page a request targets before it consults its resource isolation policies, because those policies are passed that page. Obtaining the page instantiates it, and instantiating a page runs the configured org.apache.wicket.authorization.IAuthorizationStrategy. An application that refuses an unauthenticated visitor by throwing org.apache.wicket.RestartResponseAtInterceptPageException therefore throws it from inside the isolation listener, before any policy has run. That exception replaces the request handler, so the policies are never consulted and a request that came from another origin is not refused. The exception's constructor stores the URL of the request it interrupted, so that Component#continueToOriginalDestination() can resume it once the visitor has signed in. The stored URL is the one the policies would have refused. On sign in Wicket redirects to it, and that redirect is same-origin, so the policies allow it and the listener runs in the newly authenticated session. The whole URL is stored, its query string included, so an ordinary org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.Form is resumed with the field values the original request carried in its query string and Form#onSubmit() runs with values another origin chose. A form POST is not needed for this; a plain top-level navigation carries them. An application is affected where it registers ResourceIsolationRequestCycleListener, which is opt-in and is not registered by default, and where it refuses unauthorized access with RestartResponseAtInterceptPageException followed by continueToOriginalDestination(). No application override is involved on that path: IAuthorizationStrategy#isInstantiationAuthorized() documents throwing that exception, org.apache.wicket.authroles.authentication.AuthenticatedWebApplication throws it and org.apache.wicket.authroles.authentication.panel.UsernamePasswordPanel continues to the original destination, and org.apache.wicket.authorization.strategies.page.SimplePageAuthorizationStrategy in wicket-core installs the same pattern. A visitor who is already signed in is not affected, because no interception occurs. Request-body parameters stored alongside the intercepted URL are not applied to the resumed form: the resumption is a redirect, so the resumed request is a GET, and form components read their values from the query string on a GET. As a workaround, refuse unauthorized access with org.apache.wicket.RestartResponseException instead, which does not store the original destination; visitors are then not returned to the page they asked for after signing in. This issue affects Apache Wicket: from 9.1.0 through 9.24.0, from 10.0.0 through 10.11.0. Releases before 9.1.0, which is every 8.x release and 9.0.0, are not affected, because the resource isolation this issue concerns was introduced in 9.1.0. They are not protected either. Their only cross-origin defence is org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.CsrfPreventionRequestCycleListener, which works out where a request came from by reading its Origin header and falling back to its Referer header. Neither header need arrive: a browser does not send Origin on the plain GET a link uses, and the document on the other origin decides through its own referrer policy whether a Referer reaches the application at all. That mechanism therefore never made the guarantee the Fetch Metadata based policy makes, and on those releases a listener invocation from another origin is not reliably refused in the first place. Anyone on a release before 9.1.0 who wants this protection should upgrade to 9.x or 10.x and register ResourceIsolationRequestCycleListener. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 9.25.0 or 10.12.0, which fix the issue.4d
CVE-2026-652197.4 HIG
39.7%
——12A flaw in the BMC RAKP+ implementation may allow an attacker to send a request followed by a specially crafted RAKP message and establish an RMCP+ session, which could then be used to execute commands.6d