PULSE
LIVE10signals / 24h
FEED
ransomthegentlemen reclama a Ecopetrol · CO · Energyransomqilin reclama a City Ambulance Service · Healthcareransomqilin reclama a Famesa · PE · Agriculture and Food Productionransomkrybit reclama a euroins.bg · BG · Financial Servicesransomnova reclama a FMZ Tecnologia em Sistemas · BR · Technologyransomqilin reclama a Heartland Catfish · US · Agriculture and Food Productionransomqilin reclama a Salina Supply · US · Business Servicesransomqilin reclama a St Martha Catholic Church · US · Consumer Servicesransomqilin reclama a The Nueva School · US · Educationransomdragonforce reclama a NewNet · SA · Telecommunicationransomqilin reclama a Sicc · IT · Not Foundransomqilin reclama a KLD Labs · US · Technologyransomqilin reclama a Armara · FR · Not Foundransomqilin reclama a AK Preparedness · Business Servicesransomthegentlemen reclama a Ecopetrol · CO · Energyransomqilin reclama a City Ambulance Service · Healthcareransomqilin reclama a Famesa · PE · Agriculture and Food Productionransomkrybit reclama a euroins.bg · BG · Financial Servicesransomnova reclama a FMZ Tecnologia em Sistemas · BR · Technologyransomqilin reclama a Heartland Catfish · US · Agriculture and Food Productionransomqilin reclama a Salina Supply · US · Business Servicesransomqilin reclama a St Martha Catholic Church · US · Consumer Servicesransomqilin reclama a The Nueva School · US · Educationransomdragonforce reclama a NewNet · SA · Telecommunicationransomqilin reclama a Sicc · IT · Not Foundransomqilin reclama a KLD Labs · US · Technologyransomqilin reclama a Armara · FR · Not Foundransomqilin reclama a AK Preparedness · Business Services
← All CVEs
CVE WatchJul 2, 2026

CVE-2026-14101

Insufficient policy enforcement in Sandbox in Google Chrome on Mac prior to 150.0.7871.47 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the

CVSS

9.6

Critical

EPSS

0.2%

p15

KEV

Exploit Today

5

0-100

Published: Jun 30, 2026 · Last modified: Jul 2, 2026 · CWE-269 · CWE-693

EPSS · 30d
0.2%EPSS · 30 days0.2%
2026-07-012026-07-18
Technical description

Insufficient policy enforcement in Sandbox in Google Chrome on Mac prior to 150.0.7871.47 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low)

Official references
Related CVEs
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTitleMod.
CVE-2026-468179.8 CRI
60.3%
KEV68Oracle E-Business Suite Improper Privilege Management Vulnerability3d
CVE-2022-250899.8 CRI
96.9%
29Printix Secure Cloud Print Management through 1.3.1106.0 incorrectly uses Privileged APIs to modify values in HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE via UITasks.PersistentRegistryData.10d
CVE-2026-503437.8 HIG
83.2%
25Improper privilege management in Microsoft Install Service allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.4d
CVE-2022-262517.2 HIG
75.4%
23The HTTP interface of Synaman v5.1 and below was discovered to allow authenticated attackers to execute arbitrary code and escalate privileges.10d
CVE-2026-506467.8 HIG
72.8%
22Protection mechanism failure in .NET Framework allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally.4d
CVE-2026-463337.1 HIG
69.0%
21In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ptrace: slightly saner 'get_dumpable()' logic The 'dumpability' of a task is fundamentally about the memory image of the task - the concept comes from whether it can core dump or not - and makes no sense when you don't have an associated mm. And almost all users do in fact use it only for the case where the task has a mm pointer. But we have one odd special case: ptrace_may_access() uses 'dumpable' to check various other things entirely independently of the MM (typically explicitly using flags like PTRACE_MODE_READ_FSCREDS). Including for threads that no longer have a VM (and maybe never did, like most kernel threads). It's not what this flag was designed for, but it is what it is. The ptrace code does check that the uid/gid matches, so you do have to be uid-0 to see kernel thread details, but this means that the traditional "drop capabilities" model doesn't make any difference for this all. Make it all make a *bit* more sense by saying that if you don't have a MM pointer, we'll use a cached "last dumpability" flag if the thread ever had a MM (it will be zero for kernel threads since it is never set), and require a proper CAP_SYS_PTRACE capability to override.4d