PULSE
FEED
ransompear reclama a Macfarlan Capital Partners · US · Financial Servicesransompear reclama a Solar Communications International · US · Technologyransompear reclama a Caretaker Landscape and Tree Management · US · Agriculture and Food Productionransombravox reclama a Minkon · DE · Not Foundransomaurora reclama a Adams Warehouse & Delivery, Inc. · US · Transportationransomthegentlemen reclama a Suhai Segurana Pessoal · BR · Professional Servicesransomthegentlemen reclama a SBI Audiovisual Medinbox · ES · Healthcareransomthegentlemen reclama a Saga University · JP · Educationransomthegentlemen reclama a Netcore Unbxd · IN · Technologyransomthegentlemen reclama a REGiO Nord · DE · Otherransomthegentlemen reclama a Museum Siam · TH · Hospitalityransomthegentlemen reclama a Skin Center · US · Healthcareransomthegentlemen reclama a Thai Ha PCL KASET · TH · Agriculture and Food Productionransomthegentlemen reclama a Inovar Packaging Group · AU · Manufacturingransompear reclama a Macfarlan Capital Partners · US · Financial Servicesransompear reclama a Solar Communications International · US · Technologyransompear reclama a Caretaker Landscape and Tree Management · US · Agriculture and Food Productionransombravox reclama a Minkon · DE · Not Foundransomaurora reclama a Adams Warehouse & Delivery, Inc. · US · Transportationransomthegentlemen reclama a Suhai Segurana Pessoal · BR · Professional Servicesransomthegentlemen reclama a SBI Audiovisual Medinbox · ES · Healthcareransomthegentlemen reclama a Saga University · JP · Educationransomthegentlemen reclama a Netcore Unbxd · IN · Technologyransomthegentlemen reclama a REGiO Nord · DE · Otherransomthegentlemen reclama a Museum Siam · TH · Hospitalityransomthegentlemen reclama a Skin Center · US · Healthcareransomthegentlemen reclama a Thai Ha PCL KASET · TH · Agriculture and Food Productionransomthegentlemen reclama a Inovar Packaging Group · AU · Manufacturing
← All CVEs
CVE WatchOct 13, 2026

CVE-2026-19740

The Link Layer Control Procedure (LLCP) implementation of the Zephyr software Bluetooth LE Controller retains the receive node that carried

CVSS

6.5

Medium

EPSS

0.1%

p1

KEV

—

Exploit Today

0

0-100

Published: Oct 11, 2026 · Last modified: Oct 13, 2026 · CWE-401 · CWE-459 · CWE-617

EPSS · 30d
0.1%EPSS · 30 days0.1%
2026-10-122026-10-15
Technical description

The Link Layer Control Procedure (LLCP) implementation of the Zephyr software Bluetooth LE Controller retains the receive node that carried an accepted LL_PHY_UPDATE_IND so that it can later be reused for the host notification when the update instant is reached (llcp_rx_node_retain() in subsys/bluetooth/controller/ll_sw/ull_llcp.c, and the node is deliberately not recycled while marked NODE_RX_TYPE_RETAIN). The invalid-PDU arms of llcp_lp_pu_rx() and llcp_rp_pu_rx() in subsys/bluetooth/controller/ll_sw/ull_llcp_phy.c completed the procedure via llcp_lr_complete() / llcp_rr_complete() without first releasing that retained node, so the procedure context — the only remaining reference to the node — was freed while the node was still held out of the receive pool. A peer device on an established LE connection can drive this deterministically and without pairing or encryption. Against a peripheral it sends LL_PHY_REQ, receives LL_PHY_RSP, sends a valid LL_PHY_UPDATE_IND with an instant a few connection events in the future (so the node becomes retained), and then, before the instant is reached, sends any other LL Control PDU such as LL_LENGTH_REQ; ull_cp_rx() routes it to the active remote PHY Update procedure, which takes the invalid-PDU path. The mirror case applies to a locally initiated PHY Update followed by an LL_REJECT_IND. In the default configuration (CONFIG_BT_ASSERT and CONFIG_BT_CTLR_ASSERT_DEBUG both default y) the violated invariant in llcp_lr_check_done() / llcp_rr_check_done() triggers a controller assertion, ending in k_oops() (or k_panic()) — a single crafted PDU sequence from radio range faults the device. With those assertions compiled out, each attempt silently leaks one receive PDU node and its memq link; because the controller receive pool is small (PDU_RX_CNT, driven by CONFIG_BT_CTLR_RX_BUFFERS, which defaults to 1) and each attempt costs the attacker only a reconnect, a few repetitions exhaust the pool and leave Bluetooth inoperable until reboot. On releases v3.4.0 through v3.7.x the assertion is never reached, whatever the configuration, so every attempt leaks silently. The impact is limited to availability: the orphaned node leaves no dangling pointer that is later dereferenced and is never delivered to the host, so there is no memory corruption or information disclosure. The same pull request applies the identical release to the Connection Update and CIS-create procedures, whose invalid-PDU arms had the same omission.

Official references
Related CVEs
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTitleMod.
CVE-2026-870187.5 HIG
—
——0undici is an HTTP client library for Node.js. In versions 4.2.1 through 6.29.0, 7.0.0 through 7.30.0, and 8.0.0 through 8.12.1, the client process crashes when a TLS 1.2 server renegotiates after the connection is established and presents a different, CA-trusted certificate whose hostname does not match the requested host. Node.js re-runs hostname verification on the renegotiated handshake and destroys the socket with a certificate-altname error, but undici's established-socket error handler asserted that this error code could never occur, so the peer-controlled error became an uncaught assertion that terminates the Node.js process, affecting both the HTTP/1.1 and HTTP/2 paths. A malicious or compromised HTTPS endpoint reached through undici or the global fetch() can crash the client with a single server-initiated renegotiation, taking down all in-flight requests and background work in the process, and exploitation needs no CA compromise because the attacker controls the endpoint and can present two ordinary valid certificates. Only TLS 1.2 is affected, since TLS 1.3 does not support renegotiation. The issue is fixed in undici 6.29.1, 7.30.1, and 8.12.2, and users should upgrade to one of those versions or later. As a workaround, restrict outbound connections to TLS 1.3 so renegotiation cannot occur, when the target endpoints support it.20h
CVE-2026-1098697.5 HIG
—
——0undici is an HTTP client library for Node.js. In versions 6.23.0 through 6.29.0, 7.18.0 through 7.30.0, and 8.0.0 through 8.12.1, its fetch() implementation crashes the Node.js process when a malicious server returns a response with more than five content codings and closes the connection before sending the body. undici rejects such responses because of a content-encoding limit, but it created the internal response stream before that check and returned without attaching an error listener or aborting the request, so the early close surfaces a content-length mismatch on the orphaned stream, which Node.js treats as an unhandled error and terminates the process. A remote, unauthenticated server can trigger this with a single response, even when the application correctly catches the fetch() rejection, resulting in a denial of service. The issue is fixed in undici 6.29.1, 7.30.1, and 8.12.2, and users should upgrade to one of those versions or later. There is no workaround.20h
CVE-2026-1109244.8 MED
—
——0A flaw was found in OpenSSH. With GSSAPI authentication enabled, a failed GSSAPI attempt can leave delegated credentials stored for the connection even though user authorization did not succeed. A later successful login on that connection is not authorized by the leftover state.23h
CVE-2026-175255.2 MED
—
——0Incomplete cleanup vulnerability in ABB My Control System. This issue affects My Control System: 26.4 and 26.5.1d
CVE-2026-921606.5 MED
25.7%
——8F´ (F Prime) is a framework that enables development and deployment of spaceflight and other embedded software applications. Prior to 4.3.0, Svc::FileDownlink SendPartial range validation is vulnerable because the wrapping sum bypasses file-range validation, becomes m_endOffset, and leaves m_byteOffset greater than the wrapped end offset. When an existing source file is larger than the supplied startOffset and a caller able to issue SendPartial supplies a length whose U32 sum with that offset wraps, the first data-packet send reaches FW_ASSERT and aborts or resets the process, causing denial of service. This issue is fixed in version 4.3.0.1d
CVE-2026-921576.5 MED
34.8%
——10F´ (F Prime) is a framework that enables development and deployment of spaceflight and other embedded software applications. Prior to 4.3.0, Svc::FileDownlink SendPartial range validation is vulnerable because unchecked startOffset plus length arithmetic bypasses the range check and stores a wrapped m_endOffset that is inconsistent with m_byteOffset. When an existing source file is larger than a valid startOffset and a SendPartial command supplies a length whose U32 sum with that offset wraps below the file size, under standard F Prime assertion handling, the first data-packet transition reaches FW_ASSERT and aborts or resets the process, causing denial of service. This issue is fixed in version 4.3.0.1d