PULSE
FEED
vulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-58704 — Google / PixelvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-76460 — Cisco / Identity Services EnginevulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-87886 — Acronis / BackupvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-76461 — Cisco / Secure Email GatewayvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-84869 — ConnectWise / ScreenConnectvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-42016 — JFrog / ArtifactoryvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-42018 — JFrog / ArtifactoryvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-85706 — GitLab / Community Edition and Enterprise EditionvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-86060 — MikroTik / RouterOSvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-67277 — MikroTik / RouterOSvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-19490 — Citrix / NetScalervulnKEV agrega CVE-2025-25249 — Fortinet / Multiple ProductsvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-87491 — Google / Chromium V8vulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-20079 — Cisco / Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) and Security Cloud Control (SCC) Firewall ManagementvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-58704 — Google / PixelvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-76460 — Cisco / Identity Services EnginevulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-87886 — Acronis / BackupvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-76461 — Cisco / Secure Email GatewayvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-84869 — ConnectWise / ScreenConnectvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-42016 — JFrog / ArtifactoryvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-42018 — JFrog / ArtifactoryvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-85706 — GitLab / Community Edition and Enterprise EditionvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-86060 — MikroTik / RouterOSvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-67277 — MikroTik / RouterOSvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-19490 — Citrix / NetScalervulnKEV agrega CVE-2025-25249 — Fortinet / Multiple ProductsvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-87491 — Google / Chromium V8vulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-20079 — Cisco / Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) and Security Cloud Control (SCC) Firewall Management
← All CVEs
CVE WatchAug 19, 2026

CVE-2026-20065

Multiple Cisco products are affected by a vulnerability in the Snort 3 Detection Engine that could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker

CVSS

5.8

Medium

EPSS

0.4%

p30

KEV

Exploit Today

9

0-100

Published: Mar 4, 2026 · Last modified: Aug 19, 2026 · CWE-667

EPSS · 30d
0.4%EPSS · 30 days0.4%
2026-08-202026-09-17
Technical description

Multiple Cisco products are affected by a vulnerability in the Snort 3 Detection Engine that could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause the Snort 3 Detection Engine to restart, resulting in an interruption of packet inspection. This vulnerability is due to an error in the binder module initialization logic of the Snort Detection Engine. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending certain packets through an established connection that is parsed by Snort 3. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause a DoS condition when the Snort 3 Detection Engine restarts unexpectedly.

Official references
Related CVEs
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTitleMod.
CVE-2026-569148.4 HIG
0.0%
0In multiple locations, there is a possible use-after-free due to improper locking. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.2d
CVE-2026-801266.5 MED
9.1%
3Dell SCG 5.0 Appliance versions prior to 5.36.00.16 and Dell SCG 5.0 Application versions prior to 5.36.00.00, contains an Improper Locking vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to filesystem access for attacker.3d
CVE-2026-45404
3.1%
1OpenTelemetry-Go is the Go implementation of OpenTelemetry. From version 0.11.0 through 1.44.0, the OpenTracing bridge's bridgeSpan contains an unsynchronized extraBaggageItems map which can cause a panic. Because Go maps are not safe for concurrent read/write access, concurrent SetBaggageItem and correlation.MapFromContext calls on the same hooked bridgeSpan can trigger a fatal runtime error—such as concurrent map read and map write or concurrent map iteration and map write—terminating the process and causing denial of service. This issue is fixed in version 1.45.0.9d
CVE-2026-624268.8 HIG
12.6%
4[This CNA information record relates to multiple CVEs; the text explains which aspects/vulnerabilities correspond to which CVE.] To manage the system, sysctl and platform operations are used by the control domain or a possible Xenstore domain. Some of these operations may not be executed in parallel, so a system-wide lock each is used. The way those locks are acquired is, however, not providing any fairness. Furthermore, with XSM/Flask in use, the lock acquire will, for some operations, occur ahead of any permission checking. The sysctl issue is CVE-2026-62426. The platform-op issue is CVE-2026-62427.52d
CVE-2026-644295.5 MED
0.7%
0In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: gpio: eic-sprd: use raw_spinlock_t in the irq startup path sprd_eic_irq_unmask() enables the GPIO IRQ and then updates controller state through sprd_eic_update(), which takes sprd_eic->lock with spin_lock_irqsave(). The callback can be reached from irq_startup() while setting up a requested IRQ. That path is not sleepable, but on PREEMPT_RT a regular spinlock_t becomes a sleeping lock. This issue was found by our static analysis tool and then manually reviewed against the current tree. The grounded PoC kept the request_threaded_irq() -> __setup_irq() -> irq_startup() -> sprd_eic_irq_unmask() -> sprd_eic_update() carrier and used the original spin_lock_irqsave(&sprd_eic->lock) edge. Lockdep BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context hardirqs last disabled at ... __setup_irq.constprop.0 ... [vuln_msv] sprd_rt_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x30 [vuln_msv] sprd_eic_update.constprop.0+0x48/0x90 [vuln_msv] sprd_eic_irq_unmask.constprop.0+0x35/0x50 [vuln_msv] __setup_irq.constprop.0+0xd/0x30 [vuln_msv] Convert the Spreadtrum EIC controller lock to raw_spinlock_t. The locked section only serializes MMIO register updates and does not contain sleepable operations, so keeping it non-sleeping is appropriate for the irqchip callbacks.15d
CVE-2026-644155.5 MED
0.7%
0In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm/swap: add cond_resched() in swap_reclaim_full_clusters to prevent softlockup We hit a real softlockup in an internal stress test environment. The workload was LTP memory/swap stress on a large arm64 machine, with 320 CPUs, about 1TB memory and an 8.6GB swap device. The system was under heavy load and the swap device had a large number of full clusters. The softlockup was triggered during a stress test after about 3 days. So, add periodic cond_resched() calls during large full_clusters reclaim operations to prevent softlockup issues. Detailed call trace as follow: PID: 3817773 TASK: ffff0883bb28b780 CPU: 48 COMMAND: "kworker/48:7" #0 [ffff800080183d10] __crash_kexec at ffffa4c1361e5de4 #1 [ffff800080183d90] panic at ffffa4c1360d5e9c #2 [ffff800080183e20] watchdog_timer_fn at ffffa4c136231fa8 ... #16 [ffff8000c4ad3cb0] swap_cache_del_folio at ffffa4c1363e1614 #17 [ffff8000c4ad3ce0] __try_to_reclaim_swap at ffffa4c1363e4bfc #18 [ffff8000c4ad3d40] swap_reclaim_full_clusters at ffffa4c1363e5474 #19 [ffff8000c4ad3da0] swap_reclaim_work at ffffa4c1363e550c #20 [ffff8000c4ad3dc0] process_one_work at ffffa4c136102edc #21 [ffff8000c4ad3e10] worker_thread at ffffa4c136103398 #22 [ffff8000c4ad3e70] kthread at ffffa4c13610d95c14d