PULSE
FEED
ransomincransom reclama a chicagolawyer.com · US · Professional Servicesransomeverstake reclama a sp*****g.comransomsilentransomgroup reclama a ArentFox Schiff · US · Professional Servicesransomemperador reclama a Studio Stelitano e Associati · IT · Professional Servicesransomgenesis reclama a Acclaim Companies / JCJ Investment · US · Financial Servicesransomgenesis reclama a Gilliam & Associates, P.C · US · Professional Servicesransomgenesis reclama a Facts N Figures · US · Professional Servicesransomgenesis reclama a Illinois Work Injury Resource Center (IWIRC) · US · Healthcareransomgenesis reclama a Psychometrics Canada · CA · Professional Servicesransomgenesis reclama a Louisiana Crane & Construction · US · Manufacturingransomgenesis reclama a Aliqout Association · USransomgenesis reclama a EAS Engineering · US · Manufacturingransomgenesis reclama a Fred H Beck & Associates · US · Professional Servicesransomwhitearmor reclama a KTU Shipyard · PH · Transportationransomincransom reclama a chicagolawyer.com · US · Professional Servicesransomeverstake reclama a sp*****g.comransomsilentransomgroup reclama a ArentFox Schiff · US · Professional Servicesransomemperador reclama a Studio Stelitano e Associati · IT · Professional Servicesransomgenesis reclama a Acclaim Companies / JCJ Investment · US · Financial Servicesransomgenesis reclama a Gilliam & Associates, P.C · US · Professional Servicesransomgenesis reclama a Facts N Figures · US · Professional Servicesransomgenesis reclama a Illinois Work Injury Resource Center (IWIRC) · US · Healthcareransomgenesis reclama a Psychometrics Canada · CA · Professional Servicesransomgenesis reclama a Louisiana Crane & Construction · US · Manufacturingransomgenesis reclama a Aliqout Association · USransomgenesis reclama a EAS Engineering · US · Manufacturingransomgenesis reclama a Fred H Beck & Associates · US · Professional Servicesransomwhitearmor reclama a KTU Shipyard · PH · Transportation
← All CVEs
CVE WatchOct 26, 2026

CVE-2026-3623

IBM Netezza Performance Server Replication Services 3.0.2.0 through 3.0.5.0 allows an attacker with low‑privileged access to escalate their

CVSS

7.8

High

EPSS

0.2%

p4

KEV

—

Exploit Today

1

0-100

Published: May 27, 2026 · Last modified: Oct 26, 2026 · CWE-250

EPSS · 30d
0.2%EPSS · 30 days0.2%
2026-10-022026-10-29
Technical description

IBM Netezza Performance Server Replication Services 3.0.2.0 through 3.0.5.0 allows an attacker with low‑privileged access to escalate their privileges to root. By exploiting this flaw, the attacker can execute root‑level commands, obtain a root shell, and change the root user’s password. Successful exploitation also enables modification or removal of system‑wide files and the installation of persistent backdoors. This results in full system compromise with complete loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

Official references
Related CVEs
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTitleMod.
CVE-2026-405738.6 HIG
—
———NovumOS is a custom 32-bit operating system written in Zig and x86 Assembly. Prior to version 0.25-beta.1, the `Nova` interpreter runs in Ring 0 with unrestricted kernel-memory access. Loading a malicious `.nv` script through the shell permits a local user to execute code with kernel privileges without security checks. The advisory identifies VM initialization in `zig/nova/vm.zig` as the affected component; script execution is not isolated in a restricted Ring 3 privilege domain. This issue is fixed in version 0.25-beta.1.9h
CVE-2025-30046—
18.2%
——5In the CGM CLININET application server, multiple processes responsible for HL7 communication with external systems run with root privileges while processing untrusted data received from those external systems. An attacker in adjacent network able to send data to these HL7 communication processes can achieve remote code execution with root privileges.  The vulnerability was confirmed to affect versions up to 2026.MS3 but later versions may also be vulnerable.2d
CVE-2026-913352.6 LOW
11.2%
——3Vulnerability in the Oracle Java SE, Oracle GraalVM for JDK, Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition product of Oracle Java SE (component: AWT). Supported versions that are affected are Oracle Java SE: 8u503, 8u503-perf, 11.0.32.1, 17.0.20.1, 21.0.12.1, 25.0.4.1, 27; Oracle GraalVM for JDK: 17.0.20.1 and 21.0.12.1; Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition: 21.3.19.1.1. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via multiple protocols to compromise Oracle Java SE, Oracle GraalVM for JDK, Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized read access to a subset of Oracle Java SE, Oracle GraalVM for JDK, Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition accessible data. Note: This vulnerability applies to Java deployments, typically in clients running sandboxed Java Web Start applications or sandboxed Java applets, that load and run untrusted code (e.g., code that comes from the internet) and rely on the Java sandbox for security. This vulnerability does not apply to Java deployments, typically in servers, that load and run only trusted code (e.g., code installed by an administrator). CVSS 3.1 Base Score 2.6 (Confidentiality impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N).3d
CVE-2026-1047958.8 HIG
5.0%
——2The insights-runtime-extractor runs as a privileged DaemonSet (`hostPID: true`) that scans container processes for runtime fingerprinting. When scanning a container, the coordinator: 1. **fork()s** a child process 2. **setns()** into the target container's PID and mount namespaces 3. **fchdir()** back to an orphaned FD pointing at the extractor's own root filesystem (where `/crio.sock` is hostPath-mounted) 4. Calls **only `seteuid(target_uid)`** — changing the effective UID but leaving the **real UID and saved-set-UID at 0** and **retaining the permitted capability set** 5. The `check_no_privileged_perms()` guard inspects only the Effective capability set (so it passes), and is **skipped entirely when the target runs as uid 0** 6. The `VersionExecutable` fingerprint invokes `fpr_kind_executable` with `process.command_line[0]` — the target's argv[0], read from `/proc/<pid>/cmdline` and **fully controlled by the workload** 7. `fpr_kind_executable` calls `exec.Command(executable, "--version").Output()` — executing the **workload's own binary** inside the workload's mount namespace while **ruid=0 in the host user namespace** The executed process can call `setuid(0)` to restore full root with `CAP_SYS_ADMIN`, and inherits the orphaned cwd which resolves into the extractor container's filesystem containing the host CRI-O socket. ## Affected Code ### 1. Insufficient privilege drop (Rust — extractor coordinator) **File:** `extractor/src/insights_runtime_extractor.rs` ```rust // Lines 139-146 — seteuid-only drop, guard skipped for root containers join_process_namespaces(process.pid)?; change_dir(current_dir); switch_user(*process.uid)?; if *process.uid != 0 { perms::check_no_privileged_perms() .expect("Must not have privileged permissions to run fingerprints"); } fingerprint::run_fingerprints(&config, out_dir, &process); ``` ```rust // Lines 182-185 — only effective UID changed; ruid/suid stay 0 fn switch_user(uid: u32) -> Result<(), ScannerError> { debug!("... Becoming user: {uid}"); seteuid(uid.into()).map_err(|e| ScannerError::Errno(e)) } ``` ### 2. Execution of untrusted binary (Go — fingerprint) **File:** `fingerprints/pkg/utils/file.go` ```go // Lines 75-80 — executes a path taken verbatim from workload's argv[0] func GetExecutableVersionOutput(executable string) (string, error) { out, err := exec.Command(executable, "--version").Output() if err != nil { return "", err } return string(out), nil } ``` ### 3. Workload-controlled path forwarded (Rust — version_executable) **File:** `version_executable.rs` ```rust // Lines 29-34 — workload-controlled command_line[0] forwarded to fingerprint return Some(vec![ fpr_kind_executable, out_dir.to_string(), String::from(&process.command_line[0]), String::from(&version_executable.runtime_kind_name), ]); ``` ## Attack Pattern **Attacker:** Any tenant able to schedule a pod (unprivileged, any namespace) **Victim:** The node running the insights-runtime-extractor DaemonSet **Trigger:** Automatic — the DaemonSet scans all container processes on the node **Attack sequence:** 1. Attacker creates a pod whose process name matches a configured versioned-executable pattern (`node`, `python`, `python3`, `MainThread`, or contains `java`) 2. The pod's main binary (at the path matching argv[0]) is a malicious executable that calls `setuid(0)` to restore root 3. When the insights operator triggers a scan, the DaemonSet forks, enters the attacker's mount namespace, and executes the attacker's binary with ruid=0 4. The attacker's code regains full root with `CAP_SYS_ADMIN` in the host user namespace 5. The inherited cwd contains the host CRI-O socket → full node compromise1d
CVE-2026-1101505.5 MED
0.5%
——0Privilege elevation in Installer in Google Chrome on on Windows prior to 155.0.8059.79 allowed a local attacker to obtain sensitive information via a local program. (Chromium security severity: High)16d
CVE-2026-877095.5 MED
23.5%
——7Improper access control in Windows Host Guardian Service allows an authorized attacker to perform tampering locally.2d