PULSE
LIVE20signals / 24h
FEED
ransomdragonforce reclama a NewNet · SA · Telecommunicationransomqilin reclama a Sicc · IT · Not Foundransomqilin reclama a KLD Labs · US · Technologyransomqilin reclama a Armara · FR · Not Foundransomqilin reclama a AK Preparedness · Business Servicesransomthreeam reclama a tws-tac.net · DE · Not Foundransomincransom reclama a v-silicon.com · TW · Technologyransomincransom reclama a FAST.COM.PH · PH · Technologyransomincransom reclama a D.MAG New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Taiwan Giant · TW · Manufacturingransomincransom reclama a vedan corp · VN · Agriculture and Food Productionransomincransom reclama a reatile.co.za · ZA · Not Foundransomincransom reclama a V&P Nurseries · US · Agriculture and Food Productionransomqilin reclama a Powder River Heating & Air Conditioning · US · Consumer Servicesransomqilin reclama a Droguería Martorani · AR · Consumer Servicesransomdragonforce reclama a NewNet · SA · Telecommunicationransomqilin reclama a Sicc · IT · Not Foundransomqilin reclama a KLD Labs · US · Technologyransomqilin reclama a Armara · FR · Not Foundransomqilin reclama a AK Preparedness · Business Servicesransomthreeam reclama a tws-tac.net · DE · Not Foundransomincransom reclama a v-silicon.com · TW · Technologyransomincransom reclama a FAST.COM.PH · PH · Technologyransomincransom reclama a D.MAG New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Taiwan Giant · TW · Manufacturingransomincransom reclama a vedan corp · VN · Agriculture and Food Productionransomincransom reclama a reatile.co.za · ZA · Not Foundransomincransom reclama a V&P Nurseries · US · Agriculture and Food Productionransomqilin reclama a Powder River Heating & Air Conditioning · US · Consumer Servicesransomqilin reclama a Droguería Martorani · AR · Consumer Services
← All CVEs
CVE WatchJul 17, 2026

CVE-2026-39821

The ToASCII and ToUnicode functions incorrectly accept Punycode-encoded labels that decode to an ASCII-only label. For example, ToUnicode("x

CVSS

9.6

Critical

EPSS

0.5%

p38

KEV

Exploit Today

11

0-100

Published: May 22, 2026 · Last modified: Jul 17, 2026 · CWE-1289

EPSS · 30d
0.5%EPSS · 30 days0.5%
2026-06-302026-07-17
Technical description

The ToASCII and ToUnicode functions incorrectly accept Punycode-encoded labels that decode to an ASCII-only label. For example, ToUnicode("xn--example-.com") incorrectly returns the name "example.com" rather than an error. This behavior can lead to privilege escalation in programs using the idna package. For example, a program which performs privilege checks on the ASCII hostname may reject "example.com" but permit "xn--example-.com". If that program subsequently converts the ASCII hostname to Unicode, it will inadvertently permits access to the Unicode name "example.com".

Official references
Related CVEs
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTitleMod.
CVE-2026-477296.5 MED
77.4%
23Squid is a caching proxy for the Web. Prior to 7.6, due to an improper validation of syntactic correctness of input in the FTP gateway (src/clients/FtpGateway.cc), Squid is vulnerable to an out-of-bounds read: when a listing entry date in the TypeA or TypeB directory-listing formats is not followed by a filename, parsing was not restricted to the input buffer, so a trusted client accessing a misbehaving FTP server through Squid's gateway feature could read memory from random unrelated transactions. This issue is fixed in version 7.6.19h
CVE-2026-487106.5 MED
70.2%
21Starlette is a lightweight ASGI framework/toolkit. Prior to version 1.0.1, the HTTP `Host` request header was not validated before being used to reconstruct `request.url`. Because the routing algorithm relies on the raw HTTP path while `request.url` is rebuilt from the `Host` header, a malformed header could make `request.url.path` differ from the path that was actually requested. Middleware and endpoints that apply security restrictions based on `request.url` (rather than the raw `scope` path) could therefore be bypassed. Users should upgrade to a version greater than or equal to version 1.0.1, which validates the `Host` header against the grammar of RFC 9112 §3.2 / RFC 3986 §3.2.2 when constructing `request.url` and falls back to `scope["server"]` for malformed values.3d
CVE-2025-627189.9 CRI
63.6%
19Axios is a promise based HTTP client for the browser and Node.js. Prior to 1.15.0 and 0.31.0, Axios does not correctly handle hostname normalization when checking NO_PROXY rules. Requests to loopback addresses like localhost. (with a trailing dot) or [::1] (IPv6 literal) skip NO_PROXY matching and go through the configured proxy. This goes against what developers expect and lets attackers force requests through a proxy, even if NO_PROXY is set up to protect loopback or internal services. This issue leads to the possibility of proxy bypass and SSRF vulnerabilities allowing attackers to reach sensitive loopback or internal services despite the configured protections. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.15.0 and 0.31.0.3d
CVE-2026-338067.5 HIG
33.0%
10Impact: Fastify applications using schema.body.content for per-content-type body validation can have validation bypassed entirely by prepending a space to the Content-Type header. The body is still parsed correctly but schema validation is skipped. This is a regression introduced in fastify >= 5.3.2 by the fix for CVE-2025-32442 Patches: Upgrade to fastify v5.8.5 or later. Workarounds: None. Upgrade to the patched version.3d
CVE-2026-46644
31.8%
10Symfony Polyfill backports PHP features and provides compatibility layers for extensions and functions. From 1.17.1 until 1.38.1, symfony/polyfill-intl-idn accepts xn-- labels whose Punycode payload is empty or decodes to ASCII-only code points because Idn::process() does not enforce the UTS #46 revision 33 requirement that decoded ACE labels contain at least one non-ASCII code point. Originally unequal domain names can be regarded as equal, which can lead to blacklist bypassing, inconsistent URL parsing, and server-side request forgery in applications using the polyfill to canonicalise or compare hostnames. This issue is fixed in version 1.38.1.3d
CVE-2026-338108.2 HIG
26.2%
8When verifying a certificate chain containing excluded DNS constraints, these constraints are not correctly applied to wildcard DNS SANs which use a different case than the constraint. This only affects validation of otherwise trusted certificate chains, issued by a root CA in the VerifyOptions.Roots CertPool, or in the system certificate pool.1d