PULSE
LIVE0signals / 24h
FEED
vulnKEV agrega CVE-2023-49105 — ownCloud / ownCloudvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-53362 — Linux / KernelvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-66384 — JFrog / ArtifactoryvulnKEV agrega CVE-2021-23758 — Ajax.NET Professional / Ajax.NET ProfessionalvulnKEV agrega CVE-2015-3246 — Red Hat / LibuservulnKEV agrega CVE-2015-5287 — Red Hat / Automatic Bug Reporting ToolvulnKEV agrega CVE-2022-0995 — Linux / KernelvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-8452 — Citrix / NetScaler ADC and NetScaler GatewayvulnKEV agrega CVE-2019-1068 — Microsoft / SQL ServervulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-60004 — Gitea / GiteavulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-21962 — Oracle / HTTP Server and Oracle Weblogic Server Proxy Plug-invulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-73570 — Synacor / Zimbra Collaboration Suite (ZCS)vulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-72530 — TrueConf / ServervulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-72529 — TrueConf / ServervulnKEV agrega CVE-2023-49105 — ownCloud / ownCloudvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-53362 — Linux / KernelvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-66384 — JFrog / ArtifactoryvulnKEV agrega CVE-2021-23758 — Ajax.NET Professional / Ajax.NET ProfessionalvulnKEV agrega CVE-2015-3246 — Red Hat / LibuservulnKEV agrega CVE-2015-5287 — Red Hat / Automatic Bug Reporting ToolvulnKEV agrega CVE-2022-0995 — Linux / KernelvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-8452 — Citrix / NetScaler ADC and NetScaler GatewayvulnKEV agrega CVE-2019-1068 — Microsoft / SQL ServervulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-60004 — Gitea / GiteavulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-21962 — Oracle / HTTP Server and Oracle Weblogic Server Proxy Plug-invulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-73570 — Synacor / Zimbra Collaboration Suite (ZCS)vulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-72530 — TrueConf / ServervulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-72529 — TrueConf / Server
← All CVEs
CVE WatchJul 29, 2026

CVE-2026-44390

NLnet Labs Unbound up to and including version 1.25.0 has a vulnerability when handling replies with very large RRsets that Unbound needs to

CVSS

5.3

Medium

EPSS

0.6%

p48

KEV

Exploit Today

14

0-100

Published: May 20, 2026 · Last modified: Jul 29, 2026 · CWE-407 · CWE-1050

EPSS · 30d
0.6%EPSS · 30 days0.6%
2026-08-022026-08-30
Technical description

NLnet Labs Unbound up to and including version 1.25.0 has a vulnerability when handling replies with very large RRsets that Unbound needs to perform name compression for. Malicious upstream responses with very large RRsets with records that don't share a suffix above the root can cause Unbound to spend a considerable time applying name compression to downstream replies. This can lead to degraded performance and eventually denial of service in well orchestrated attacks. An adversary can exploit the vulnerability by querying Unbound for the specially crafted contents of a malicious zone with very large RRsets. Before Unbound replies to the query it will try to apply name compression which was an unbounded operation that could lock the CPU until the whole packet was complete. A compression limit was introduced in 1.21.1 for this but it didn't account for the case where records would not share any suffix above the root. That causes Unbound to go in a different code path because of the compression tree lookup failure and eventually not increment the compression counter for those operations. Unbound 1.25.1 contains a patch with a fix that increments the compression counter regardless of the compression tree lookup. This is a complement fix to CVE-2024-8508.

Official references
Related CVEs
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTitleMod.
CVE-2026-77831
3.5%
1Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity vulnerability in ash-project ash_paper_trail allows a user who can submit a large array attribute to a paper-trailed create or update action to cause a denial of service through excessive CPU and memory use. With full-diff change tracking, AshPaperTrail.ChangeBuilders.FullDiff.ListChange pairs each prior array element against the new list by rebuilding the remaining-elements accumulator with acc ++ [tuple] on every step, copying the growing list each time, so the pairing scales cubically in the array length. Nothing bounds the length and the value comes straight from action input, so one request carrying a large accepted {:array, _} attribute forces tens of seconds of CPU and multi-gigabyte allocations. This issue affects ash_paper_trail: from 0.1.1 before 0.7.0.1d
CVE-2026-526813.1 LOW
16.8%
5Sieve CPU resource usage is tracked in the compiled script, so an attacker that has valid credentials can reset the accounting by repeatedly changing the active script. Compiled script files are also not removed when a script is deleted or renamed. The configured Sieve CPU limit can be bypassed, allowing sustained CPU consumption, and the leftover files increase disk consumption. Both can cause degradation of service for mail delivery. Monitor system for abnormal CPU usage and disk consumption. Update to non-vulnerable version. No publicly available exploits are known.2d
CVE-2026-817227.5 HIG
27.1%
8nltk PorterStemmer in versions <= 3.10.2 (fixed in 3.10.3) contains an inefficient-algorithmic-complexity denial of service in PorterStemmer.stem(). The _is_consonant() helper walks backward over the entire run of trailing 'y' characters on every call, and _measure() invokes it for each stem position, causing O(n^2) behavior. A single ~20-50 KB untrusted token consisting of a long run of the letter 'y' followed by a matching suffix (e.g., 'ness') can pin a CPU core for seconds to minutes, causing availability impact.3d
CVE-2026-750057.5 HIG
53.9%
16Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity vulnerability in Apache APISIX. A single small request can pin a gateway worker at 100% CPU for an extended period in graphql-limit-count routes. This issue affects Apache APISIX: 3.17.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 3.18.0, which fixes the issue.2d
CVE-2026-776805.3 MED
27.1%
8An algorithmic complexity flaw exists in libsoup's HTTP Range header processing that persists after the CVE-2025-32907 fix. CVE-2025-32907 addressed memory amplification when a client repeated the same range many times in a single Range header. Commit 9bb92f7a corrected merge correctness in soup_message_headers_get_ranges_internal() in libsoup/soup-message-headers.c, but the coalescing loop still removes merged ranges using g_array_remove_index() for each coalesced element. Because GArray is contiguous, each mid-array removal performs an O(N) memmove. When many identical satisfiable ranges are supplied (for example bytes=0-0 repeated thousands of times), the loop performs O(N²) work coalescing them into a single range. The vulnerable path is reachable server-side from handle_partial_get() in libsoup/server/http1/soup-server-message-io-http1.c when a SoupServer handler returns HTTP 200 with a non-empty body. No authentication is required. The number of ranges is bounded only by the maximum request header size (~100 KiB), allowing roughly 25,000 ranges per request. Reporter measurements on libsoup HEAD containing the CVE-2025-32907 fix show ~90 ms single-core CPU per such request at the wire maximum, blocking the server's event loop for that duration. This is a CPU exhaustion / availability issue only. No memory corruption or information disclosure occurs. Affected: libsoup versions containing the CVE-2025-32907 fix but not merge request !550. Fixed upstream: MR !550 merged 2026-08-20, replacing per-element removal with O(N) in-place compaction and rejecting Range headers requesting more than 200 ranges. Upstream report: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libsoup/-/issues/538 Related: CVE-2025-329072d
CVE-2026-764015.9 MED
20.6%
6In Splunk Connect for Kafka versions below 2.2.7, an unauthenticated user who can reach the Kafka Connect Representational State Transfer (REST) API could configure timestamp extraction with a crafted regular expression and matching event data to block a Kafka Connect worker thread, stopping event delivery for the affected connector. The vulnerability is possible because timestamp extraction evaluates customer-supplied regular expressions without a time limit. For more information see Install Splunk Connect for Kafka (https://help.splunk.com/en/data-management/integrate-data-with-add-ons/splunk-connect-for-kafka/2.2/install/install-splunk-connect-for-kafka) and Data ingestion parameters for Splunk Connect for Kafka (https://help.splunk.com/en/data-management/integrate-data-with-add-ons/splunk-connect-for-kafka/2.2/overview/data-ingestion-parameters-for-splunk-connect-for-kafka) in the Splunk documentation.7d