PULSE
FEED
ransomdragonforce reclama a Inside Passage Electric Cooperative, Inc · US · Energy & Utilitiesransomscarlettgroup reclama a mahsing.com.my · MY · Hospitalityransomwhitearmor reclama a LoveSac · US · Retail & E-Commerceransompayload reclama a Glückauf-Vermessung GmbH · DE · Professional Servicesransompayload reclama a Miletic GmbH · DEransompayload reclama a Edelstahl-Mechanik GmbH · DE · Manufacturingransomwhitearmor reclama a J.B Hunt · US · Transportationransompanzer reclama a Yodingenierie · BJ · Professional Servicesransomqilin reclama a White & Case · US · Professional Servicesransomqilin reclama a Hossner-Textil GmbH · DE · Manufacturingransomwhitearmor reclama a Partido Liberal · AR · Government & Defenseransomqilin reclama a Ooredoo Myanmar · MM · Technologyransomfalcon reclama a Weitz & Luxenberg · US · Professional Servicesransomfalcon reclama a Astrana Health · US · Healthcareransomdragonforce reclama a Inside Passage Electric Cooperative, Inc · US · Energy & Utilitiesransomscarlettgroup reclama a mahsing.com.my · MY · Hospitalityransomwhitearmor reclama a LoveSac · US · Retail & E-Commerceransompayload reclama a Glückauf-Vermessung GmbH · DE · Professional Servicesransompayload reclama a Miletic GmbH · DEransompayload reclama a Edelstahl-Mechanik GmbH · DE · Manufacturingransomwhitearmor reclama a J.B Hunt · US · Transportationransompanzer reclama a Yodingenierie · BJ · Professional Servicesransomqilin reclama a White & Case · US · Professional Servicesransomqilin reclama a Hossner-Textil GmbH · DE · Manufacturingransomwhitearmor reclama a Partido Liberal · AR · Government & Defenseransomqilin reclama a Ooredoo Myanmar · MM · Technologyransomfalcon reclama a Weitz & Luxenberg · US · Professional Servicesransomfalcon reclama a Astrana Health · US · Healthcare
← All CVEs
CVE WatchOct 25, 2026

CVE-2026-48523

PyJWT is a JSON Web Token implementation in Python. From 2.9.0 to 2.12.1, there is a verifier-side algorithm allow-list bypass when jwt.deco

CVSS

5.4

Medium

EPSS

0.1%

p2

KEV

—

Exploit Today

1

0-100

Published: May 28, 2026 · Last modified: Oct 25, 2026 · CWE-347

EPSS · 30d
0.1%EPSS · 30 days0.2%
2026-09-272026-10-25
Technical description

PyJWT is a JSON Web Token implementation in Python. From 2.9.0 to 2.12.1, there is a verifier-side algorithm allow-list bypass when jwt.decode() or jwt.decode_complete() are called with a PyJWK key. The token header alg is checked against the caller-supplied algorithms allow-list, but signature verification is performed with the algorithm bound to the PyJWK object instead of the header algorithm. An attacker who controls a registered JWK/JWKS private key can sign with a disallowed algorithm, advertise an allowed algorithm in the JWT header, and still be accepted. The issue affects the documented PyJWKClient.get_signing_key_from_jwt(...) flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.13.0.

Official references
Related CVEs
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTitleMod.
CVE-2026-568378.6 HIG
8.3%
——2PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. From version 4.6.56 to before version 4.6.59, PraisonAI's LinearBot starts a public webhook listener on 0.0.0.0 and treats LINEAR_WEBHOOK_SECRET as optional. When the secret is absent, startup only logs a warning and _handle_webhook() skips Linear-Signature verification entirely. An unauthenticated network caller who can reach the webhook endpoint can submit a forged Linear-Event: AgentSession request. The forged request is parsed, scheduled for background processing, dispatched to _handle_agent_session(), and passed into BotSessionManager.chat(). The bot then attempts to post the agent response back to Linear under the configured bot token. The PoV is offline and deterministic. It does not contact Linear. It calls the webhook handler directly, monkey-patches the outbound Linear comment path, and proves both sides of the boundary. This issue has been patched in version 4.6.59.3d
CVE-2026-89317—
3.9%
——1gose parsed the JWS `crit` header into `JwsHeader.Crit` and then never read it. RFC 7515 §4.1.11 requires a recipient to reject a JWS whose listed critical extension parameters it does not understand. gose implements no header extensions, so every token carrying a non-empty `crit` should have been rejected — and none were.3d
CVE-2026-1146157.4 HIG
2.4%
——1Authlib is a Python library which builds OAuth and OpenID Connect servers. From 1.3.1 until 1.9.0, OctKey.import_key() checks asymmetric-key markers only at byte zero while Authlib's PEM loaders accept leading whitespace, comments, or a byte-order mark. In deployments that use the documented mixed algorithm registry and already configure verification with PEM or certificate bytes containing such a prefix, an unauthenticated attacker who knows those same public-key bytes can use them as an HMAC secret and forge HS256 tokens with arbitrary identity or authorization claims. This is a bypass of the remediation for CVE-2024-37568. The module-level jwt object reaches OctKey.import_key() in authlib/jose/rfc7518/oct_key.py, where POSSIBLE_UNSAFE_KEYS fails to identify prefixed asymmetric key material. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.0.3d
CVE-2026-1153747.1 HIG
7.9%
——2Incus 7.0.0 before 7.0.2 and 7.1.0 before 7.5.0 contains a signature verification flaw in its built-in S3 server that allows presigned URL holders to inject unsigned x-amz-* headers. Attackers can add an unsigned X-Amz-Copy-Source header to a presigned upload URL to copy other bucket objects onto the granted key, disclosing their contents and ETags.3d
CVE-2026-87947—
3.4%
——1Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature vulnerability in Drupal SAML SSO - Service Provider allows Signature Spoof. This issue affects SAML SSO - Service Provider versions: from 0.0.0 to 3.2.0.4d
CVE-2026-84918—
4.8%
——1Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature vulnerability in Drupal Monobank payment API allows Signature Spoof. This issue affects Monobank payment API versions: from 0.0.0 to 1.0.3.4d