PULSE
LIVE0signals / 24h
FEED
vulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-76461 — Cisco / Secure Email GatewayvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-84869 — ConnectWise / ScreenConnectvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-42016 — JFrog / ArtifactoryvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-42018 — JFrog / ArtifactoryvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-85706 — GitLab / Community Edition and Enterprise EditionvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-86060 — MikroTik / RouterOSvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-67277 — MikroTik / RouterOSvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-19490 — Citrix / NetScalervulnKEV agrega CVE-2025-25249 — Fortinet / Multiple ProductsvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-87491 — Google / Chromium V8vulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-20079 — Cisco / Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) and Security Cloud Control (SCC) Firewall ManagementvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-75650 — Adobe / Commerce and MagentovulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-81963 — Microsoft / WindowsvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-86218 — N-able / N-centralvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-76461 — Cisco / Secure Email GatewayvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-84869 — ConnectWise / ScreenConnectvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-42016 — JFrog / ArtifactoryvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-42018 — JFrog / ArtifactoryvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-85706 — GitLab / Community Edition and Enterprise EditionvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-86060 — MikroTik / RouterOSvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-67277 — MikroTik / RouterOSvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-19490 — Citrix / NetScalervulnKEV agrega CVE-2025-25249 — Fortinet / Multiple ProductsvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-87491 — Google / Chromium V8vulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-20079 — Cisco / Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) and Security Cloud Control (SCC) Firewall ManagementvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-75650 — Adobe / Commerce and MagentovulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-81963 — Microsoft / WindowsvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-86218 — N-able / N-central
← All CVEs
CVE WatchSep 15, 2026

CVE-2026-50166

Kuma is a modern Envoy-based service mesh that can run on every cloud across both Kubernetes and VMs. Prior to 2.7.26, 2.9.16, 2.11.14, 2.12

CVSS

No CVSS

EPSS

KEV

Exploit Today

0-100

Published: Sep 15, 2026 · Last modified: Sep 15, 2026 · CWE-295

EPSS · 30d

Not enough EPSS history yet.

Technical description

Kuma is a modern Envoy-based service mesh that can run on every cloud across both Kubernetes and VMs. Prior to 2.7.26, 2.9.16, 2.11.14, 2.12.11, and 2.13.7, a kumactl profile manually configured for an HTTPS control plane without --ca-cert-file disables TLS peer verification and sends API tokens over the unverified connection. An attacker on the network path can intercept user or administrator API tokens and act against the control plane as the compromised user. The default local profile is unaffected because it uses plain HTTP. This issue is fixed in versions 2.7.26, 2.9.16, 2.11.14, 2.12.11, and 2.13.7.

Official references
Related CVEs
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTitleMod.
CVE-2026-52724
Kuma is a modern Envoy-based service mesh that can run on every cloud across both Kubernetes and VMs. Prior to 2.7.26, 2.9.16, 2.11.14, 2.12.11, and 2.13.7, Universal mode kuma-dp connections to an HTTPS control plane disable TLS peer verification when --ca-cert-file is not supplied and KUMA_CONTROL_PLANE_CA_CERT is unset. The dataplane authentication token is sent over the unverified connection, allowing an on-path attacker to intercept the token, impersonate the control plane, inject a forged bootstrap configuration, and take over the proxy. Standard Kubernetes installations created by kumactl install control-plane or the official Helm chart are unaffected because the mutating admission webhook injects KUMA_CONTROL_PLANE_CA_CERT into each sidecar. This issue is fixed in versions 2.7.26, 2.9.16, 2.11.14, 2.12.11, and 2.13.7.10h
CVE-2026-868894.8 MED
0A certificate validation issue was addressed with improved certificate validation. This issue is fixed in macOS Golden Gate 27, macOS Sequoia 15.8, macOS Tahoe 26.7. An attacker in a privileged network position may be able to intercept network traffic.1h
CVE-2026-906233.7 LOW
18.3%
6A weakness has been identified in andreashappe cochise up to 0.4.1. Affected is the function asyncssh.connect of the file src/cochise/ssh_connection.py of the component SSH Host Key Handler. Executing a manipulation can lead to improper certificate validation. The attack may be launched remotely. The attack requires a high level of complexity. The exploitability is told to be difficult. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.1d
CVE-2026-906518.1 HIG
8.6%
3Socket Firewall (socketdev/socket-registry-firewall) in registry mode before 2.0.0 does not verify upstream TLS certificates by default. When the api_ssl_verify and upstream_ssl_verify configuration keys are omitted from socket.yml, the generated configuration sets SOCKET_API_SSL_VERIFY='false' and UPSTREAM_SSL_VERIFY='false', and the OpenResty/Lua HTTP client used for outbound requests accepts any certificate, including self-signed and otherwise untrusted certificates, without validating the chain. An attacker positioned to intercept traffic between Socket Firewall and the Socket API or an upstream package registry can present a crafted certificate and modify responses in transit, including substituting malicious package content or altering the allow/block decisions the firewall enforces. Setting api_ssl_verify: true and upstream_ssl_verify: true enables verification; however, in versions before 1.1.334, the generated nginx configuration did not emit lua_ssl_trusted_certificate, and thus verification could not be used successfully without manually patching the generated configuration. Version 2.0.0 changes the default for both settings to true.1d
CVE-2026-906477.4 HIG
3.4%
1ASE/Kalkitech ASE2000 V2 Communication Test Set 2.35 through 2.37 on Windows contains an improper certificate validation vulnerability in the IEC 60870-5-104 TLS client (Task Mode). This allows a network-positioned attacker to bypass certificate validation via a certificate with multiple simultaneous faults, enabling a Man-in-the-Middle attack on protected communications.8h
CVE-2026-90452
0.5%
0Requests from the reverse proxy to the identity-provider service for token discovery, introspection, and credential exchange do not verify the identity provider's server certificate. An attacker positioned on the network path between the proxy and the identity provider could impersonate the identity provider and issue forged authentication tokens accepted by the deployment.2d