PULSE
FEED
ransombooba project reclama a Aesthetic Specialty Centre · PK · Healthcareransombooba project reclama a City of Big Spring · US · Government & Defenseransombooba project reclama a KING FAMILY MEDICAL · US · Healthcareransombooba project reclama a Charter Township of Commerce · US · Government & Defenseransombooba project reclama a Regent Christian Online Academy · CA · Educationransomaurora reclama a GreenbergFarrow · Professional Servicesransomwallstreet reclama a Bristol City Council · GB · Government & Defenseransomqilin reclama a NuVista Federal Credit Union · US · Financial Servicesransomqilin reclama a Hawaii Law Enforcement Fedral Credit Union · US · Financial Servicesransomn0n reclama a Company #111 · AEransomeverest reclama a OR Technology · Technologyransomeverest reclama a Burris & MacOmber · Professional Servicesransomeverest reclama a Energy Storage Terminal in Singapore · SG · Energy & Utilitiesransomeverest reclama a Point Robotics · Technologyransombooba project reclama a Aesthetic Specialty Centre · PK · Healthcareransombooba project reclama a City of Big Spring · US · Government & Defenseransombooba project reclama a KING FAMILY MEDICAL · US · Healthcareransombooba project reclama a Charter Township of Commerce · US · Government & Defenseransombooba project reclama a Regent Christian Online Academy · CA · Educationransomaurora reclama a GreenbergFarrow · Professional Servicesransomwallstreet reclama a Bristol City Council · GB · Government & Defenseransomqilin reclama a NuVista Federal Credit Union · US · Financial Servicesransomqilin reclama a Hawaii Law Enforcement Fedral Credit Union · US · Financial Servicesransomn0n reclama a Company #111 · AEransomeverest reclama a OR Technology · Technologyransomeverest reclama a Burris & MacOmber · Professional Servicesransomeverest reclama a Energy Storage Terminal in Singapore · SG · Energy & Utilitiesransomeverest reclama a Point Robotics · Technology
← All CVEs
CVE WatchOct 19, 2026

CVE-2026-53145

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/gem: Try to fix change_handle ioctl, attempt 4 [airlied: just adde

CVSS

7.8

High

EPSS

0.1%

p3

KEV

—

Exploit Today

1

0-100

Published: Jun 25, 2026 · Last modified: Oct 19, 2026 · CWE-367

EPSS · 30d
0.1%EPSS · 30 days0.1%
2026-09-282026-10-26
Technical description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/gem: Try to fix change_handle ioctl, attempt 4 [airlied: just added some comments on how to reenable] On-list because the cat is out of the bag and we're clearly not good enough to figure this out in private. The story thus far: 5e28b7b94408 ("drm: Set old handle to NULL before prime swap in change_handle") tried to fix a race condition between the gem_close and gem_change_handle ioctls, but got a few things wrong: - There's a confusion with the local variable handle, which is actually the new handle, and so the two-stage trick was actually applied to the wrong idr slot. 7164d78559b0 ("drm/gem: fix race between change_handle and handle_delete") tried to fix that by adding yet another code block, but forgot to add the error handling. Which meant we now have two paths, both kinda wrong. - dc366607c41c ("drm: Replace old pointer to new idr") tried to apply another fix, but inconsistently, again because of the handle confusion - this would be the right fix (kinda, somewhat, it's a mess) if we'd do the two-stage approach for the new handle. Except that wasn't the intent of the original fix. We also didn't have an igt merged for the original ioctl, which is a big no-go. This was attempted to address off-list in the original bugfix, and amd QA people claimed the bug was fixed now. Very clearly that's not the case. Here's my attempt to sort this out: - Rename the local variable to new_handle, the old aliasing with args->handle is just too dangerously confusing. - Merge the gem obj lookup with the two-stage idr_replace so that we avoid getting ourselves confused there. - This means we don't have a surplus temporary reference anymore, only an inherited from the idr. A concurrent gem_close on the new_handle could steal that. Fix that with the same two-stage approach create_tail uses. This is a bit overkill as documented in the comment, but I also don't trust my ability to understand this all correctly, so go with the established pattern we have from other ioctls instead for maximum paranoia. - Adjust error paths. I've tried to make the error and success paths common, because they are identical except for which handle is removed and on which we call idr_replace to (re)install the object again. But that made things messier to read, so I've left it at the more verbose version, which unfortunately hides the symmetry in the entire code flow a bit. - While at it, also replace the 7 space indent with 1 tab. And finally, because I flat out don't trust my abilities here at all anymore: - Disable the ioctl until we have the igt situation and everything else sorted out on-list and with full consensus. v2: Sashiko noticed that I didn't handle the error path for idr_replace correctly, it must be checked with IS_ERR_OR_NULL like in gem_handle_delete. So yeah, definitely should just the existing paths 1:1 because this is endless amounts of tricky. Also add the Fixes: line for the original ioctl, I forgot that too.

Official references
Related CVEs
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTitleMod.
CVE-2026-77059—
—
——0boneIO Black contains a TOCTOU race condition in the create_timedatectl_sudoers_file() function in boneio/webui/routes/timezone_sudoers.py. The function writes sudoers rules to a predictable temporary file, validates them, then installs them with root privileges. A local attacker can exploit the race window between validation and installation to substitute malicious content, or use the predictable filename for symlink attacks, resulting in arbitrary sudoers rule injection and local privilege escalation to root. This issue was fixed in version 1.6.0.1d
CVE-2026-755245.4 MED
8.1%
——2OpenReception's appointment booking software provides an end-to-end encrypted appointment booking platform. Prior to version 2.2.2, an attacker overbooks an agent, placing multiple appointments into a single time slot that the system is designed to keep exclusive. The number of overlapping appointments equals the number of concurrent requests, and one booking token is enough because the token is consumed after the insert. This results in the integrity of the booking-calendar breaking and availability being denied to other clients. This issue has been patched in version 2.2.2.1d
CVE-2026-1054816.5 MED
23.2%
——7A flaw in Node.js HTTP Agent connection reuse can cause a client to accept as valid a response that was sent before the client has sent the request. This is an incomplete fix of CVE-2026-48931. The guard that destroys idle keep-alive sockets when unexpected data arrives only runs when the event loop polls for I/O. If an unsolicited response has already reached the socket but has not been read yet when the socket is handed to a new request, for example because the event loop was busy with synchronous work, the guard is removed without seeing it and the data is parsed as the response to the new request. This vulnerability affects Node.js **26.x**, **24.x**, and **22.x**.4d
CVE-2026-571147.2 HIG
8.2%
——2PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. From version 4.5.126 to before version 4.6.59, PraisonAI's Async Jobs API validates webhook_url when a job request is parsed and again when the internal Job object is constructed. That validation blocks direct loopback/private targets, but it is not bound to the later network request. When a job completes, _send_webhook() passes the original hostname to httpx.AsyncClient.post() with no send-time validation, IP pinning, or guarded transport. An attacker-controlled hostname can therefore resolve to a public IP during Pydantic validation and later resolve to loopback/private/cloud-metadata infrastructure during webhook delivery. This bypasses the intended SSRF guard in current supported releases. This appears to be an incomplete fix / patch bypass for GHSA-8frj-8q3m-xhgm. This issue has been patched in version 4.6.59.4d
CVE-2026-1129413.3 LOW
2.7%
——1filelock is a platform-independent file lock for Python. From 4.1.0 until 4.2.1, SoftReadWriteLock and AsyncSoftReadWriteLock cache a successful check of the <path>.rw lock tree and resolve its names again during later record operations, allowing another local user who can replace that tree after the first acquisition to redirect lock-record writes into directories writable by the lock user. This issue is fixed in version 4.2.1.6d
CVE-2026-1129376.1 MED
5.3%
——2filelock is a platform-independent file lock for Python. From 4.1.0 until 4.2.1, ReadWriteLock can remove a randomized .filelock-* private-hard-link directory during cleanup, allowing another local user with rename access in a non-sticky parent to observe a live name or forge a dead-owner sweep name and rename a sibling directory onto it for deletion. This issue is fixed in version 4.2.1.6d