CVE WatchAug 28, 2026

CVE-2026-54745

Kubeflow Pipelines enables users to build and deploy portable, scalable machine learning workflows. Prior to 2.17.0, the Kubeflow Pipelines

CVSS

10.0

Critical

EPSS

—

KEV

—

Exploit Today

—

0-100

Published: Aug 28, 2026 · Last modified: Aug 28, 2026 · CWE-284 · CWE-918

EPSS · 30d

Not enough EPSS history yet.

Technical description

Kubeflow Pipelines enables users to build and deploy portable, scalable machine learning workflows. Prior to 2.17.0, the Kubeflow Pipelines frontend exposes an unauthenticated server-side request forgery vulnerability through the /_proxy/ route in frontend/server/proxy-middleware.ts. The _routePathWithReferer() function accepts an arbitrary attacker-controlled HTTP or HTTPS target and passes its origin to createProxyMiddleware without a host allowlist or filtering for loopback, link-local, RFC1918, or cluster-local addresses. The route remains outside the authorization middleware when ENABLE_AUTHZ=true and is reachable through /apis/v1beta1/_proxy/, /apis/v2beta1/_proxy/, /pipeline/apis/v1beta1/_proxy/, and /pipeline/apis/v2beta1/_proxy/, including through a crafted Referer header. Requests can forward attacker-controlled methods, headers such as Authorization, Cookie, and X-Forwarded-For, and POST bodies to reachable internal services, while returning the upstream response to the unauthenticated client. This can expose cloud metadata credentials, Kubernetes or service APIs, and other cluster-internal endpoints to unauthorized read or modification. This issue is fixed in version 2.17.0.

Official references

Related CVEs

CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTitleMod.

CVE-2026-55678—

—

———Arc is an open, SQL-native time-series database for telemetry. From 26.02.1 until 26.06.2, Arc Enterprise clustering accepts cluster join requests without authentication when cluster.enabled is true but cluster.shared_secret is not configured. The defaults in internal/config/config.go set cluster.enabled to false, cluster.cluster_name to arc-cluster, cluster.coordinator_addr to :9100, cluster.shared_secret to an empty value, and cluster.tls_enabled to false, while cmd/arc/main.go requires cluster.shared_secret only when cluster.replication_enabled is true. JoinRequest in internal/cluster/protocol/messages.go accepts attacker-controlled node_id, role, raft_addr, api_addr, and coord_addr values, plus optional auth_nonce, auth_timestamp, and auth_hmac fields. The join path in internal/cluster/coordinator.go validates HMAC authentication only when the configured shared secret is non-empty and otherwise proceeds after only the cluster-name check. An accepted node is marked healthy, added as a Raft voter or registered locally, and becomes available through internal/cluster/registry.go to the routing logic in internal/cluster/router.go. The forwardRequest path in internal/cluster/router.go builds its target from node.APIAddress and copies Authorization and x-api-key headers with the request, so a rogue node selected for a forwarded query or write can receive authentication headers, request bodies, database and measurement names, and operational metadata. Heartbeat in internal/cluster/protocol/messages.go also lacks HMAC fields, and internal/cluster/coordinator.go updates node state from supplied node_id and state values without authentication. An unauthenticated network attacker who can reach the coordinator port and knows the cluster name can therefore become a trusted cluster node, mutate cluster membership, be submitted as a Raft voter, intercept topology-dependent forwarded requests, divert or forge operations, and blackhole or delay traffic. The default standalone configuration is not reachable because cluster.enabled is false, but Enterprise cluster deployments with clustering enabled and no shared secret are affected. This issue is fixed in version 26.06.2.9h CVE-2026-185454.3 MED

—

———IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.1 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks.9h CVE-2026-822897.4 HIG

—

———Gitingest through 0.3.1 fails to properly validate hostnames in _validate_host, accepting any host with a git., gitlab., or github. prefix regardless of known-hosts list membership. Attackers can submit URLs with attacker-controlled hostnames to trigger outbound connections to arbitrary hosts and disclose GitHub personal access tokens via HTTP basic credentials.9h CVE-2026-822858.2 HIG

—

———bisheng through 2.6.0-fix2 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the POST /api/v1/workflow/report/callback endpoint that lacks authentication and applies no URL scheme restrictions or host filtering. Unauthenticated attackers can supply arbitrary URLs to enumerate internal network services and cloud metadata endpoints, then retrieve captured responses from object storage using caller-supplied object names.11h CVE-2026-822707.5 HIG

—

———Portkey AI Gateway through 1.15.2 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the /v1/proxy/* route that lacks requestValidator middleware. Attackers can set the x-portkey-custom-host header to internal addresses and forward requests with Authorization headers to reach internal services and exfiltrate provider API keys.11h CVE-2026-822687.5 HIG

—

———Qwen-Agent through 0.0.34 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the document parsing path that treats caller-supplied paths as URLs without scheme restriction or host validation. Attackers can reach the unauthenticated Gradio interface to make the server issue HTTP requests to arbitrary internal addresses including metadata services and read retrieved content through parsed document output.9h