CVE WatchJul 24, 2026

CVE-2026-5808

A vulnerability was detected in openstatusHQ openstatus up to 1b678e71a85961ae319cbb214a8eae634059330c. This impacts an unknown function of

CVSS

4.3

Medium

EPSS

0.3%

p20

KEV

—

Exploit Today

0-100

Published: Apr 8, 2026 · Last modified: Jul 24, 2026 · CWE-79 · CWE-94

EPSS · 30d

0.3%EPSS · 30 days0.3%

2026-08-082026-09-05

Technical description

A vulnerability was detected in openstatusHQ openstatus up to 1b678e71a85961ae319cbb214a8eae634059330c. This impacts an unknown function of the file apps/dashboard/src/app/(dashboard)/onboarding/client.tsx of the component Onboarding Endpoint. The manipulation of the argument callbackURL results in cross site scripting. The attack may be launched remotely. This product operates on a rolling release basis, ensuring continuous delivery. Consequently, there are no version details for either affected or updated releases. The patch is identified as 43d9b2b9ef8ae1a98f9bdc8a9f86d6a3dfaa2dfb. It is advisable to implement a patch to correct this issue. The vendor was contacted early, responded in a very professional manner and quickly released a fixed version of the affected product.

Official references

Related CVEs

CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTitleMod.

CVE-2026-862428.1 HIG

—

——0Bifrost HTTP transport before 2.0.0 accepts an enabled custom plugin whose path is an HTTP URL through unauthenticated POST /api/plugins when management authentication is disabled (the default, governance.auth_config.is_enabled=false). The shared-object loader treats an http-prefixed path as a download URL, writes the body to a temporary .so, and passes it to Go's plugin.Open. After a successful open, optional Init runs immediately with the supplied config as the Bifrost process user. On documented dynamically linked builds (DYNAMIC=1 / no static-link flags), which the vendor requires for custom Go plugins, plugin.Open is expected to succeed and this is unauthenticated remote code execution. On the published statically linked Docker image, plugin.Open fails with Dynamic loading not supported, so that build class is only server-side request forgery. Attack complexity is High because the attacker cannot force RCE on the default static image and a loadable plugin must match the host Go version, OS, architecture, and linkage. The 1.6.x HTTP transport line through 1.6.11 does not contain the fix.2h CVE-2026-861813.5 LOW

—

——0A vulnerability was found in code-projects Task Management System 1.0. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file /user/UpdateUserProfile.php of the component User Profile Update. The manipulation of the argument lname results in cross site scripting. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used.5h CVE-2026-842197.5 HIG

—

——0The Kirki WordPress plugin before 6.3.0 does not hold back every spelling of the HTML entities it decodes when rendering, allowing unauthenticated users to store JavaScript in a comment which then runs in the session of anyone viewing a page that displays it, including an administrator, and on every page of the site when its header or footer is built to show comments.3h CVE-2026-840286.8 MED

—

——0The Bold Page Builder WordPress plugin before 5.9.9 does not sanitise and escape a shortcode attribute before outputting it in an HTML attribute, allowing users with the Contributor role and above to inject arbitrary web scripts that execute when a user views the affected page.3h CVE-2026-86197—

—

——0Grav before 2.0.20 contains a cross-site scripting vulnerability in the Twig sandbox policy that allowlists addJs and addCss methods on Grav\Common\Assets without proper output escaping. Page editors can inject arbitrary script by registering malicious assets or injecting attributes, which are rendered unescaped into document head tags and executed for all visitors including administrators.1d CVE-2026-861887.2 HIG

—

——0AVideo with YPTSocket plugin enabled contains a cross-site scripting vulnerability allowing unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary JavaScript in other users' browsers via the websocket callback mechanism. Attackers can send crafted socket messages with callback names resolving to global functions like avideoConfirmHTML that accept untrusted data and assign it to innerHTML, achieving script execution in the victim's origin without authentication or user interaction.1d