PULSE
FEED
ransomn0n reclama a Ingelectus Innovative Electrical Solutions S.L. · ES · Energy & Utilitiesransomwhitearmor reclama a Gamdom · Otherransomfalcon reclama a Beasley Allen Law Firm · US · Professional Servicesransomqilin reclama a RaceTrakka · AU · Retail & E-Commerceransomqilin reclama a Smith Feddeler & Smith · US · Professional Servicesransomqilin reclama a Delta Electric Power Association · US · Energy & Utilitiesransomqilin reclama a Bangor Wholesale Laminates · GB · Manufacturingransomqilin reclama a TeleTronic · ES · Technologyransomqilin reclama a FIRMENGRUPPE APPL Holding GmbH · DE · Otherransomqilin reclama a Premier Medical Group · US · Healthcareransomqilin reclama a Zachary Confections · US · Retail & E-Commerceransomqilin reclama a THOMAS JORDAN, P.A · US · Professional Servicesransomqilin reclama a Five Star Sheets · US · Retail & E-Commerceransomqilin reclama a Power Funding · GB · Financial Servicesransomn0n reclama a Ingelectus Innovative Electrical Solutions S.L. · ES · Energy & Utilitiesransomwhitearmor reclama a Gamdom · Otherransomfalcon reclama a Beasley Allen Law Firm · US · Professional Servicesransomqilin reclama a RaceTrakka · AU · Retail & E-Commerceransomqilin reclama a Smith Feddeler & Smith · US · Professional Servicesransomqilin reclama a Delta Electric Power Association · US · Energy & Utilitiesransomqilin reclama a Bangor Wholesale Laminates · GB · Manufacturingransomqilin reclama a TeleTronic · ES · Technologyransomqilin reclama a FIRMENGRUPPE APPL Holding GmbH · DE · Otherransomqilin reclama a Premier Medical Group · US · Healthcareransomqilin reclama a Zachary Confections · US · Retail & E-Commerceransomqilin reclama a THOMAS JORDAN, P.A · US · Professional Servicesransomqilin reclama a Five Star Sheets · US · Retail & E-Commerceransomqilin reclama a Power Funding · GB · Financial Services
← All CVEs
CVE WatchOct 19, 2026

CVE-2026-63996

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ethtool: cmis: require exact CDB reply length Malicious SFP module cou

CVSS

7.8

High

EPSS

0.1%

p3

KEV

—

Exploit Today

1

0-100

Published: Jul 19, 2026 · Last modified: Oct 19, 2026 · CWE-787

EPSS · 30d
0.1%EPSS · 30 days0.1%
2026-09-272026-10-25
Technical description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ethtool: cmis: require exact CDB reply length Malicious SFP module could respond with rpl_len longer than what cmis_cdb_process_reply() expected, leading to OOB writes. Malicious HW is a bit theoretical but some modules may just be buggy and/or the reads may occasionally get corrupted, so let's protect the kernel. The existing check protects from short replies. We need to protect from long ones, too. All callers that pass a non-zero rpl_exp_len cast the reply payload to a fixed-layout struct and read fields at fixed offsets, with no version negotiation or short-reply handling: - cmis_cdb_validate_password() - cmis_cdb_module_features_get() - cmis_fw_update_fw_mng_features_get() so let's assume that responses longer than expected do not have to be handled gracefully here. Add a warning message to make the debug easier in case my understanding is wrong... Note that page_data->length (argument of kmalloc) comes from last arg to ethtool_cmis_page_init() which is rpl_exp_len. Note2 that AIs also like to point out overflows in args->req.payload itself (which is a fixed-size 120 B buffer, on the stack), but callers should be reading structs defined by the standard, so protecting from requests for more data than max seem like defensive programming.

Official references
Related CVEs
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTitleMod.
CVE-2026-1165437.5 HIG
—
———Open5GS 1.3.0 through 2.8.0 contains a heap out-of-bounds write vulnerability in parse_multipart() that allows unauthenticated attackers to corrupt memory by supplying an empty multipart boundary. Attackers can send a single crafted multipart/related request to the SBI interface of any network function, overflowing the lookbehind buffer and crashing it.8h
CVE-2026-1165395.9 MED
—
———Netty netty-tcnative before 2.0.84.Final contains a heap buffer overflow vulnerability in the tcn_write_to_bytebuffer BIO callback caused by failing to wrap the non-application ring buffer write index. Remote TLS peers can drive handshake, renegotiation, or post-handshake messages into this buffer, triggering an out-of-bounds memcpy that crashes the JVM process.7h
CVE-2026-829477.1 HIG
—
——0SOEM version 2.0.0 and earlier contains multiple vulnerabilities in frame processing where a malicious device can cause the master to read data outside allocated buffers. The software uses length and offset values from device messages without validating them against buffer sizes. This can cause the master to access invalid memory locations, potentially disclosing sensitive information or causing crashes.10h
CVE-2026-829456.5 MED
—
——0SOEM version 2.0.0 and earlier contains a vulnerability during device configuration where a malicious device can cause memory corruption. The software writes configuration data to a fixed-size array without checking if the array index exceeds its maximum size of EC_MAXFMMU entries. A device presenting more than EC_MAXFMMU configuration blocks can force writes beyond the array boundary, corrupting adjacent memory structures and potentially disrupting subsequent operations.9h
CVE-2026-829448.8 HIG
—
——0SOEM version 2.0.0 and earlier contains a vulnerability in multi-segment data transfers where a malicious device can overflow memory buffers. The software checks the total size only once at the beginning, but doesn't track the cumulative size as multiple segments arrive. An attacker can declare a small initial size to pass validation, then send additional segments that exceed the allocated buffer. This allows the attacker to write controlled data beyond buffer boundaries, potentially enabling code execution.10h
CVE-2026-703888.3 HIG
—
——0SOEM version 2.0.0 and earlier contains vulnerabilities where a malicious device on the network can send specially crafted messages that cause the master to write data outside allocated memory boundaries. The software performs arithmetic on message length values without proper validation, allowing negative or extremely large values to bypass safety checks. This can corrupt memory and potentially allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code on the master system.10h