CVE-2026-64993
Dell RVTools versions prior to 4.8.1, contains an improper certificate validation vulnerability in the collector. A remote unauthenticated a
CVSS
6.8
Medium
EPSS
—
KEV
—
Exploit Today
—
0-100
Published: Aug 6, 2026 · Last modified: Aug 6, 2026 · CWE-295
Not enough EPSS history yet.
Dell RVTools versions prior to 4.8.1, contains an improper certificate validation vulnerability in the collector. A remote unauthenticated attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability leading to loss of confidentiality and integrity.
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTitleMod.
CVE-2026-167926.1 MED0.1%
——0An improper certificate validation vulnerability was reported in multiple Lenovo XClarity Orchestrator (LXCO) 2.2.0 microservices that could allow an adjacent network attacker to intercept sensitive communications by performing a machine-in-the-middle attack against HTTPS connections during TLS certificate validation under certain circumstances.1dCVE-2026-69248—8.3%
——2cryptography is a package designed to expose cryptographic primitives and recipes to Python developers. Prior to 49.0.0, if an intermediate constrained CA permits the DNS name foo.example.com, and the leaf certificate has a wildcard in its DNS SAN of *.example.com, python-cryptography's verifier accepts which allows escaping outside of the permitted names. The core issue is in DNSConstraint::matches, where a wildcard pattern was treated as matching a more-specific permitted constraint even though *.example.com can expand to sibling names such as bar.example.com outside foo.example.com. This allows acceptance of an invalid certificate chain. This issue is fixed in 49.0.0.2dCVE-2026-675987.4 HIG5.9%
——2Emlog Pro through 2.6.23 contains a disabled TLS certificate validation vulnerability in include/service/ai.php that allows network-adjacent attackers to intercept outbound HTTPS requests to configured LLM providers by presenting arbitrary TLS certificates, as CURLOPT_SSL_VERIFYPEER and CURLOPT_SSL_VERIFYHOST are unconditionally disabled across sendStream(), sendImageRequest(), send(), and fetchSearchHtml() with no option to re-enable verification. Attackers can perform man-in-the-middle interception to extract Authorization Bearer API keys from every AI request and inject crafted AI responses that may be acted upon by the tool-call execution pipeline, including the query_database and update_config tool handlers.2dCVE-2025-9291—7.8%
——2A
certification validation weakness exists in communication between affected
Omada devices and cloud controllers. Certificate identity verification does not
adequately validate that a presented certificate corresponds to the expected
cloud controller hostname, which may allow certificate validation protections
to be bypassed under specific conditions.
Successful
exploitation may allow interception or modification of communication between
affected devices and cloud controllers.8hCVE-2026-180897.5 HIG7.2%
——2Net::SAML2 versions before 0.86 for Perl allow SAML authentication bypass by verifying responses against the response-embedded certificate in verify_xml when no trust anchor is configured.
verify_xml in Net::SAML2::Role::VerifyXML runs "return if !$anchors && !$cacert;" as soon as the XML::Sig check succeeds, and that check uses the X.509 certificate taken from the response's own dsig:KeyInfo/dsig:X509Certificate element, so an unanchored response is checked only against the key it carries. Binding::POST declares cacert as an optional Maybe[Str] with no default, so a POST binding built without one takes that path, and _verify_encrypted_assertion returns early the same way with "return $xml unless $cacert;".
Any caller that constructs Binding::POST or calls Assertion->new_from_xml without a cacert, cert_text, or anchors argument accepts a response signed by an attacker generated key whose self-signed certificate is embedded in that response, authenticating an arbitrary assertion.3dCVE-2026-0392—0.0%
——0eParakstītājs 3.0 for Windows before version
1.10.0 retrieves and executes its automatic updates over a channel that is not
authenticated or integrity-protected. On each launch the application fetches an
update descriptor (XML) over TLS but accepts any TLS certificate (a permissive
TrustManager and a HostnameVerifier that always returns true), does not verify
any digital signature on the update descriptor, and does not verify the
Authenticode signature or a checksum of the downloaded installer before running
it. A man-in-the-middle attacker able to redirect www.eparaksts.lv can serve a
crafted update descriptor pointing to an attacker-controlled executable, which
the client downloads and executes, resulting in arbitrary code execution on the
victim host.2d