PULSE
LIVE16signals / 24h
FEED
ransomgenesis reclama a **E*** · US · Not Foundransomorova reclama a Ganzhou Xinye Craft Co., Ltd. · HK · Manufacturingransompanzer reclama a Xpress Tech · Technologyransomqilin reclama a G.M.A. GRANDI MARCHE AUTOMOBILI - S.R.L · IT · Transportationransomqilin reclama a Crown Group · PK · Otherransomdragonforce reclama a QPC Global · GB · Otherransominterlock reclama a AngMar Companies · Not Foundransompayload reclama a B&B Hydraulik · DE · Manufacturingransompayload reclama a Stücheli Architekten · CH · Professional Servicesransompayload reclama a Baya Technologies · Technologyransomkrybit reclama a www.kilpi-koskinen.fi · FI · Otherransomkrybit reclama a www.apsanet.com.ar · AR · Professional Servicesransomqilin reclama a Service Evaluation Concepts · US · Professional Servicesransomqilin reclama a tommer construction · US · Manufacturingransomgenesis reclama a **E*** · US · Not Foundransomorova reclama a Ganzhou Xinye Craft Co., Ltd. · HK · Manufacturingransompanzer reclama a Xpress Tech · Technologyransomqilin reclama a G.M.A. GRANDI MARCHE AUTOMOBILI - S.R.L · IT · Transportationransomqilin reclama a Crown Group · PK · Otherransomdragonforce reclama a QPC Global · GB · Otherransominterlock reclama a AngMar Companies · Not Foundransompayload reclama a B&B Hydraulik · DE · Manufacturingransompayload reclama a Stücheli Architekten · CH · Professional Servicesransompayload reclama a Baya Technologies · Technologyransomkrybit reclama a www.kilpi-koskinen.fi · FI · Otherransomkrybit reclama a www.apsanet.com.ar · AR · Professional Servicesransomqilin reclama a Service Evaluation Concepts · US · Professional Servicesransomqilin reclama a tommer construction · US · Manufacturing
← All CVEs
CVE WatchAug 11, 2026

CVE-2026-66154

An insufficient certificate validation in a privileged communication workflow, was identified in a GMS application 9.5.1 (Build 9510.1044) a

CVSS

8.3

High

EPSS

KEV

Exploit Today

0-100

Published: Aug 11, 2026 · Last modified: Aug 11, 2026 · CWE-295

EPSS · 30d

Not enough EPSS history yet.

Technical description

An insufficient certificate validation in a privileged communication workflow, was identified in a GMS application 9.5.1 (Build 9510.1044) and earlier versions which, under a successful MitM attack and controlled network conditions, could permit unauthorized changes.

Official references
Related CVEs
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTitleMod.
CVE-2026-71290
Improper TLS hostname verification vulnerability in Apache HttpComponents Client 5.4 or newer. HostnameVerificationPolicy#BUILTIN setting has no effect when used with the async version of HttpClient. An attacker that can intercept and modify traffic between the client and the server can impersonate the server by presenting a valid certificate for a different domain.  Please note the classic version of HttpClient is not affected by this vulnerability.  Affected users are recommended to upgrade to at least version 5.6.4, which fixes the issue.5h
CVE-2026-484375.5 MED
CAI Content Credentials is affected by an Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized write access. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must visit a maliciously crafted URL or interact with a compromised web page.9h
CVE-2026-11814
A command injection vulnerability in the listed NETGEAR models allows a network-adjacent attacker with the ability to intercept and modify local network traffic (attacker-in-the-middle) to compromise the confidentiality and integrity of the affected device. This issue is limited to certain region-specific SKUs.10h
CVE-2026-181298.1 HIG
Cleartext transmission of sensitive information in the Core of Ivanti Endpoint Manager before version 2024 SU7 allows a remote unauthenticated attacker in a MITM position to leak credentials for external SQL connections.11h
CVE-2026-155547.4 HIG
0the Undertow AJP listener honours forged ssl_cert and is_ssl AJP attributes without requiring any shared-secret authentication. This enables an unauthenticated attacker with direct TCP access to port 8009 to bypass CLIENT-CERT authentication by injecting a forged X.509 certificate via the AJP protocol.5h
CVE-2026-667606.4 MED
0SAP Approuter does not correctly validate client certificates in certain callback flows. An attacker with low privileges, holding a certificate from the same trusted authority with matching subject values, could bypass the identity check. This complexity makes the attack difficult to execute. Successful exploitation could allow impersonation of a trusted internal component, resulting in a high impact on integrity and a low impact on confidentiality and availability.11h