PULSE
LIVE71signals / 24h
FEED
ransomblacknevas reclama a Portable Intelligence Inc www.portable-intelligence.com serviced by an IT company Computer... · US · Technologyransomsilentransomgroup reclama a Riker Danzig Scherer Hyland & Perretti · Professional Servicesransomkairos reclama a Hightech Signs · US · Manufacturingransomsilentransomgroup reclama a Riker Danzig LLP · US · Professional Servicesransomincransom reclama a gamaus.com · US · Technologyransomblacknevas reclama a Westbrook Greenhouse Systems www.westbrooksystems.com serviced by an IT company Computer C... · US · Agriculture and Food Productionransomblacknevas reclama a Enteroptyx Ophthalmology Products www.enteroptyx.com serviced by an IT company Computer Co... · US · Healthcareransomblacknevas reclama a Jack Rutherford Customs Brokers Ltd / The Rutherford Group www.therg.ca serviced by an IT ... · CA · Professional Servicesransomqilin reclama a United Association Local Union 345 · US · Otherransomincransom reclama a BEDC.COM.AU · AU · Energy & Utilitiesransomincransom reclama a diabetesandmetabolism.com · US · Healthcareransomclop reclama a AOL.COM · US · Technologyransomclop reclama a GATE7LLC.COMGBBEV.COM · GB · Not Foundransomclop reclama a ENTERATEK.MXESBERBEVERAGE.COM · MX · Agriculture and Food Productionransomblacknevas reclama a Portable Intelligence Inc www.portable-intelligence.com serviced by an IT company Computer... · US · Technologyransomsilentransomgroup reclama a Riker Danzig Scherer Hyland & Perretti · Professional Servicesransomkairos reclama a Hightech Signs · US · Manufacturingransomsilentransomgroup reclama a Riker Danzig LLP · US · Professional Servicesransomincransom reclama a gamaus.com · US · Technologyransomblacknevas reclama a Westbrook Greenhouse Systems www.westbrooksystems.com serviced by an IT company Computer C... · US · Agriculture and Food Productionransomblacknevas reclama a Enteroptyx Ophthalmology Products www.enteroptyx.com serviced by an IT company Computer Co... · US · Healthcareransomblacknevas reclama a Jack Rutherford Customs Brokers Ltd / The Rutherford Group www.therg.ca serviced by an IT ... · CA · Professional Servicesransomqilin reclama a United Association Local Union 345 · US · Otherransomincransom reclama a BEDC.COM.AU · AU · Energy & Utilitiesransomincransom reclama a diabetesandmetabolism.com · US · Healthcareransomclop reclama a AOL.COM · US · Technologyransomclop reclama a GATE7LLC.COMGBBEV.COM · GB · Not Foundransomclop reclama a ENTERATEK.MXESBERBEVERAGE.COM · MX · Agriculture and Food Production
← All CVEs
CVE WatchAug 12, 2026

CVE-2026-66340

The Mira cloud authentication endpoints do not enforce per-account rate limiting, per-IP throttling, or account lockout after repeated faile

CVSS

5.3

Medium

EPSS

KEV

Exploit Today

0

0-100

Published: Aug 11, 2026 · Last modified: Aug 12, 2026 · CWE-307

EPSS · 30d

Not enough EPSS history yet.

Technical description

The Mira cloud authentication endpoints do not enforce per-account rate limiting, per-IP throttling, or account lockout after repeated failed login attempts. An attacker can use brute-force methods to obtain gain access to user accounts.

Official references
Related CVEs
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTitleMod.
CVE-2026-659487.3 HIG
22.3%
7UnixAuth lacks brute-force protection in Apache Ranger versions <= 2.8.0.  Note:  UnixAuth is NOT a recommended option for production deployments.  Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.9.0, which fixes this issue.6h
CVE-2026-480847.4 HIG
28.9%
9OpenReception's appointment booking software provides an end-to-end encrypted appointment booking platform. Versions prior to 1.0.2 don't throttle failed passphrase login attempts. An attacker can submit unlimited wrong passphrase guesses against any known email address, capped only by the Argon2 verification cost (about 100 milliseconds per attempt on the tested host, giving 10 attempts per second sustained). The same backend implements a working per-account throttle on the WebAuthn challenge endpoint, which returns HTTP 429 after roughly 19 attempts. The passphrase branch simply does not invoke that throttle, leaving a supported high-value login path unprotected against credential stuffing and dictionary attacks. The asymmetry confirms this is an oversight rather than a design choice. The throttle infrastructure exists, is wired into the same auth backend, and works on the WebAuthn path. The passphrase branch in `/api/auth/login` was not updated to record failed attempts. Combined with the application's minimum-passphrase policy (12 characters, no entropy or dictionary checks), accounts using common base patterns such as `Spring2026!XX` or words from a leak corpus are realistically reachable in days on a single CPU, hours on a small GPU farm. Version 1.0.2 patches the issue.5d
CVE-2026-480715.8 MED
30.8%
9OpenReception's appointment booking software provides an end-to-end encrypted appointment booking platform. Prior to version 1.0.4, the PIN-type challenge throttle uses `emailHash` as the only key. The throttle rows live in the central `challenge_throttle` table, which is shared across all tenants. Every tenant's `/api/tenants/{id}/appointments/verify-challenge` endpoint increments the same row when a PIN response fails, and every tenant's `/api/tenants/{id}/appointments/challenge` endpoint reads the same row when deciding whether to issue a new challenge. When the same `emailHash` exists in multiple tenants on the same OpenReception instance (the same patient holding tunnels in two different clinics that share the platform), an attacker who knows the patient's email can lock out that patient on tenant B by issuing failed challenge responses against tenant A. The attacker needs no relationship to tenant B; the lockout propagates through the shared throttle row. The lockout escalates with repeated failures. The first lockout triggers at 4 failed attempts and lasts approximately 60 seconds. Subsequent failures escalate the lockout duration to 5 minutes, 30 minutes, and 60 minutes per the throttle service's escalation logic. Repeated bursts produce sustained denial of service against the targeted email. Version 1.0.4 patches the issue.5d
CVE-2026-166197.5 HIG
14.5%
4The miniOrange 2FA WordPress plugin before 6.2.8 does not correctly limit the number of second-factor verification attempts, tracking them against a client-supplied identifier that is reissued on every login, allowing an attacker who already knows a user's password to guess the one-time code without limit and take over the account.5d
CVE-2026-712139.1 CRI
24.8%
7Typemill's login endpoint (POST /tm/login, ControllerWebAuth::login) performs no rate-limiting, failed-attempt counting, or account lockout when captcha is disabled, which is the default configuration. An unauthenticated attacker can send unlimited password-guessing requests against any account, including administrators, with no throttling.3d
CVE-2026-712056.5 MED
5.6%
2changedetection.io's /login route checks the submitted password against a single PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA256 hash with no per-IP or per-session rate limiting, failed-attempt counter, or lockout (no rate-limiting library is present in requirements.txt).3d