PULSE
FEED
ransomshiba reclama a IT Foods Industries · Agriculture and Food Productionransomshiba reclama a Friendly Senior Living · Healthcareransomshiba reclama a Morgan White Group · Professional Servicesransomshiba reclama a Antwerp House Dentistry · GB · Healthcareransomeverstake reclama a as*****g.comransomeverstake reclama a ca*****s.comransomeverstake reclama a in*****s.comransomeverstake reclama a corp-smart.com · Technologyransomwhitearmor reclama a rolly.io · Technologyransomemperador reclama a LA PROFUMERIA SRL · IT · Retail & E-Commerceransomscarlettgroup reclama a sunnybrook.ca · CA · Healthcareransomscarlettgroup reclama a au.bank.in · IN · Financial Servicesransomqilin reclama a Udima · ES · Educationransomqilin reclama a W Interactive · GB · Technologyransomshiba reclama a IT Foods Industries · Agriculture and Food Productionransomshiba reclama a Friendly Senior Living · Healthcareransomshiba reclama a Morgan White Group · Professional Servicesransomshiba reclama a Antwerp House Dentistry · GB · Healthcareransomeverstake reclama a as*****g.comransomeverstake reclama a ca*****s.comransomeverstake reclama a in*****s.comransomeverstake reclama a corp-smart.com · Technologyransomwhitearmor reclama a rolly.io · Technologyransomemperador reclama a LA PROFUMERIA SRL · IT · Retail & E-Commerceransomscarlettgroup reclama a sunnybrook.ca · CA · Healthcareransomscarlettgroup reclama a au.bank.in · IN · Financial Servicesransomqilin reclama a Udima · ES · Educationransomqilin reclama a W Interactive · GB · Technology
← All CVEs
CVE WatchSep 25, 2026

CVE-2026-67276

RouterOS does not compare the complete RSA public key when matching an SSH authentication request to an authorized user key, checking the ke

CVSS

8.1

High

EPSS

8.9%

p95

KEV

—

Exploit Today

29

0-100

Published: Sep 5, 2026 · Last modified: Sep 25, 2026 · CWE-347

EPSS · 30d
6.5%EPSS · 30 days8.9%
2026-10-012026-10-28
Technical description

RouterOS does not compare the complete RSA public key when matching an SSH authentication request to an authorized user key, checking the key type and modulus but omitting the exponent. Because signature verification uses the client-supplied key, an attacker knowing an authorized RSA modulus can supply a key with exponent one, forge a valid signature, and open an SSH command channel as the target user without the private key.This issue affects only 7.x branch was fixed in versions: 7.23.4 (Long-term) and 7.24.2 (Stable)

Official references
Related CVEs
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTitleMod.
CVE-2026-1187743.7 LOW
—
———Forge (also called node-forge) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. Prior to 1.4.1, the affected implementation used certificate.verify(child), _verifySignature(), lib/x509.js to process the relevant input or security decision. node-forge selected RSA padding and RSASSA-PSS parameters from the issuer certificate rather than the child certificate being verified. A child labeled as RSASSA-PSS could therefore be accepted with a PKCS#1 v1.5 signature when the issuer used PKCS#1 v1.5. The signature still had to be produced with the trusted issuer's private key, so this did not permit certificate identity forgery, but it could bypass policies that require a declared signature scheme. This issue is fixed in version 1.4.1.7h
CVE-2026-118768—
—
———Botan is a C++ cryptography library. From 1.11.34 until 3.13.0, the botan ocsp_check command requested an OCSP response from a certificate's Authority Information Access URL without verifying the response signature or authorizing the signer. A malicious responder or on-path attacker could return a matching and timely GOOD response with an empty, invalid, or unauthorized signature, causing a revoked certificate to produce exit status 0 and OCSP check OK output. Only the command-line interface is affected. This issue is fixed in version 3.13.0.8h
CVE-2026-880784.3 MED
—
———Improper verification of cryptographic signature in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.10h
CVE-2026-339237.2 HIG
—
——0A signature verification vulnerability was discovered in the update installation functionality due to inconsistent validation of the update bundle contents. An attacker with administrative privileges can remotely supply a crafted update bundle that passes signature verification but runs an unsigned script when the bundle is installed. The script runs with root privileges, allowing the attacker to read or modify sensitive data, change the appliance configuration, or shut down the appliance.10h
CVE-2026-110985—
—
——0A Kafka broker using SASL/OAUTHBEARER with the default validator (sasl.oauthbearer.jwt.validator.class=DefaultJwtValidator) selects its implementation from configuration. When sasl.oauthbearer.jwks.endpoint.url is set, the validator verifies the JWT signature. When that URL is unset (the default) and no verification key resolver is supplied, DefaultJwtValidator silently falls back to ClientJwtValidator, which does not verify the JWT signature, algorithm, or issuer - and the broker starts with no warning or error. This is the residual of CVE-2026-33557, whose fix restored signature verification only on the path where the JWKS endpoint URL is set. Impact: A broker in this state accepts any structurally valid JWT, including "alg":"none" tokens. An unauthenticated remote attacker who can reach the listener can forge a token asserting any principal - including configured superusers - and gain full access to the cluster. Only brokers that enable SASL/OAUTHBEARER validation without a JWKS endpoint URL (and without a custom verification key resolver) are affected; brokers that set the URL verify signatures and are not affected. Unlike CVE-2026-110952 (issuer/audience not enforced by default), here no signature is verified at all. Mitigation (all affected versions, no upgrade required): Set sasl.oauthbearer.jwks.endpoint.url for every listener/mechanism that uses OAuthBearerValidatorCallbackHandler, or configure a signature-verifying sasl.oauthbearer.jwt.validator.class. Resolution: From Apache Kafka 4.2.2, 4.3.1, and 4.4.0: a broker that would fall back to the non-verifying ClientJwtValidator fails to start with a ConfigException instead of running without signature verification (secure by default).11h
CVE-2026-1180407.5 HIG
—
——0In Progress® Telerik® Document Processing Libraries prior to version 2026.3.1027, improper verification of cryptographic signatures and improper certificate validation in RadPdfProcessing digital signature validation allow an unauthenticated attacker to cause signature validation to report forged content as unmodified and its signing certificate as valid via a crafted signed PDF document.2d