CVE-2026-6899
Check for certificate revocation only considers the first matching CRL and ignores other valid CRLs of the same CA in the CycloneCrypto cryp
CVSS
5.6
Medium
EPSS
0.1%
p1
KEV
—
Exploit Today
0
0-100
Published: Jun 9, 2026 · Last modified: Jul 23, 2026 · CWE-299
0.1%EPSS · 30 days0.2%
2026-10-042026-10-31
Check for certificate revocation only considers the first matching CRL and ignores other valid CRLs of the same CA in the CycloneCrypto cryptographic wrapper of S2OPC library. It might allow connection between an OPC UA client and server using a revoked certificate.
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTitleMod.
CVE-2026-1186968.0 HIG19.8%
——6In JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA, PyCharm, PhpStorm, RubyMine and WebStorm before 2026.3, 2026.2.4, 2026.1.5.1, and 2025.3.6.2; GoLand before 2026.3, 2026.2.4, 2026.1.5.1, and 2025.3.5.2; Rider before 2026.3, 2026.2.4, 2026.1.5.3, and 2025.3.5.3; CLion before 2026.3, 2026.2.4.1, 2026.1.5.2, and 2025.3.6.3; DataGrip before 2026.3, 2026.2.6.1, 2026.1.4.1, and 2025.3.6.1; RustRover before 2026.3, 2026.2.5, 2026.1.4.1, and 2025.3.7.1; DataSpell before 2026.1.3.1 and 2025.3.3.1, the embedded browser trusted revoked intermediate certificates2dCVE-2026-115557—45.1%
——14Python has added a denylist for known compromised certificates to the "ssl" module to ensure user safety even without certificate revocation configured. Known compromised certificates will automatically be rejected regardless of the SSLContext policy configuration.6dCVE-2026-1155707.4 HIG31.7%
——10Electron is a framework for writing cross-platform desktop applications using JavaScript, HTML and CSS. Prior to 42.11.16, 43.8.1, 44.9.1, and 45.0.0-beta.6, Electron does not block compromised eMudhra intermediate certificates in Chromium networking, Node.js tls, Node.js https, or Node.js fetch. An attacker who holds a certificate issued through one of these intermediates and can intercept network traffic can impersonate a TLS server to an affected application. This issue is fixed in versions 42.11.16, 43.8.1, 44.9.1, and 45.0.0-beta.6.10dCVE-2026-1119436.8 MED33.8%
——10On most platforms, Go uses the given system root certificates. However, in some narrower cases, the system trust stores may not be updated without further action. To defend against the narrower set of cases that may remain affected, a denylist was added in crypto/x509 to return an error when calling Verify with any of the known intermediate certificates that are no longer considered to be trustworthy.3dCVE-2026-1022214.4 MED29.2%
——9No cwe for this issue in Windows Secure Boot allows an authorized attacker to bypass a security feature locally.7dCVE-2026-944175.3 MED6.1%
——2When an application enables both OCSP and CRL revocation checking on one WOLFSSL_CTX or certificate manager, wolfSSL skips the CRL check for any peer certificate that carries no Authority Information Access OCSP URL, and accepts a certificate the loaded CRL lists as revoked. The soft-fail policy for a missing responder collapses the OCSP result onto success before the code decides whether the CRL fallback is still needed, so "no responder exists" becomes indistinguishable from "the responder answered good". Affected builds define both HAVE_OCSP and HAVE_CRL: --enable-ocsp --enable-crl directly, and implicitly --enable-all, --enable-distro, --enable-curl, --enable-nginx, --enable-haproxy, --enable-stunnel, --enable-lighty, --enable-wpas, --enable-strongswan, --enable-mosquitto, --enable-jni, --enable-openvpn and --enable-krb. An application is affected only if it calls both wolfSSL_CTX_EnableOCSP() (or wolfSSL_EnableOCSP() / wolfSSL_CertManagerEnableOCSP()) and wolfSSL_CTX_EnableCRL() (or the equivalents) with a CRL loaded; an application that uses OCSP stapling alone through wolfSSL_CTX_EnableOCSPStapling() is not affected, because that sets up a separate OCSP instance. The defect sits in ProcessPeerCerts() and is reachable over TLS 1.0 through TLS 1.3 and DTLS, both on a client verifying a server certificate and on a server verifying a client certificate under mutual or post-handshake authentication. When the skipped check falls on a chain certificate rather than the leaf, the unchecked intermediate is promoted into the certificate manager and stays a trusted signer for every later connection on that context, so an affected long-running process needs its WOLFSSL_CTX torn down and not only its library replaced. All wolfSSL versions from 5.9.2 and earlier are affected; on versions 5.9.1 and 5.9.2 the WOLFSSL_OCSP_CHECKALL configuration fails closed with OCSP_NEED_URL, which leaves wolfSSL_CTX_EnableOCSP() without CHECKALL as the exposed configuration on 5.9.2.34d