CVE WatchAug 12, 2026

CVE-2026-73264

Prowler is a cloud security platform. Prior to 5.33.1, an authenticated user with Lighthouse provider configuration access could supply an u

CVSS

7.6

High

EPSS

—

KEV

—

Exploit Today

—

0-100

Published: Aug 12, 2026 · Last modified: Aug 12, 2026 · CWE-918

EPSS · 30d

Not enough EPSS history yet.

Technical description

Prowler is a cloud security platform. Prior to 5.33.1, an authenticated user with Lighthouse provider configuration access could supply an unvalidated base_url for the openai_compatible provider through POST /api/v1/lighthouse/providers and POST /api/v1/lighthouse/providers/{id}/connection, causing api/src/backend/tasks/jobs/lighthouse_providers.py to send outbound requests, including the API key in the Authorization header, to attacker-controlled or internal endpoints when client.models.list was called. This issue is fixed in version 5.33.1.

Official references

Related CVEs

CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTitleMod.

CVE-2026-73297—

—

———Microsoft UFO open-source framework for intelligent automation across devices and platforms. Prior to 3.0.8, _is_blocked_ip in ufo/utils/url_security.py did not block NAT64 prefixes 64:ff9b::/96 and 64:ff9b:1::/48, the 6to4 prefix 2002::/16, or the Teredo prefix 2001::/32 and did not re-check embedded IPv4 destinations, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker who can influence URLs processed by validate_url to bypass the SSRF guard and reach cloud metadata, internal services, or localhost. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.8.4h CVE-2026-659418.8 HIG

—

———In WhatsUp Gold versions released before 2026.0.2, an unauthenticated remote attacker with network access to the affected service can execute arbitrary code in the context of the IIS application service account.4h CVE-2026-73432—

—

———Vulnerability-Lookup contains a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the remote-instance synchronization functionality. Remote instance addresses were validated only for basic URL syntax before being stored, while the synchronization worker later dereferenced these addresses using requests.get() with automatic redirect handling and without enforcing network-boundary restrictions. An authenticated administrator with the admin:access permission could configure a remote instance whose address points to an internal, loopback, link-local, or cloud metadata HTTP(S) service. When synchronization is performed, the Vulnerability-Lookup server would issue the request from its own network context. An attacker could also use a publicly accessible URL that redirects to an internal destination, because redirects were previously followed without revalidating the destination. Successful exploitation could allow a privileged attacker to probe or interact with services that are accessible from the Vulnerability-Lookup server but not directly reachable by the attacker, including private network services or cloud instance metadata endpoints. The exact confidentiality, integrity, or availability impact depends on the services reachable from the application server. The patch introduces a shared outbound URL policy that restricts remote instances to HTTP(S), rejects non-public IP addresses, resolves hostnames at request time, and manually validates each redirect destination before following it. The implementation explicitly blocks private, loopback, link-local, multicast, reserved, and unspecified addresses.6h CVE-2026-492623.0 LOW

—

———In the Aimeos Pagible content management system prior to version 0.10.4, the administrative proxy route (`cmsproxy`) is vulnerable to a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) attack via DNS Rebinding. A Time-of-Check to Time-of-Use (TOCTOU) race condition exists between the URL validation phase and the actual HTTP request phase, allowing attackers to access internal network resources and cloud metadata endpoints. Version 0.10.4 fixes the issue.5h CVE-2026-704673.8 LOW

—

———A server-side request forgery (ssrf) vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSIEM 7.5.0, FortiSIEM 7.4.0 through 7.4.2, FortiSIEM 7.3.0 through 7.3.5, FortiSIEM 7.2 all versions, FortiSIEM 7.1 all versions, FortiSIEM 7.0 all versions, FortiSIEM 6.7 all versions, FortiSIEM 6.6 all versions, FortiSIEM 6.5 all versions may allow attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via <insert attack vector here>8h CVE-2026-190506.4 MED

—

——0The ProSolution WP Client WordPress plugin before 2.0.9 does not validate a user-supplied URL, and does not check the capability or nonce of the requester, before performing a server-side HTTP request with it, allowing any authenticated user, such as a subscriber, to make the site issue arbitrary requests to internal hosts and services, including requests with an attacker-chosen method, headers and body.8h