CVE-2026-7339
Heap buffer overflow in WebRTC in Google Chrome prior to 147.0.7727.138 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via
CVSS
8.8
High
EPSS
0.3%
p26
KEV
—
Exploit Today
8
0-100
Published: Apr 28, 2026 · Last modified: Jul 24, 2026 · CWE-122
0.3%EPSS · 30 days0.3%
2026-08-172026-09-14
Heap buffer overflow in WebRTC in Google Chrome prior to 147.0.7727.138 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTitleMod.
CVE-2026-904396.5 MED—
———NGINX Plus and NGINX Open Source have a vulnerability in the ngx_http_v3_module module. When using HTTP/3 with OpenSSL versions <= OpenSSL 3.5.0 under certain configurations, a limited heap buffer overflow could happen while processing a TLS handshake. This can happen in a non-deterministic manner that is beyond the attacker's control. This may cause a heap buffer overflow in the NGINX worker process leading to a restart and/or limited data corruption.
Impact:
This vulnerability may allow remote attackers to cause a denial-of-service (DoS) on the NGINX system or limited data corruption. There is no control plane exposure; this is a data plane issue only.
Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated.6hCVE-2026-399199.8 CRI—
———Ghostscript before 10.08.0 contains a heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability in the JPEG 2000 output adapter (base/sjpx_openjpeg.c) that allows attackers to cause memory corruption by supplying a crafted PDF containing a JPEG 2000 image with mismatched component subsampling factors. When image components declare different subsampling values, the non-samescale sub-byte-depth output path allocates a row buffer sized for packed output but writes a full byte per output column regardless of bit depth, overflowing the allocation and corrupting internal chunk-allocator metadata to achieve code execution.6hCVE-2026-910884.8 MED—
——0A vulnerability has been found in GPAC up to f1219cde. This issue affects the function gf_url_concatenate_ex of the file utils/url.c of the component URL Handler. The manipulation leads to heap-based buffer overflow. An attack has to be approached locally. Upgrading to version abi-16.23 is capable of addressing this issue. The identifier of the patch is afca1f1181668d85941d51ed1adf647807d5d975. It is advisable to upgrade the affected component.6hCVE-2026-910866.3 MED—
——0A security vulnerability has been detected in GPAC up to f1219cde. Affected by this issue is the function mpgviddmx_process of the file filters/reframe_mpgvid.c of the component MPEG Video Reframer. Such manipulation leads to heap-based buffer overflow. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. Upgrading to version abi-16.23 can resolve this issue. The name of the patch is afca1f1181668d85941d51ed1adf647807d5d975. Upgrading the affected component is recommended.6hCVE-2026-54559——
——0PocketSphinx is a small speech recognizer. Prior to 5.1.1, the trie language-model loaders in src/lm/ngram_model_trie.c do not adequately validate boundary conditions in ARPA, DMP, and binary format headers, and the acoustic-model loaders in src/mdef.c and src/util/bio.c use sscanf with unbounded string fields. Loading an invalid, corrupted, or malicious language or acoustic model can therefore cause stack or heap buffer overflows and memory corruption. An attacker who can write to a directory selected by POCKETSPHINX_PATH can replace or add a model file that PocketSphinx later loads; users of PocketSphinx 5prealpha have no backported patch and must migrate to the fixed release. This issue is fixed in version 5.1.1.1dCVE-2026-194997.7 HIG—
——0Calling strfmon and strfmon_l in the GNU C Library version 2.38 to 2.44 can write past the end of the caller-supplied output buffer when a conversion uses right-justified width padding.
Exploitation requires an application code path that calls strfmon or strfmon_l with right-justified width padding into a destination buffer that is large enough for the padding to succeed but too small for the internal memmove call. The field width or format may be attacker-influenced or a fixed susceptible pattern in the caller.
At the time of publication, no network-facing application impact is known.1d