PULSE
FEED
ransomwhitearmor reclama a Verification · Technologyransomulose reclama a zzq-testransomulose reclama a probe-011637cabbf94076-ransomdragonforce reclama a Zhito Technology · UA · Technologyransomsilentransomgroup reclama a Morrison Cohen · US · Professional Servicesransomemperador reclama a Afflelou · FR · Retail & E-Commerceransombyod reclama a University of New Mexico · US · Educationransomrhysida reclama a MISC Group · MY · Energy & Utilitiesransomn0n reclama a Ingelectus Innovative Electrical Solutions S.L. · ES · Energy & Utilitiesransomwhitearmor reclama a Gamdom · Otherransomfalcon reclama a Beasley Allen Law Firm · US · Professional Servicesransomqilin reclama a RaceTrakka · AU · Retail & E-Commerceransomqilin reclama a Smith Feddeler & Smith · US · Professional Servicesransomqilin reclama a Delta Electric Power Association · US · Energy & Utilitiesransomwhitearmor reclama a Verification · Technologyransomulose reclama a zzq-testransomulose reclama a probe-011637cabbf94076-ransomdragonforce reclama a Zhito Technology · UA · Technologyransomsilentransomgroup reclama a Morrison Cohen · US · Professional Servicesransomemperador reclama a Afflelou · FR · Retail & E-Commerceransombyod reclama a University of New Mexico · US · Educationransomrhysida reclama a MISC Group · MY · Energy & Utilitiesransomn0n reclama a Ingelectus Innovative Electrical Solutions S.L. · ES · Energy & Utilitiesransomwhitearmor reclama a Gamdom · Otherransomfalcon reclama a Beasley Allen Law Firm · US · Professional Servicesransomqilin reclama a RaceTrakka · AU · Retail & E-Commerceransomqilin reclama a Smith Feddeler & Smith · US · Professional Servicesransomqilin reclama a Delta Electric Power Association · US · Energy & Utilities
← All CVEs
CVE WatchOct 24, 2026

CVE-2026-8497

Improper certificate validation in the Devolutions Server connection handling in Devolutions Password Manager 2026.2.1.0 and earlier on Andr

CVSS

7.4

High

EPSS

0.1%

p3

KEV

—

Exploit Today

1

0-100

Published: Jul 29, 2026 · Last modified: Oct 24, 2026 · CWE-295

EPSS · 30d
0.1%EPSS · 30 days0.1%
2026-09-282026-10-25
Technical description

Improper certificate validation in the Devolutions Server connection handling in Devolutions Password Manager 2026.2.1.0 and earlier on Android, iOS, and macOS allows an adjacent-network attacker to intercept and modify sensitive information via a forged TLS certificate.

Official references
Related CVEs
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTitleMod.
CVE-2025-13833—
—
———A vulnerability exists in SecureConnector for Windows when the “Additional Appliance Connections” setting is enabled and the agent’s configuration file contains more than three trusted‑server entries. Some entries omit TLS certificate fingerprints, which allows the agent to accept and establish sessions with a malicious server. An attacker who controls the wired or wireless network can redirect traffic to a malicious server. The attacker can then use the agent’s built‑in command/file features to execute arbitrary commands as SYSTEM, granting full administrative control and the ability to disable endpoint protections or exfiltrate data.11h
CVE-2026-1159306.8 MED
—
———The MongoDB Shell (mongosh) relies on Node.js as a third-party runtime that carries its own TLS root certificate store. This certificate store has the recoverable eMudhra intermediate CA certificates. This issue impacts MongoDB Shell (mongosh) versions prior to 2.14.0 and can be resolved by updating to mongosh 2.14.0 which bundles Node.js 24.22.1 or later. If mongosh is installed through npm, it uses the Node.js runtime installed on the host; update that runtime separately.15h
CVE-2026-115693—
—
———Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability in hackney_ssl in benoitc hackney allows an on-path attacker to impersonate a server pinned to a private certificate authority via a certificate chain that ends in a publicly trusted root. hackney adds {partial_chain, fun hackney_ssl:partial_chain/1} to every verify_peer configuration. The callback returns any certificate in the peer chain whose public key matches a root in the bundled certifi store as the trust anchor, and OTP honours that callback over the configured cacerts. hackney_ssl:merge_ssl_opts/3 kept the callback when the caller replaced the trust store with cacerts or cacertfile in ssl_options, so a connection pinned to a private CA still accepted any chain that carried a publicly trusted root. The hostname check still applies, so the attacker needs a publicly trusted certificate for the pinned hostname. This issue affects hackney: from 1.24.0 before 4.9.0.15h
CVE-2026-1159963.7 LOW
13.9%
——4A vulnerability was detected in Unitree Robotics Unitree Go2 up to 1.1.13/1.1.14.1/1.1.15.1. This affects the function WebSocketClient.connect of the file websocket.py of the component chat_go. Performing a manipulation results in improper certificate validation. The attack may be initiated remotely. The attack's complexity is rated as high. The exploitability is reported as difficult. The vendor confirmed early: "These issues were previously submitted by the researcher through our Security Response Center platform and are tracked internally as follows: Submission 990504 corresponds to our internal ticket #616 (Go2 chat_go WSS client disabled TLS server certificate validation, CWE-295)."14h
CVE-2026-1159296.8 MED
8.3%
——2MongoDB Compass relies on Electron, a third-party runtime that carries its own TLS root certificate store. This root certificate store has the recoverable eMudhra intermediate CA certificates. Issue is resolved by updating to Compass 1.53.1, which includes Electron 44.9.1.15h
CVE-2026-1060726.7 MED
45.6%
——14A flaw in Node.js TLS hostname verification allows a certificate with only a DNS SAN to authenticate an IP endpoint when the client connects using a non-canonical IPv4 spelling, such as `0177.0.0.1`, `0x7f.0.0.1`, `2130706433` or `127.1`. `tls.checkServerIdentity()` did not classify these hosts as IP addresses, but normalized them to their canonical form and matched the result against the certificate DNS names. A certificate containing `DNS:127.0.0.1` and no `IP Address:127.0.0.1` SAN was therefore accepted, while the same certificate is correctly rejected for `127.0.0.1`. Exploitation requires a certificate with a numeric DNS SAN issued by a CA trusted by the client, and a platform resolver that accepts these spellings, such as glibc. This vulnerability affects Node.js **26.x**, **24.x**, and **22.x**.4d