PULSE
FEED
vulnKEV agrega CVE-2025-39964 — Linux / KernelvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-53266 — Linux / KernelvulnKEV agrega CVE-2025-39682 — Linux / KernelvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-58704 — Google / PixelvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-76460 — Cisco / Identity Services EnginevulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-87886 — Acronis / BackupvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-76461 — Cisco / Secure Email GatewayvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-84869 — ConnectWise / ScreenConnectvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-42016 — JFrog / ArtifactoryvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-42018 — JFrog / ArtifactoryvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-85706 — GitLab / Community Edition and Enterprise EditionvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-86060 — MikroTik / RouterOSvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-67277 — MikroTik / RouterOSvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-19490 — Citrix / NetScalervulnKEV agrega CVE-2025-39964 — Linux / KernelvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-53266 — Linux / KernelvulnKEV agrega CVE-2025-39682 — Linux / KernelvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-58704 — Google / PixelvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-76460 — Cisco / Identity Services EnginevulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-87886 — Acronis / BackupvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-76461 — Cisco / Secure Email GatewayvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-84869 — ConnectWise / ScreenConnectvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-42016 — JFrog / ArtifactoryvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-42018 — JFrog / ArtifactoryvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-85706 — GitLab / Community Edition and Enterprise EditionvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-86060 — MikroTik / RouterOSvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-67277 — MikroTik / RouterOSvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-19490 — Citrix / NetScaler
← All CVEs
CVE WatchSep 17, 2026

CVE-2026-85078

Sanic is an opensource python web server/framework. In version 25.12.0, Sanic's core HTTP/1.1 chunked-body handling does not fully consume t

CVSS

6.5

Medium

EPSS

0.3%

p23

KEV

Exploit Today

7

0-100

Published: Sep 17, 2026 · Last modified: Sep 17, 2026 · CWE-444

EPSS · 30d

Not enough EPSS history yet.

Technical description

Sanic is an opensource python web server/framework. In version 25.12.0, Sanic's core HTTP/1.1 chunked-body handling does not fully consume the trailer-part after the terminating zero chunk before reusing the keep-alive connection buffer. A remote unauthenticated client can place attacker-controlled bytes in that trailer region, causing Sanic to parse and route them as a hidden second request after the outer request. This breaks HTTP request-boundary integrity and can provide a request-smuggling primitive when Sanic is deployed behind intermediaries. This issue is fixed in version 25.12.1.

Official references
Related CVEs
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTitleMod.
CVE-2026-692178.7 HIG
41.7%
13Http4s is a Scala interface for HTTP services. Prior to 0.23.35 and 1.0.0-M47, Ember’s HTTP/1.1 parser accepts differing duplicate Content-Length headers and uses the last value instead of rejecting the message. When an Ember server is behind a keep-alive intermediary that selects a different occurrence, an unauthenticated attacker can create CL.CL request smuggling that bypasses front-end controls, captures a later user’s headers, or poisons a cache. The shared client parser can also misframe responses from a malicious or compromised upstream when the client acts as a proxy for multiple downstream consumers. This issue is fixed in versions 0.23.35 and 1.0.0-M47.2d
CVE-2026-692058.7 HIG
33.6%
10Http4s is a Scala interface for HTTP services. Prior to 0.23.35 and 1.0.0-M47, Ember’s HeaderP.parse uses a case-sensitive substring test for the Transfer-Encoding value and decodes header bytes with the platform default charset. Values such as Chunked are not recognized, values such as notchunked are incorrectly accepted, and Unicode case folding can turn a Kelvin-sign byte sequence into a match when UTF-8 is used. Intermediaries that apply RFC-compliant token and charset rules can therefore disagree with Ember’s Content-Length or zero-length framing, enabling TE.CL or TE.0 request smuggling, access-control bypass, cross-user request hijacking, and cache poisoning on the server path. Response smuggling through an ember-client gateway requires a malicious or compromised upstream. This issue is fixed in versions 0.23.35 and 1.0.0-M47.2d
CVE-2026-692165.4 MED
15.7%
5Http4s is a Scala interface for HTTP services. Prior to 0.23.35 and 1.0.0-M47, Ember’s chunk decoder trims the chunk-size token and accepts leading plus or minus signs instead of requiring one or more hexadecimal digits followed by the required CRLF. When an intermediary forwards chunked data without re-encoding and interprets malformed chunk boundaries differently, an unauthenticated attacker can create TE.TE request smuggling that bypasses intermediary controls, poisons caches, or hijacks the request queue. The same response-path leniency can enable response smuggling against an ember-client used as a gateway when the upstream is malicious or compromised. This issue is fixed in versions 0.23.35 and 1.0.0-M47.2d
CVE-2026-69204
26.4%
8Http4s is a Scala interface for HTTP services. Prior to 0.23.35 and 1.0.0-M47, Ember HTTP/1.1 does not reject messages containing both Transfer-Encoding and Content-Length, so an intermediary and Ember can select different body framing rules. When ember-server is behind a keep-alive intermediary that forwards both headers and frames by Content-Length, an unauthenticated attacker can smuggle a second request, bypass intermediary access controls, poison caches, or cause a victim request to be joined to an attacker-controlled prefix. The shared response parser can also desynchronize an ember-client connection when a malicious or compromised upstream sends both headers. This issue is fixed in versions 0.23.35 and 1.0.0-M47.2d
CVE-2024-140297.5 HIG
28.8%
9Tornado before 6.4.1 ignores duplicate Transfer-Encoding: chunked headers, treating requests as having no message body and parsing the chunked body as a subsequent request. Attackers can exploit this inconsistency when Tornado is deployed behind proxies to perform HTTP request smuggling, enabling access control bypass, cache poisoning, or connection desynchronization.2d
CVE-2023-543977.5 HIG
30.5%
9Tornado before 6.3.3 contains an HTTP request smuggling vulnerability due to improper parsing of Content-Length headers accepting non-standard characters. Attackers can send crafted HTTP requests with these characters to bypass proxy validation and smuggle requests when deployed behind certain proxies.1d