PULSE
FEED
ransomemperador reclama a AB InBev · BE · Agriculture and Food Productionransomwhitearmor reclama a Hisense · CN · Technologyransomanubis reclama a Newcomer Cremations, Funerals & Receptions · US · Healthcareransomqilin reclama a Castle Howard Estate · GB · Hospitalityransomlamashtu reclama a Vins Viallet · FR · Retail & E-Commerceransomemperador reclama a Phoenix S&S GmbH · DE · Manufacturingransomemperador reclama a Frommann Energie GmbH · DE · Energy & Utilitiesransomqilin reclama a SLTN Inter Access · NL · Not Foundransomkrybit reclama a www.choicegoodwill.com · US · Retail & E-Commerceransomkrybit reclama a mainplace.com.my · MY · Retail & E-Commerceransomkrybit reclama a MODON Developments S.A.E · EG · Manufacturingransomkrybit reclama a www.zhservices.com · Professional Servicesransomkrybit reclama a grupoeuro.com.mx · MX · Manufacturingransomkrybit reclama a www.optika.ca · CA · Technologyransomemperador reclama a AB InBev · BE · Agriculture and Food Productionransomwhitearmor reclama a Hisense · CN · Technologyransomanubis reclama a Newcomer Cremations, Funerals & Receptions · US · Healthcareransomqilin reclama a Castle Howard Estate · GB · Hospitalityransomlamashtu reclama a Vins Viallet · FR · Retail & E-Commerceransomemperador reclama a Phoenix S&S GmbH · DE · Manufacturingransomemperador reclama a Frommann Energie GmbH · DE · Energy & Utilitiesransomqilin reclama a SLTN Inter Access · NL · Not Foundransomkrybit reclama a www.choicegoodwill.com · US · Retail & E-Commerceransomkrybit reclama a mainplace.com.my · MY · Retail & E-Commerceransomkrybit reclama a MODON Developments S.A.E · EG · Manufacturingransomkrybit reclama a www.zhservices.com · Professional Servicesransomkrybit reclama a grupoeuro.com.mx · MX · Manufacturingransomkrybit reclama a www.optika.ca · CA · Technology
← All CVEs
CVE WatchSep 23, 2026

CVE-2026-85102

Check Point Multiple Products Improper Certificate Validation Vulnerability

CVSS

9.8

Critical

EPSS

54.2%

p99

KEV

YES

Sep 22, 2026

Exploit Today

80

0-100

Published: Sep 9, 2026 · Last modified: Sep 23, 2026 · CWE-295

EPSS · 30d
1.0%EPSS · 30 days54.2%
2026-09-262026-10-23
KEV catalog record

Product

Check Point / Multiple Products

Vulnerability

Check Point Multiple Products Improper Certificate Validation Vulnerability

Added to KEV

Sep 22, 2026

Remediate by

Sep 25, 2026

Known ransomware use

No

Summary description

Check Point Security Gateway and Check Point Spark Firewall using Site to Site VPN or Remote Access VPN contain an improper certificate validation vulnerability which could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to execute arbitrary code on the Gateway.

Required action

Apply mitigations in accordance with vendor instructions, ensuring compliance with CISA’s BOD 26-04 Prioritizing Security Updates Based on Risk (see URL in Notes) guidance and CISA’s “Forensics Triage Requirements” (see URL in Notes). Follow applicable BOD 26-04 guidance for cloud services or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable. Stakeholders are responsible for evaluating each asset's internet exposure and ensuring adherence to BOD 26-04 patching guidelines.

Notes

https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk1000117 ; ; BOD 26-04: https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/directives/bod-26-04-prioritizing-security-updates-based-risk ; Forensics Triage Requirements: https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/directives/bod-26-04-implementation-guidance-prioritizing-security-updates-based-risk ; https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-85102

Technical description

Improper certificate trust validation during VPN negotiation in Check Point Quantum Security Gateway may allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to execute arbitrary code on the Gateway.

Official references
Related CVEs
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTitleMod.
CVE-2026-1159963.7 LOW
—
———A vulnerability was detected in Unitree Robotics Unitree Go2 up to 1.1.13/1.1.14.1/1.1.15.1. This affects the function WebSocketClient.connect of the file websocket.py of the component chat_go. Performing a manipulation results in improper certificate validation. The attack may be initiated remotely. The attack's complexity is rated as high. The exploitability is reported as difficult. The vendor confirmed early: "These issues were previously submitted by the researcher through our Security Response Center platform and are tracked internally as follows: Submission 990504 corresponds to our internal ticket #616 (Go2 chat_go WSS client disabled TLS server certificate validation, CWE-295)."9h
CVE-2026-1159296.8 MED
—
——0MongoDB Compass relies on Electron, a third-party runtime that carries its own TLS root certificate store. This root certificate store has the recoverable eMudhra intermediate CA certificates. Issue is resolved by updating to Compass 1.53.1, which includes Electron 44.9.1.1d
CVE-2026-1060726.7 MED
—
——0A flaw in Node.js TLS hostname verification allows a certificate with only a DNS SAN to authenticate an IP endpoint when the client connects using a non-canonical IPv4 spelling, such as `0177.0.0.1`, `0x7f.0.0.1`, `2130706433` or `127.1`. `tls.checkServerIdentity()` did not classify these hosts as IP addresses, but normalized them to their canonical form and matched the result against the certificate DNS names. A certificate containing `DNS:127.0.0.1` and no `IP Address:127.0.0.1` SAN was therefore accepted, while the same certificate is correctly rejected for `127.0.0.1`. Exploitation requires a certificate with a numeric DNS SAN issued by a CA trusted by the client, and a platform resolver that accepts these spellings, such as glibc. This vulnerability affects Node.js **26.x**, **24.x**, and **22.x**.2d
CVE-2026-1060697.4 HIG
—
——0A flaw in Node.js TLS hostname verification can cause a server certificate to be validated against a different IP address than the one the client connected to, when the host is a non-canonical IPv4 literal with a leading zero, such as `0127.0.0.1`. `tls.checkServerIdentity()` normalizes the host following the WHATWG URL rules, which read a leading-zero octet as octal (`0127.0.0.1` becomes `87.0.0.1`), while the connection is made through the operating system resolver, which on some platforms such as macOS reads it as decimal (`127.0.0.1`). A server at the connected address can then be authenticated with a certificate issued for another IP address. This vulnerability affects Node.js **26.x**, **24.x**, and **22.x**.2d
CVE-2026-1054837.4 HIG
—
——0A flaw in Node.js TLS hostname verification allows a certificate without a matching IP address SAN to authenticate a connection to an IPv4 address when the host is written with non-ASCII characters, such as fullwidth digits (`127.0.0.1`). `tls.checkServerIdentity()` did not recognize such hosts as IP addresses, even though they normalize and resolve to a regular IPv4 address, and matched them against the certificate DNS names and Common Name instead. A certificate containing `DNS:127.0.0.1` or `DNS:*.0.0.1` could therefore be accepted for an IP endpoint it was not issued for. This is a regression introduced after the fix for CVE-2026-48618. This vulnerability affects Node.js **26.x** and **24.x**.2d
CVE-2026-107685—
—
——0Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability in the WebSocket streaming client in agentjido req_llm allows an on-path attacker to read and modify OpenAI WebSocket sessions, including the authorization bearer token, via a TLS certificate the client does not trust. ReqLLM.Streaming.WebSocketSession.Client.start/3 in lib/req_llm/streaming/web_socket_session/client.ex starts WebSockex without TLS options, and WebSockex defaults to insecure: true, which connects with verify: :verify_none. The option allowlist also drops any caller-supplied cacerts or ssl_options, so an application cannot turn verification on. The OpenAI Responses, Realtime, and Codex WebSocket paths reach this client and send the API key or OAuth access token in the authorization header. HTTP streaming through Finch and the HTTP/2 duplex session through Mint verify certificates and are not affected. This issue affects req_llm: from 1.9.0 before 1.29.0.2d