CVE-2026-92298
EspoCRM through 10.0.8 uses PHP's rand() function to generate tokens for lead-capture opt-in, event invitation, and campaign URLs instead of
CVSS
4.8
Medium
EPSS
0.3%
p26
KEV
—
Exploit Today
8
0-100
Published: Sep 16, 2026 · Last modified: Sep 16, 2026 · CWE-338
0.3%EPSS · 30 days0.3%
2026-09-162026-09-18
EspoCRM through 10.0.8 uses PHP's rand() function to generate tokens for lead-capture opt-in, event invitation, and campaign URLs instead of a cryptographically secure generator. Remote unauthenticated attackers can guess these roughly 31-bit tokens to confirm opt-ins, accept or decline event invitations on behalf of other contacts, and access event details.
- gist.github.comhttps://gist.github.com/kazisabu/9e3109aab24245fde19b88f53f965e93
- github.comhttps://github.com/espocrm/espocrm
- github.comhttps://github.com/espocrm/espocrm/blob/10.0.8/application/Espo/Core/Utils/Util.php#L585-L590
- github.comhttps://github.com/espocrm/espocrm/blob/10.0.8/application/Espo/Repositories/UniqueId.php#L47
- github.comhttps://github.com/espocrm/espocrm/commit/8e5555c1ee0ed1e92a9ad54e62f735ac2c4051a1
- www.vulncheck.comhttps://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/espocrm-through-10.0.8-weak-token-generation-via-rand
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTitleMod.
CVE-2026-938688.1 HIG—
———Cotonti through 1.0.0 derives password recovery validation tokens from md5(microtime()) in users.passrecover.php, creating a predictable token space of approximately one million values per second. Unauthenticated attackers can read the server Date header, precompute candidate tokens within a narrow time window, and probe them against the passrecover authentication endpoint to reset any account password including administrators.8hCVE-2026-927498.1 HIG43.2%
——13SafeLine through 9.4.1 derives the management console session-signing secret from a time-seeded math/rand generator, allowing attackers to reconstruct the key offline. Unauthenticated remote attackers who can bound the install timestamp can regenerate the secret and forge valid administrator session cookies to gain control of protected sites.2dCVE-2026-748873.7 LOW8.1%
——2openssl_encrypt before 1.4.0 imports Python's non-cryptographic 'random' module (Mersenne Twister PRNG) at line 15 of openssl_encrypt/modules/pqc.py. No direct calls to random.* were present in the code, so no cryptographic operation is currently affected; however, the import creates a hazard that future code could inadvertently use random.randint() instead of a cryptographically secure alternative (secrets/os.urandom), producing predictable values since the Mersenne Twister state can be recovered from approximately 624 outputs. Fixed by removing the import in 1.4.0.19dCVE-2026-748747.5 HIG17.4%
——5openssl_encrypt versions before 1.4.0 use Python's non-cryptographic random module for steganographic pixel selection in the generate_pseudorandom_sequence function. Attackers who know the password can recover the Mersenne Twister state from approximately 624 outputs and predict pixel locations containing hidden data for extraction.18dCVE-2026-735679.1 CRI25.4%
——8sm-crypto provides JavaScript implementations of the Chinese cryptographic algorithms SM2, SM3, and SM4. Prior to 0.5.0, the default no-argument sm2.generateKeyPairHex() path in Node.js uses the module-wide SecureRandom instance in src/sm2/utils.js, supplied by jsbn@1.1.0, which seeds an ARC4 stream from Math.random() and new Date().getTime() because window.crypto.getRandomValues is unavailable even though globalThis.crypto exists. An attacker who can observe the process's Math.random() outputs and estimate the key-generation time can reconstruct the seed, recover generated SM2 private keys, and predict signing ephemeral scalars used to forge signatures. This issue is fixed in version 0.5.0.10hCVE-2026-186117.5 HIG37.2%
——11A flaw was found in the Data Science Pipelines Operator. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to derive sensitive credentials, such as MariaDB root/user passwords and MinIO access/secret keys, if they can access the MinIO Route or MariaDB Service. The flaw occurs because the operator uses a cryptographically weak pseudo-random number generator (PRNG) to generate these credentials, making them predictable. Successful exploitation could lead to unauthorized access to all pipeline artifacts and metadata, resulting in significant information disclosure.10d