PULSE
FEED
ransombraincipher reclama a Mutares.com · DE · Manufacturingransomgenesis reclama a Xinos Construction · US · Manufacturingransomgenesis reclama a Insation Technologies · US · Technologyransomeclipse reclama a Comercial en Fletes México, S.A. de C.V. · MX · Transportationransomincransom reclama a https://www.sleep-clinic.ca/ · CA · Healthcareransomsilentransomgroup reclama a Tucker Ellis · US · Professional Servicesransomsilentransomgroup reclama a Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz · US · Professional Servicesransomsilentransomgroup reclama a B... law · Professional Servicesransomakira reclama a Ligne Roset · FR · Retail & E-Commerceransomakira reclama a Houston Machine and Thread · US · Manufacturingransomdirewolf reclama a Algonomy · US · Technologyransomobsoft reclama a Company #6ransomakira reclama a Hudson & Hudson SignProducts · US · Manufacturingransomshiba reclama a Istituto Borgo · IT · Otherransombraincipher reclama a Mutares.com · DE · Manufacturingransomgenesis reclama a Xinos Construction · US · Manufacturingransomgenesis reclama a Insation Technologies · US · Technologyransomeclipse reclama a Comercial en Fletes México, S.A. de C.V. · MX · Transportationransomincransom reclama a https://www.sleep-clinic.ca/ · CA · Healthcareransomsilentransomgroup reclama a Tucker Ellis · US · Professional Servicesransomsilentransomgroup reclama a Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz · US · Professional Servicesransomsilentransomgroup reclama a B... law · Professional Servicesransomakira reclama a Ligne Roset · FR · Retail & E-Commerceransomakira reclama a Houston Machine and Thread · US · Manufacturingransomdirewolf reclama a Algonomy · US · Technologyransomobsoft reclama a Company #6ransomakira reclama a Hudson & Hudson SignProducts · US · Manufacturingransomshiba reclama a Istituto Borgo · IT · Other
← All CVEs
CVE WatchSep 23, 2026

CVE-2026-93952

Arista VeloCloud Orchestrator Improper Input Validation Vulnerability

CVSS

10.0

Critical

EPSS

1.4%

p72

KEV

YES

Sep 22, 2026

Exploit Today

72

0-100

Published: Sep 22, 2026 · Last modified: Sep 23, 2026 · CWE-20

EPSS · 30d
1.1%EPSS · 30 days1.4%
2026-10-092026-11-06
KEV catalog record

Product

Arista / VeloCloud Orchestrator

Vulnerability

Arista VeloCloud Orchestrator Improper Input Validation Vulnerability

Added to KEV

Sep 22, 2026

Remediate by

Sep 25, 2026

Known ransomware use

No

Summary description

Arista VeloCloud Orchestrator (VCO) on-prem contains an improper input validation vulnerability that may allow a remote attacker to access privileged internal functionality and impact the VCO host. Successful exploitation may compromise the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the orchestrator and data managed by the orchestrator.

Required action

Apply mitigations in accordance with vendor instructions, ensuring compliance with CISA’s BOD 26-04 Prioritizing Security Updates Based on Risk (see URL in Notes) guidance and CISA’s “Forensics Triage Requirements” (see URL in Notes). Follow applicable BOD 26-04 guidance for cloud services or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable. Stakeholders are responsible for evaluating each asset's internet exposure and ensuring adherence to BOD 26-04 patching guidelines.

Notes

https://www.arista.com/en/support/advisories-notices/security-advisory/24765-security-advisory-0183 ; ; BOD 26-04: https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/directives/bod-26-04-prioritizing-security-updates-based-risk ; Forensics Triage Requirements: https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/directives/bod-26-04-implementation-guidance-prioritizing-security-updates-based-risk ; https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-93952

Technical description

VeloCloud Orchestrator (VCO) on-prem has a security issue where this issue may allow a remote attacker to access privileged internal functionality and impact the VCO host. Successful exploitation may compromise the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the orchestrator and data managed by the orchestrator. Hosted, including Dedicated, versions of VCO were impacted and have already been patched.

Official references
Related CVEs
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTitleMod.
CVE-2026-978486.5 MED
17.1%
——5A flaw was found in the token sanitization logic of Keycloak, an open source identity and access management solution. The issue occurs when a protocol mapper is configured to emit structured claims using the JSON type. The security check designed to remove unauthorized role mappings only looks for standard Java maps and fails to recognize Jackson based JSON objects. This allows an attacker to inject forged client roles into security tokens, which could lead to unauthorized access to protected resources.8h
CVE-2026-487059.3 CRI
43.6%
——13MONAI (Medical Open Network for AI) is an AI toolkit for health care imaging. Prior to 1.6.1, PydicomReader._get_affine() trusts non-finite values in the DICOM PixelSpacing, ImagePositionPatient, and ImageOrientationPatient fields and composes them into an affine matrix without validation. An unauthenticated attacker who can upload a crafted DICOM to a default MONAILabel deployment can propagate NaN or infinity values through LoadImaged, Spacingd, model inference, and output writing, causing inference failures, persistent datastore poisoning, or geometrically corrupted results. This issue is fixed in version 1.6.1.1d
CVE-2026-463509.1 CRI
48.6%
——15dcmjs is a JavaScript implementation of DICOM manipulation. Prior to 0.52.0, the DecimalString and IntegerString implementations in src/ValueRepresentation.js sanitize text with a permissive regular expression and pass the result to JavaScript's Number constructor without validating finiteness or the DICOM value-representation rules. Scientific notation overflow in a DS or IS field can produce positive or negative Infinity, while stripping alphabetic characters from signed infinity text can leave a sign-only string that converts to NaN. IntegerString also accepts exponent notation and values outside the DICOM signed 32-bit IS range. Applications that trust these parsed values can propagate invalid numbers into spatial geometry, display windowing, dose scaling, frame counts, rescaling, or volume reconstruction, causing incorrect calculations or disrupted processing. This issue is fixed in version 0.52.0.1d
CVE-2026-715488.8 HIG
21.0%
——6SuiteCRM is an open-source, enterprise-ready Customer Relationship Management (CRM) software application. Prior to 7.15.2 and 8.10.2, AOR_Report::build_report_query_where incorporates a report editor's parameter_value when value_type=Field without sufficient validation. An authenticated user who can save a report can use SQL injection to read the entire SuiteCRM database. Disclosed data can include users.user_hash, OAuth2 tokens, CRM records, report definitions, and configuration data; the connector does not permit stacked queries, so direct write-through-injection is not supported. This issue is fixed in versions 7.15.2 and 8.10.2.1d
CVE-2026-1164722.7 LOW
35.6%
——11A security issue was discovered in ingress-nginx where a user with permission to create an Ingress may be able to cause denial of service of the ingress-nginx data plane, or possibly redirect traffic from other Ingresses. Kubernetes clusters are only affected if they are using ingress-nginx. Due to a missing check, the mirror-target Ingress annotation can be used to target an unauthenticated configuration API within the ingress-nginx controller, allowing write commands to be submitted. Corrupting the data within that configuration API results in all traffic through ingress-nginx being dropped until an Ingress configuration change or a controller restart causes the data to be recreated correctly. In principle, this write access could also be used to redirect traffic from other Ingresses controlled by the same ingress-nginx instance. In practice, there is negligible additional risk: such redirection would require privileged information about internal ingress-nginx state, and users can already redirect traffic from other Ingresses controlled by the same ingress-nginx anyway.6h
CVE-2026-971746.8 MED
25.9%
——8A flaw was found in the Client-Initiated Backchannel Authentication (CIBA) implementation of Keycloak. The CIBA endpoint fails to properly validate the sub parameter, allowing it to be stored as an additional request parameter. During the token issuance process, this injected value overwrites the legitimate subject identifier. This allows an attacker to authenticate as themselves but receive security tokens belonging to a different victim user, leading to unauthorized account access.9h