PULSE
FEED
ransompear reclama a Adobe Insurance Brokers, LLC · US · Financial Servicesransomhyflock reclama a gabonmeca.com leak incident · GA · Manufacturingransomhyflock reclama a dangvuongcac · VN · Not Foundransomn0n reclama a Company #103 · PT · Not Foundransomn0n reclama a Company #102 · Not Foundransomn0n reclama a Company #101 · Not Foundransomn0n reclama a Company #100 · Not Foundransomn0n reclama a Company #99 · Not Foundransomn0n reclama a TheHomeMag NorCal · US · Retail & E-Commerceransomclop reclama a LEGAL-RECORDS.US · US · Professional Servicesransomscarlettgroup reclama a nbcuniversal.com · US · Technologyransomn0n reclama a Xylanpicks · US · Not Foundransombravox reclama a GSE-M Technology Sdn. Bhd. · MY · Technologyransomemperador reclama a Bruin Group LLC · US · Otherransompear reclama a Adobe Insurance Brokers, LLC · US · Financial Servicesransomhyflock reclama a gabonmeca.com leak incident · GA · Manufacturingransomhyflock reclama a dangvuongcac · VN · Not Foundransomn0n reclama a Company #103 · PT · Not Foundransomn0n reclama a Company #102 · Not Foundransomn0n reclama a Company #101 · Not Foundransomn0n reclama a Company #100 · Not Foundransomn0n reclama a Company #99 · Not Foundransomn0n reclama a TheHomeMag NorCal · US · Retail & E-Commerceransomclop reclama a LEGAL-RECORDS.US · US · Professional Servicesransomscarlettgroup reclama a nbcuniversal.com · US · Technologyransomn0n reclama a Xylanpicks · US · Not Foundransombravox reclama a GSE-M Technology Sdn. Bhd. · MY · Technologyransomemperador reclama a Bruin Group LLC · US · Other
← All CVEs
CVE WatchOct 19, 2026

CVE-2026-98550

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tipc: reject invalid and unexpected GRP_ACK_MSG to prevent bc_ackers un

CVSS

—

No CVSS

EPSS

0.2%

p11

KEV

—

Exploit Today

3

0-100

Published: Oct 18, 2026 · Last modified: Oct 19, 2026

EPSS · 30d
0.2%EPSS · 30 days0.2%
2026-10-192026-10-20
Technical description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tipc: reject invalid and unexpected GRP_ACK_MSG to prevent bc_ackers underflow Commit 48a5fe38772b ("tipc: fix bc_ackers underflow on duplicate GRP_ACK_MSG") rejected duplicate/stale ACKs in tipc_group_proto_rcv() by returning early when less_eq(acked, m->bc_acked). However, that check remains incomplete in two ways: 1. When grp->bc_ackers is zero (e.g. on a quiet group, when replicast ACKs were not requested, or after all expected members have already acknowledged), an unexpected GRP_ACK_MSG with acked > m->bc_acked passes less_eq() and unconditionally decrements grp->bc_ackers. Because bc_ackers is a u16, this wraps to 65535, causing tipc_group_bc_cong() to permanently report congestion and blocking all future group broadcasts on the socket. 2. During an active broadcast round (grp->bc_ackers > 0), the sender transmits packet S and advances grp->bc_snd_nxt to S + 1. Receivers increment their expected counter to S + 1 upon consuming packet S, so the only valid ACK value for the current round is strictly acked == grp->bc_snd_nxt. However, tipc_group_update_bc_members() initializes each member's m->bc_acked to prev = grp->bc_snd_nxt - 1 (S - 1 before increment). This leaves a 2-sequence gap (S - 1 to S + 1) in sequence space. An incoming ACK is therefore neither rejected as duplicate nor prevented from decrementing grp->bc_ackers if an unexpected or stale value (such as S) is received. A member sending acked = S followed by acked = S + 1 could decrement grp->bc_ackers twice in the same round, prematurely clearing bc_ackers or underflowing it. Fix this by: - Dropping GRP_ACK_MSG immediately if grp->bc_ackers is zero. - Requiring acked == grp->bc_snd_nxt and rejecting duplicates where m->bc_acked == acked. Because replicast broadcast rounds are strictly sequential, only grp->bc_snd_nxt can be acknowledged, and each member can acknowledge at most once per round. Note that a related pre-existing issue in tipc_group_delete_member() (where grp->bc_ackers decrementing to zero upon member departure does not restore *grp->open or trigger a socket wakeup) will be addressed in a separate patch.

Official references
Related CVEs

No related CVEs by CWE or product.