Vulnerabilities exploitable today
413,917in current view
Single score combining CVSS, KEV membership and EPSS. Every CVE with its own record — timeline from publication to active exploitation.
In KEV catalog1,779
New KEV · 24H0
Exploit Today ≥ 701,707
Distribution · last window
- Critical5,604
- High22,511
- Medium20,819
- Low2,138
Filters
Window
Severity
Flags
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTitleMod.
CVE-2026-1261697.2 HIG—
——0A improper neutralization of argument delimiters in a command ('argument injection') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiMail 8.0.0 through 8.0.2, FortiMail 7.6.0 through 7.6.6, FortiMail 7.4.0 through 7.4.8, FortiMail 7.2 all versions may allow an authenticated remote attacker with domain admin or admin privileges to delete users of other tenant domains on a paired FortiAuthenticator, execute arbitrary code as root or arbitrary CLI commands, and read or write arbitrary files as root via crafted HTTP requests to the administrative interface.9hCVE-2026-1261778.1 HIG—
——0A xml injection (aka blind xpath injection) vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAnalyzer 8.0.0, FortiAnalyzer 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiAnalyzer 7.4.0 through 7.4.11, FortiAnalyzer 7.2.0 through 7.2.12, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 8.0.0, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.4.1 through 7.4.11, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.2.1 through 7.2.12, FortiManager 8.0.0, FortiManager 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiManager 7.4.0 through 7.4.11, FortiManager 7.2.0 through 7.2.12, FortiManager Cloud 8.0.0, FortiManager Cloud 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiManager Cloud 7.4.1 through 7.4.11, FortiManager Cloud 7.2.1 through 7.2.12 may allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to inject arbitary content into a signed SAML response via crafted SAML requests.9hCVE-2026-1262117.2 HIG—
——0A improper privilege management vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAnalyzer 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiAnalyzer 7.6.1 through 7.6.7, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.6.1 through 7.6.8, FortiManager 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiManager 7.6.1 through 7.6.7, FortiManager Cloud 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiManager Cloud 7.6.1 through 7.6.8 may allow an authenticated privileged attacker to elevate their privileges via crafted JSON-RPC request.9hCVE-2026-1262147.2 HIG—
——0A authentication bypass by spoofing vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAnalyzer 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiAnalyzer 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiAnalyzer 7.4.0 through 7.4.11, FortiAnalyzer 7.2.0 through 7.2.12, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.4.1 through 7.4.11, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.2.1 through 7.2.12, FortiManager 8.0.0, FortiManager 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiManager 7.4.0 through 7.4.11, FortiManager 7.2.0 through 7.2.12 may allow an authenticated administrator to escalate their privileges, bypass authorization controls or impersonate internal services via specially crafted requests to the GUI.9hCVE-2026-1262217.2 HIG—
——0A improper neutralization of special elements in output used by a downstream component ('injection') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAnalyzer 8.0.0, FortiAnalyzer 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiAnalyzer 7.4.0 through 7.4.11, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 8.0.0, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.4.1 through 7.4.11, FortiManager 8.0.0, FortiManager 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiManager 7.4.0 through 7.4.11, FortiManager Cloud 8.0.0, FortiManager Cloud 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiManager Cloud 7.4.1 through 7.4.11 may allow an authenticated administrator to read or write arbitrary files or execute unauthorized code or commands via specially crafted requests to the GUI.9hCVE-2026-29033——
——0Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.28dCVE-2026-1262247.2 HIG—
——0A improper neutralization of argument delimiters in a command ('argument injection') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAnalyzer 8.0.0, FortiAnalyzer 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiAnalyzer 7.4.0 through 7.4.11, FortiAnalyzer 7.2.0 through 7.2.12, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 8.0.0, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.4.1 through 7.4.11, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.2.1 through 7.2.12, FortiManager 8.0.0, FortiManager 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiManager 7.4.0 through 7.4.11, FortiManager 7.2.0 through 7.2.12, FortiManager Cloud 8.0.0, FortiManager Cloud 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiManager Cloud 7.4.1 through 7.4.11, FortiManager Cloud 7.2.1 through 7.2.12 may allow an authenticated privileged admin user to execute unauthorized code or commands.9hCVE-2026-1262307.2 HIG—
——0A use of externally-controlled format string vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAnalyzer 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiAnalyzer 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiAnalyzer 7.4.0 through 7.4.11, FortiAnalyzer 7.2.0 through 7.2.12, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.4.1 through 7.4.11, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.2.1 through 7.2.12, FortiManager 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiManager 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiManager 7.4.0 through 7.4.11, FortiManager 7.2.0 through 7.2.12, FortiManager Cloud 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiManager Cloud 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiManager Cloud 7.4.1 through 7.4.11, FortiManager Cloud 7.2.1 through 7.2.12 may allow an authenticated administrator to execute unauthorized code or commands or cause a denial of service via specially crafted requests.9hCVE-2026-1262317.2 HIG—
——0A improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAnalyzer 8.0.0, FortiAnalyzer 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiAnalyzer 7.4.0 through 7.4.11, FortiAnalyzer 7.2 all versions, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.4.1 through 7.4.11, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.2 all versions, FortiManager 8.0.0, FortiManager 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiManager 7.4.0 through 7.4.11, FortiManager 7.2 all versions, FortiManager Cloud 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiManager Cloud 7.4.1 through 7.4.11, FortiManager Cloud 7.2 all versions may allow an authenticated attacker to execute unauthorized commands via a crafted HTTP request.9hCVE-2026-1262388.6 HIG—
——0A incorrect authorization vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAuthenticator 8.0.0 through 8.0.3, FortiAuthenticator 6.6.0 through 6.6.10 may allow an unauthenticated attacker to bypass authorization checks and gain unauthorized access to restricted functionality.9hCVE-2026-675438.8 HIG—
——0Heym builds and runs agentic systems and business-process automations on self-hosted infrastructure. Prior to version 0.0.70, heym hardens one untrusted-code path but not its sibling. The Python tool executor (python_tool_executor.py) treats user code as untrusted and mandates a Docker sandbox (no network, read-only fs, non-root, no docker socket), failing closed. The skill executor (skill_python_executor.py) runs skill Python via a local backend subprocess with no Docker isolation — only a 512 MB RLIMIT and a 7-key env denylist — so a skill executes inside the backend execution context, with filesystem access, network egress, and non-denylisted environment variables that should not be exposed to untrusted/shared skills. In the shipped Docker config (backend runs as root + /var/run/docker.sock mounted), this escalates to host root. This issue has been patched in version 0.0.70.1dCVE-2026-675448.8 HIG—
——0Heym builds and runs agentic systems and business-process automations on self-hosted infrastructure. Prior to version 0.0.71, Heym's workflow engine accepts an arbitrary Python code string in the playwrightCode field of a Playwright node. This string is written to a temporary .py file and executed directly by the backend process via subprocess.Popen([sys.executable, script_path]) with no sandboxing, AST validation, or role gate. Any authenticated user — including a freshly registered account — can achieve full remote code execution (RCE) on the backend host, running as the service process user (observed as root in the default Docker deployment). This issue has been patched in version 0.0.71.1dCVE-2026-675457.4 HIG—
——0Heym builds and runs agentic systems and business-process automations on self-hosted infrastructure. Prior to version 0.0.73, the HTTP workflow node in Heym makes outbound HTTP requests to user-supplied URLs without validation of the target host or IP address. If a workflow author has already configured an HTTP node that targets internal addresses such as cloud metadata endpoints or private network hosts, and exposed the workflow with anonymous execution, an unauthenticated attacker can trigger the preconfigured SSRF sink. The same project has comprehensive SSRF protection in its MCP integration, which is absent from the HTTP node. This issue has been patched in version 0.0.73.1dCVE-2026-1262427.4 HIG—
——0A incorrect authorization vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAuthenticator 8.0.0 through 8.0.3, FortiAuthenticator 6.6.0 through 6.6.10 may allow an attacker to bypass authentication and gain unauthorized access. Full impersonation however requires the attacker to obtain pre-required id and data via other means.9hCVE-2026-659717.6 HIG—
——0Livewire PowerGrid creates data tables based on Laravel Livewire library. From version 6.0.0 to before version 6.10.4, the public Livewire property sortDirection is interpolated verbatim into a raw SQL ORDER BY clause and is not restricted to asc/desc, allowing arbitrary SQL injection through POST /livewire/update. This issue has been patched in version 6.10.4.6hCVE-2026-1267584.4 MED—
——0A vulnerability was detected in Moonshot AI Kimi Code up to 2.0.2. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file .kimi-code/local.toml of the component WorkspaceDirsService. Performing a manipulation of the argument additional_dir results in reliance on untrusted inputs in a security decision. The attack requires a local approach. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 2.1.0 is able to resolve this issue. Upgrading the affected component is recommended.1dCVE-2026-1268483.1 LOW—
——0Uninitialized resource in Skia in Google Chrome prior to 157.0.8103.78 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to read memory outside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)9hCVE-2026-1268599.6 CRI—
——0Link following in FileSystem in Google Chrome prior to 157.0.8103.78 allowed a remote attacker leveraging social engineering to execute arbitrary code outside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)8hCVE-2026-1268618.8 HIG—
——0Use after free in Media in Google Chrome on on Android prior to 157.0.8103.78 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)8hCVE-2026-1268658.8 HIG—
——0Use after free in DOM in Google Chrome prior to 157.0.8103.78 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)11hCVE-2026-1268678.8 HIG—
——0Use after free in Browser in Google Chrome on on Windows prior to 157.0.8103.78 allowed a remote attacker to potentially execute arbitrary code outside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)11hCVE-2026-1268704.7 MED—
——0Uninitialized resource in ANGLE in Google Chrome prior to 157.0.8103.78 allowed a remote attacker to read memory outside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)10hCVE-2026-1268818.8 HIG—
——0Improper initialization in Media in Google Chrome prior to 157.0.8103.78 allowed a remote attacker to potentially execute arbitrary code outside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)8hCVE-2026-1268844.7 MED—
——0Out of bounds read in Skia in Google Chrome prior to 157.0.8103.78 allowed a remote attacker to read memory outside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)10hCVE-2026-1268888.8 HIG—
——0Buffer overflow in Turbolev in Google Chrome prior to 157.0.8103.78 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)11hCVE-2026-1268958.8 HIG—
——0Use after free in CSS in Google Chrome prior to 157.0.8103.78 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Critical)11hCVE-2026-1268984.3 MED—
——0Uninitialized resource in Skia in Google Chrome prior to 157.0.8103.78 allowed a remote attacker to obtain cross-origin data via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)10hCVE-2026-1269218.8 HIG—
——0Use after free in Accessibility in Google Chrome prior to 157.0.8103.78 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)11hCVE-2026-1269334.3 MED—
——0Zipline 4.0.0 before 4.8.0 contains an upload filter bypass vulnerability that allows users with upload access to store blocked file types due to extension format mismatch. The upload and partial handlers compare dotted, case-sensitive extensions against undotted disabledExtensions entries, letting authenticated or permitted unauthenticated folder uploaders bypass administrator restrictions.6hCVE-2026-1269353.7 LOW—
——0Zipline before 4.8.0 contains a race condition vulnerability in src/server/routes/raw/[id].ts that allows remote attackers to bypass file maxViews limits through non-atomic view counting. Attackers holding a file link can send parallel requests that read the same pre-increment count, viewing view-limited or delete-on-max-views files beyond their limit.6hCVE-2026-1267858.8 HIG—
——0A vulnerability has been found in rmalright TR-VISION HOME 2.0.5. Impacted is the function sub_11504 in the library WFanManager.sys of the component IOCTL Handler. Such manipulation leads to incorrect default permissions. The attack must be carried out locally. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.1dCVE-2026-1145567.4 HIG—
——0MailEnable Save Directory Traversal Arbitrary File Creation Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to create arbitrary files on affected installations of MailEnable. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability.
The specific flaw exists within the implementation of the Save method. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of a user-supplied path prior to using it in file operations. An attacker can leverage this in conjunction with other vulnerabilities to execute code in the context of SYSTEM. Was ZDI-CAN-29161.9hCVE-2000-5001——
——0Rejected reason: This CVE has the been REJECTED and will not be published by the CNA.1dCVE-2026-1060275.3 MED—
——0The Oxygen MyData for WooCommerce WordPress plugin before 3.0.9 does not have proper authorisation, nor validate the authenticity of the request, on one of its payment callbacks, allowing unauthenticated users to mark arbitrary WooCommerce orders as completed.9hCVE-2026-1109599.8 CRI—
——0The Descope WordPress plugin before 1.2.0 does not validate the authentication token it receives before creating a WordPress session, accepting any non-empty token, so an unauthenticated attacker can obtain a session for any existing account, including an administrator, by supplying that account's email address.9hCVE-2025-34787——
——0Rejected reason: This CVE ID was rejected because it was reserved but not used for a vulnerability disclosure.24dCVE-2026-918917.5 HIG—
——0Dell Terraform Provider for PowerStore, versions prior to 1.3.1 , contains a vulnerability that may cause sensitive authentication data to be insufficiently redacted in diagnostic logs. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to information exposure.9hCVE-2026-0324——
——0An incorrect privilege management vulnerability in the OPSWAT MetaDefender Endpoint Security SDK used by the Palo Alto Networks GlobalProtect™ app on Windows devices allows a locally authenticated non-administrative Windows user to escalate their privileges to NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM.9hCVE-2026-1220957.6 HIG—
——0AsiaInfo BSS Platform 9.2 before 9.2.38 has a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the menu icon upload function. An authenticated user with ordinary application privileges can upload an SVG file containing embedded JavaScript, which is served from the application origin. Normal menu rendering uses an HTML <img> element and does not execute the SVG script; exploitation requires a victim to load the uploaded SVG as a document (by directly navigating to its URL, or via <object>/<iframe>), in which case the script executes under the application origin.6hCVE-2026-0325——
——0An authorization bypass vulnerability in the GlobalProtect gateway of Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS® software enables an authenticated attacker with valid GlobalProtect credentials to bypass IP address restrictions and circumvent network access controls that rely on source IP filtering.
Cloud NGFW is not affected by this vulnerability.1d