Vulnerabilities exploitable today
401,106in current view
Single score combining CVSS, KEV membership and EPSS. Every CVE with its own record — timeline from publication to active exploitation.
In KEV catalog1,754
New KEV · 24H0
Exploit Today ≥ 701,665
Distribution · last window
- Critical3,441
- High15,704
- Medium14,721
- Low1,447
Filters
Window
Severity
Flags
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTitleMod.
CVE-2022-31470—99.0%
——30——CVE-2020-13382—99.0%
——30——CVE-2009-3958—99.0%
——30——CVE-2010-3585—99.0%
——30——CVE-2007-3898—99.0%
——30——CVE-2010-1157—99.0%
——30——CVE-2016-7434—99.0%
——30——CVE-2010-0248—99.0%
——30——CVE-1999-0502—99.0%
——30——CVE-2018-8021—99.0%
——30——CVE-2007-5348—99.0%
——30——CVE-2019-9760—99.0%
——30——CVE-1999-0191—99.0%
——30——CVE-2024-38023—99.0%
——30——CVE-2007-4620—99.0%
——30——CVE-2025-154678.8 HIG99.0%
——30Issue summary: Parsing CMS AuthEnvelopedData or EnvelopedData message with
maliciously crafted AEAD parameters can trigger a stack buffer overflow.
Impact summary: A stack buffer overflow may lead to a crash, causing Denial
of Service, or potentially remote code execution.
When parsing CMS (Auth)EnvelopedData structures that use AEAD ciphers such as
AES-GCM, the IV (Initialization Vector) encoded in the ASN.1 parameters is
copied into a fixed-size stack buffer without verifying that its length fits
the destination. An attacker can supply a crafted CMS message with an
oversized IV, causing a stack-based out-of-bounds write before any
authentication or tag verification occurs.
Applications and services that parse untrusted CMS or PKCS#7 content using
AEAD ciphers (e.g., S/MIME (Auth)EnvelopedData with AES-GCM) are vulnerable.
Because the overflow occurs prior to authentication, no valid key material
is required to trigger it. While exploitability to remote code execution
depends on platform and toolchain mitigations, the stack-based write
primitive represents a severe risk.
The FIPS modules in 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3 and 3.0 are not affected by this
issue, as the CMS implementation is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module
boundary.
OpenSSL 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3 and 3.0 are vulnerable to this issue.
OpenSSL 1.1.1 and 1.0.2 are not affected by this issue.7dCVE-2019-3964—99.0%
——30——CVE-2003-1041—99.0%
——30——CVE-2006-2502—99.0%
——30——CVE-2007-5099—99.0%
——30——CVE-2015-0925—99.0%
——30——CVE-2017-5174—99.0%
——30——CVE-2021-22160—99.0%
——30——CVE-2024-9061—99.0%
——30——CVE-2021-31213—99.0%
——30——CVE-2007-4921—99.0%
——30——CVE-2009-1955—99.0%
——30——CVE-2023-362558.8 HIG99.0%
——30An issue in Eramba Limited Eramba Enterprise and Community edition v.3.19.1 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the path parameter in the URL.105dCVE-2012-5192—99.0%
——30——CVE-2021-38147—99.0%
——30——CVE-2022-35919—99.0%
——30——CVE-2005-2847—99.0%
——30——CVE-2023-50231—99.0%
——30——CVE-2024-50498—99.0%
——30——CVE-2019-3963—99.0%
——30——CVE-2021-28640—99.0%
——30——CVE-2023-35924—99.0%
——30——CVE-2008-0108—99.0%
——30——CVE-2021-20081—99.0%
——30——CVE-2018-5006—99.0%
——30——