Vulnerabilities exploitable today
401,677in current view
Single score combining CVSS, KEV membership and EPSS. Every CVE with its own record — timeline from publication to active exploitation.
In KEV catalog1,754
New KEV · 24H0
Exploit Today ≥ 701,666
Distribution · last window
- Critical3,465
- High15,846
- Medium15,004
- Low1,477
Filters
Window
Severity
Flags
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTitleMod.
CVE-2008-4728—98.3%
——29——CVE-2006-5001—98.3%
——29——CVE-2025-117007.5 HIG98.3%
——29N-central versions < 2025.4 are vulnerable to multiple XML External Entities injection leading to information disclosure4dCVE-2003-0663—98.3%
——29——CVE-2018-7777—98.3%
——29——CVE-2007-1756—98.3%
——29——CVE-2016-3263—98.3%
——29——CVE-2021-46378—98.3%
——29——CVE-2009-3837—98.3%
——29——CVE-2024-44334—98.3%
——29——CVE-2008-3005—98.3%
——29——CVE-2009-4588—98.3%
——29——CVE-2020-4463—98.3%
——29——CVE-2023-388867.2 HIG98.3%
——29An issue in Dolibarr ERP CRM v.17.0.1 and before allows a remote privileged attacker to execute arbitrary code via a crafted command/script.106dCVE-2016-3211—98.3%
——29——CVE-2022-322054.3 MED98.3%
——29A malicious server can serve excessive amounts of `Set-Cookie:` headers in a HTTP response to curl and curl < 7.84.0 stores all of them. A sufficiently large amount of (big) cookies make subsequent HTTP requests to this, or other servers to which the cookies match, create requests that become larger than the threshold that curl uses internally to avoid sending crazy large requests (1048576 bytes) and instead returns an error.This denial state might remain for as long as the same cookies are kept, match and haven't expired. Due to cookie matching rules, a server on `foo.example.com` can set cookies that also would match for `bar.example.com`, making it it possible for a "sister server" to effectively cause a denial of service for a sibling site on the same second level domain using this method.8dCVE-2013-3482—98.3%
——29——CVE-2015-8413—98.3%
——29——CVE-2008-0110—98.3%
——29——CVE-2008-3473—98.3%
——29——CVE-2018-19571—98.3%
——29——CVE-2015-8411—98.3%
——29——CVE-2013-0007—98.3%
——29——CVE-2008-1088—98.3%
——29——CVE-2008-1085—98.3%
——29——CVE-2008-3007—98.3%
——29——CVE-2013-3662—98.3%
——29——CVE-2010-0250—98.3%
——29——CVE-2011-5170—98.3%
——29——CVE-2025-68926—98.3%
——29——CVE-2008-6898—98.3%
——29——CVE-2014-0591—98.3%
——29——CVE-2023-4528—98.3%
——29——CVE-2018-7836—98.3%
——29——CVE-2024-38148—98.3%
——29——CVE-2009-1029—98.3%
——29——CVE-2015-8048—98.3%
——29——CVE-2013-3120—98.3%
——29——CVE-2009-0081—98.3%
——29——CVE-2023-33735—98.3%
——29——