PULSE
FEED
ransomn0n reclama a Texcar Inc. · Manufacturingransomn0n reclama a GPIC Projectos Con Instalacoes Lda · PT · Manufacturingransomn0n reclama a Asisken Asistencia Médica S.A. · AR · Healthcareransomn0n reclama a Adirondack Networks, Inc. · US · Technologyransomn0n reclama a Arthritis Center of Riverside · US · Healthcareransomthegentlemen reclama a Red Oak Technologies · US · Technologyransomthegentlemen reclama a Penco Products · US · Manufacturingransomthegentlemen reclama a Conax Technologies · NO · Technologyransomqilin reclama a Commonwealth Community Bank · US · Financial Servicesransomdeadlock reclama a Trinity Custom Homes · US · Manufacturingransompanzer reclama a Family Planning Association of Pakistan · PK · Healthcareransomdeadlock reclama a Hensel Elektrik · DE · Manufacturingransomrhysida reclama a Sanders Law Group · Professional Servicesransomqilin reclama a Miljaus Producciones S.L (www.miljaus.com) · ES · Otherransomn0n reclama a Texcar Inc. · Manufacturingransomn0n reclama a GPIC Projectos Con Instalacoes Lda · PT · Manufacturingransomn0n reclama a Asisken Asistencia Médica S.A. · AR · Healthcareransomn0n reclama a Adirondack Networks, Inc. · US · Technologyransomn0n reclama a Arthritis Center of Riverside · US · Healthcareransomthegentlemen reclama a Red Oak Technologies · US · Technologyransomthegentlemen reclama a Penco Products · US · Manufacturingransomthegentlemen reclama a Conax Technologies · NO · Technologyransomqilin reclama a Commonwealth Community Bank · US · Financial Servicesransomdeadlock reclama a Trinity Custom Homes · US · Manufacturingransompanzer reclama a Family Planning Association of Pakistan · PK · Healthcareransomdeadlock reclama a Hensel Elektrik · DE · Manufacturingransomrhysida reclama a Sanders Law Group · Professional Servicesransomqilin reclama a Miljaus Producciones S.L (www.miljaus.com) · ES · Other
CVE Watch402,516 in full archive

Vulnerabilities exploitable today

402,516in current view

Single score combining CVSS, KEV membership and EPSS. Every CVE with its own record — timeline from publication to active exploitation.

In KEV catalog1,756
New KEV · 24H0
Exploit Today ≥ 701,669

Distribution · last window

  • Critical
    3,936
  • High
    16,940
  • Medium
    15,775
  • Low
    1,527
Filters
Filters

Window

Severity

Flags

Vulnerabilities11,201–11,240 · 402,516
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTitleMod.
CVE-2015-6114—
97.3%
——29——
CVE-2013-3116—
97.3%
——29——
CVE-2019-1221—
97.3%
——29——
CVE-2018-6006—
97.3%
——29——
CVE-2011-2382—
97.3%
——29——
CVE-2019-1359—
97.3%
——29——
CVE-2019-1280—
97.3%
——29——
CVE-2010-0246—
97.3%
——29——
CVE-2022-0811—
97.3%
——29——
CVE-2016-0053—
97.3%
——29——
CVE-2011-1992—
97.3%
——29——
CVE-2006-6059—
97.3%
——29——
CVE-2014-0263—
97.3%
——29——
CVE-2026-20945—
97.3%
——29——
CVE-2000-0081—
97.3%
——29——
CVE-2009-2433—
97.3%
——29——
CVE-2011-3833—
97.3%
——29——
CVE-2015-0061—
97.3%
——29——
CVE-2016-7273—
97.3%
——29——
CVE-2008-0456—
97.3%
——29——
CVE-2018-8576—
97.3%
——29——
CVE-2010-1980—
97.3%
——29——
CVE-2010-1260—
97.3%
——29——
CVE-2018-1028—
97.3%
——29——
CVE-2024-0088—
97.3%
——29——
CVE-2024-1676—
97.3%
——29——
CVE-2021-212955.9 MED
97.3%
——29Netty is an open-source, asynchronous event-driven network application framework for rapid development of maintainable high performance protocol servers & clients. In Netty (io.netty:netty-codec-http2) before version 4.1.60.Final there is a vulnerability that enables request smuggling. If a Content-Length header is present in the original HTTP/2 request, the field is not validated by `Http2MultiplexHandler` as it is propagated up. This is fine as long as the request is not proxied through as HTTP/1.1. If the request comes in as an HTTP/2 stream, gets converted into the HTTP/1.1 domain objects (`HttpRequest`, `HttpContent`, etc.) via `Http2StreamFrameToHttpObjectCodec `and then sent up to the child channel's pipeline and proxied through a remote peer as HTTP/1.1 this may result in request smuggling. In a proxy case, users may assume the content-length is validated somehow, which is not the case. If the request is forwarded to a backend channel that is a HTTP/1.1 connection, the Content-Length now has meaning and needs to be checked. An attacker can smuggle requests inside the body as it gets downgraded from HTTP/2 to HTTP/1.1. For an example attack refer to the linked GitHub Advisory. Users are only affected if all of this is true: `HTTP2MultiplexCodec` or `Http2FrameCodec` is used, `Http2StreamFrameToHttpObjectCodec` is used to convert to HTTP/1.1 objects, and these HTTP/1.1 objects are forwarded to another remote peer. This has been patched in 4.1.60.Final As a workaround, the user can do the validation by themselves by implementing a custom `ChannelInboundHandler` that is put in the `ChannelPipeline` behind `Http2StreamFrameToHttpObjectCodec`.16d
CVE-2024-21514—
97.3%
——29——
CVE-2000-0132—
97.3%
——29——
CVE-2018-8013—
97.3%
——29——
CVE-2024-6298—
97.3%
——29——
CVE-2022-41654—
97.3%
——29——
CVE-2016-3356—
97.3%
——29——
CVE-2020-9425—
97.3%
——29——
CVE-2018-6910—
97.3%
——29——
CVE-2011-0020—
97.3%
——29——
CVE-2003-0172—
97.3%
——29——
CVE-2006-0020—
97.3%
——29——
CVE-2016-0052—
97.3%
——29——
CVE-2006-0187—
97.3%
——29——