Vulnerabilities exploitable today
403,917in current view
Single score combining CVSS, KEV membership and EPSS. Every CVE with its own record — timeline from publication to active exploitation.
In KEV catalog1,758
New KEV · 24H0
Exploit Today ≥ 701,691
Distribution · last window
- Critical5,616
- High21,711
- Medium20,117
- Low2,110
Filters
Window
Severity
Flags
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTitleMod.
CVE-2004-0941—95.8%
——29——CVE-2001-0253—95.8%
——29——CVE-2014-1889—95.8%
——29——CVE-2026-274469.8 CRI95.8%
——29Missing Authentication for Critical Function (CWE-306) vulnerability in Apache Artemis, Apache ActiveMQ Artemis. An unauthenticated remote attacker can use the Core protocol to force a target broker to establish an outbound Core federation connection to an attacker-controlled rogue broker. This could potentially result in message injection into any queue and/or message exfiltration from any queue via the rogue broker. This impacts environments that allow both:
- incoming Core protocol connections from untrusted sources to the broker
- outgoing Core protocol connections from the broker to untrusted targets
This issue affects:
- Apache Artemis from 2.50.0 through 2.51.0
- Apache ActiveMQ Artemis from 2.11.0 through 2.44.0.
Users are recommended to upgrade to Apache Artemis version 2.52.0, which fixes the issue.
The issue can be mitigated by one of the following:
- Remove Core protocol support from any acceptor receiving connections from untrusted sources. Incoming Core protocol connections are supported by default via the "artemis" acceptor listening on port 61616. See the "protocols" URL parameter configured for the acceptor. An acceptor URL without this parameter supports all protocols by default, including Core.
- Use two-way SSL (i.e. certificate-based authentication) in order to force every client to present the proper SSL certificate when establishing a connection before any message protocol handshake is attempted. This will prevent unauthenticated exploitation of this vulnerability.
- Implement and deploy a Core interceptor to deny all Core downstream federation connect packets. Such packets have a type of (int) -16 or (byte) 0xfffffff0. Documentation for interceptors is available at https://artemis.apache.org/components/artemis/documentation/latest/intercepting-operations.html .39dCVE-2004-2442—95.8%
——29——CVE-2016-7867—95.8%
——29——CVE-2016-8749—95.8%
——29——CVE-2015-5418—95.8%
——29——CVE-2018-1000168—95.8%
——29——CVE-2024-45844—95.8%
——29——CVE-2018-193629.8 CRI95.8%
——29FasterXML jackson-databind 2.x before 2.9.8 might allow attackers to have unspecified impact by leveraging failure to block the jboss-common-core class from polymorphic deserialization.12dCVE-2025-53609—95.8%
——29——CVE-2000-1053—95.8%
——29——CVE-2008-5032—95.8%
——29——CVE-2021-355177.5 HIG95.8%
——29When reading a specially crafted TAR archive, Compress can be made to allocate large amounts of memory that finally leads to an out of memory error even for very small inputs. This could be used to mount a denial of service attack against services that use Compress' tar package.19dCVE-2020-8509—95.8%
——29——CVE-2009-3115—95.8%
——29——CVE-2018-4950—95.8%
——29——CVE-2006-4438—95.8%
——29——CVE-2002-0606—95.8%
——29——CVE-2018-5032—95.8%
——29——CVE-2018-1260—95.8%
——29——CVE-2010-5301—95.8%
——29——CVE-2015-4117—95.8%
——29——CVE-2020-0816—95.8%
——29——CVE-2015-5420—95.8%
——29——CVE-2015-3205—95.8%
——29——CVE-2020-0931—95.8%
——29——CVE-2003-0195—95.8%
——29——CVE-2015-4603—95.8%
——29——CVE-2004-1986—95.8%
——29——CVE-2018-193609.8 CRI95.8%
——29FasterXML jackson-databind 2.x before 2.9.8 might allow attackers to have unspecified impact by leveraging failure to block the axis2-transport-jms class from polymorphic deserialization.12dCVE-2025-02479.8 CRI95.8%
——29Memory safety bugs present in Firefox 133 and Thunderbird 133. Some of these bugs showed evidence of memory corruption and we presume that with enough effort some of these could have been exploited to run arbitrary code. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 134 and Thunderbird 134.22dCVE-2006-1990—95.8%
——29——CVE-2024-1538—95.8%
——29——CVE-2012-1180—95.8%
——29——CVE-2020-0929—95.8%
——29——CVE-2013-6618—95.8%
——29——CVE-2014-0683—95.8%
——29——CVE-2013-7204—95.8%
——29——