PULSE
LIVE18signals / 24h
FEED
ransomthegentlemen reclama a Military Sealift Command · US · Transportation/Logisticsransomthegentlemen reclama a Advantage Home Health Care · US · Healthcareransomthegentlemen reclama a Sunway Scientific · TW · Manufacturingransomqilin reclama a Cafar · AR · Agriculture and Food Productionransominterlock reclama a Centre for Newcomers · CA · Public Sectorransominterlock reclama a Paragon Store Fixtures · US · Manufacturingransomakira reclama a Westcoast Communication Services · Telecommunicationransomakira reclama a Nesco Bus Maintenance · Transportation/Logisticsransomm3rx reclama a suppcentersa.com · ZA · Business Servicesransomm3rx reclama a arambol.co.uk · GB · Not Foundransomincransom reclama a Kyokuto Kaihatsu Kogyo · JP · Manufacturingransomnova reclama a Phi · Not Foundransomnova reclama a Digipro · Technologyransomnova reclama a Integrated Marketing Services · Business Servicesransomthegentlemen reclama a Military Sealift Command · US · Transportation/Logisticsransomthegentlemen reclama a Advantage Home Health Care · US · Healthcareransomthegentlemen reclama a Sunway Scientific · TW · Manufacturingransomqilin reclama a Cafar · AR · Agriculture and Food Productionransominterlock reclama a Centre for Newcomers · CA · Public Sectorransominterlock reclama a Paragon Store Fixtures · US · Manufacturingransomakira reclama a Westcoast Communication Services · Telecommunicationransomakira reclama a Nesco Bus Maintenance · Transportation/Logisticsransomm3rx reclama a suppcentersa.com · ZA · Business Servicesransomm3rx reclama a arambol.co.uk · GB · Not Foundransomincransom reclama a Kyokuto Kaihatsu Kogyo · JP · Manufacturingransomnova reclama a Phi · Not Foundransomnova reclama a Digipro · Technologyransomnova reclama a Integrated Marketing Services · Business Services
CVE Watch349,427 in full archive

Vulnerabilities exploitable today

349,427in current view

Single score combining CVSS, KEV membership and EPSS. Every CVE with its own record — timeline from publication to active exploitation.

In KEV catalog1,647
New KEV · 24H0
Exploit Today ≥ 701,582

Distribution · last window

  • Critical
    1,327
  • High
    4,319
  • Medium
    3,685
  • Low
    289
Filters

Window

Severity

Flags

Vulnerabilities1,841–1,880 · 349,427
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTitleMod.
CVE-2020-14092
99.8%
30
CVE-2014-0515
99.8%
30
CVE-2024-21650
99.8%
30
CVE-2016-7552
99.8%
30
CVE-2022-3562
99.8%
30
CVE-2024-31309
99.8%
30
CVE-2021-2190
99.8%
30
CVE-2023-0992
99.8%
30
CVE-2012-1425
99.8%
30
CVE-2024-7120
99.8%
30
CVE-2013-2248
99.8%
30
CVE-2023-48795
99.8%
30
CVE-2016-4010
99.8%
30
CVE-2021-46422
99.8%
30
CVE-2010-3964
99.8%
30
CVE-2026-432848.8 HIG
99.8%
30In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: xfrm: esp: avoid in-place decrypt on shared skb frags MSG_SPLICE_PAGES can attach pages from a pipe directly to an skb. TCP marks such skbs with SKBFL_SHARED_FRAG after skb_splice_from_iter(), so later paths that may modify packet data can first make a private copy. The IPv4/IPv6 datagram append paths did not set this flag when splicing pages into UDP skbs. That leaves an ESP-in-UDP packet made from shared pipe pages looking like an ordinary uncloned nonlinear skb. ESP input then takes the no-COW fast path for uncloned skbs without a frag_list and decrypts in place over data that is not owned privately by the skb. Mark IPv4/IPv6 datagram splice frags with SKBFL_SHARED_FRAG, matching TCP. Also make ESP input fall back to skb_cow_data() when the flag is present, so ESP does not decrypt externally backed frags in place. Private nonlinear skb frags still use the existing fast path. This intentionally does not change ESP output. In esp_output_head(), the path that appends the ESP trailer to existing skb tailroom without calling skb_cow_data() is not reachable for nonlinear skbs: skb_tailroom() returns zero when skb->data_len is nonzero, while ESP tailen is positive. Thus ESP output will either use the separate destination-frag path or fall back to skb_cow_data().3d
CVE-2024-45507
99.8%
30
CVE-2018-3245
99.8%
30
CVE-2022-29535
99.8%
30
CVE-2013-1965
99.8%
30
CVE-2015-5371
99.8%
30
CVE-2021-31474
99.8%
30
CVE-2012-1460
99.8%
30
CVE-2019-7276
99.8%
30
CVE-2021-20080
99.8%
30
CVE-2020-24186
99.8%
30
CVE-2019-10173
99.8%
30
CVE-2018-11784
99.8%
30
CVE-2023-44443
99.8%
30
CVE-2024-27956
99.8%
30
CVE-2016-3081
99.8%
30
CVE-2022-4067
99.8%
30
CVE-2021-27850
99.8%
30
CVE-2023-30258
99.8%
30
CVE-2002-0840
99.8%
30
CVE-2024-22024
99.8%
30
CVE-2005-1983
99.8%
30
CVE-2023-24941
99.8%
30
CVE-2020-17506
99.8%
30
CVE-2010-0425
99.8%
30