PULSEUnderground Intel

LIVE57signals / 24h

FEED

ransomgammax reclama a MTCO (Mahmoud Altaheni & Partners Trading Co) · SA · Otherransomgammax reclama a MTCO (Mahmoud Altaheni & Partners Trading Company) · SA · Professional Servicesransomcoinbasecartel reclama a CEN and Cenelec · BE · Otherransomcoinbasecartel reclama a MIM Fertility · GB · Healthcareransomcoinbasecartel reclama a M. B. Kahn Construction Co. · US · Manufacturingransomcoinbasecartel reclama a Xs Cad · Technologyransomcrpxo reclama a KUVEYT TURK · TR · Financial Servicesransomcrpxo reclama a FINANSBANK · TR · Financial Servicesransomcrpxo reclama a ANADOLUBANK · TR · Financial Servicesransomcrpxo reclama a THY · TR · Transportationransomcrpxo reclama a JOHNSON & JOHNSON · US · Healthcareransomcrpxo reclama a DOĞAN HOLDİNG · TR · Otherransomcrpxo reclama a ANADOLU SİGORTA · TR · Financial Servicesransomcrpxo reclama a HYUNDAI · KR · Manufacturingransomgammax reclama a MTCO (Mahmoud Altaheni & Partners Trading Co) · SA · Otherransomgammax reclama a MTCO (Mahmoud Altaheni & Partners Trading Company) · SA · Professional Servicesransomcoinbasecartel reclama a CEN and Cenelec · BE · Otherransomcoinbasecartel reclama a MIM Fertility · GB · Healthcareransomcoinbasecartel reclama a M. B. Kahn Construction Co. · US · Manufacturingransomcoinbasecartel reclama a Xs Cad · Technologyransomcrpxo reclama a KUVEYT TURK · TR · Financial Servicesransomcrpxo reclama a FINANSBANK · TR · Financial Servicesransomcrpxo reclama a ANADOLUBANK · TR · Financial Servicesransomcrpxo reclama a THY · TR · Transportationransomcrpxo reclama a JOHNSON & JOHNSON · US · Healthcareransomcrpxo reclama a DOĞAN HOLDİNG · TR · Otherransomcrpxo reclama a ANADOLU SİGORTA · TR · Financial Servicesransomcrpxo reclama a HYUNDAI · KR · Manufacturing

CVE Watch354,689 in full archive

Vulnerabilities exploitable today

354,689in current view

Single score combining CVSS, KEV membership and EPSS. Every CVE with its own record — timeline from publication to active exploitation.

In KEV catalog1,656

New KEV · 24H0

Exploit Today ≥ 701,601

Distribution · last window

Critical
2,617
High
9,374
Medium
7,592
Low
711

Filters

Window

Severity

Flags

Vulnerabilities19,121–19,160 · 354,689

CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTitleMod.

CVE-2007-5004—

——28——CVE-2007-0445—

——28——CVE-2005-2885—

——28——CVE-2018-12023—

——28——CVE-2008-5356—

——28——CVE-2019-1092—

——28——CVE-2013-6830—

——28——CVE-2013-3541—

——28——CVE-2001-0899—

——28——CVE-2019-3402—

——28——CVE-2017-15644—

——28——CVE-2009-4355—

——28——CVE-2016-9636—

——28——CVE-2016-2516—

——28——CVE-2008-3293—

——28——CVE-2026-335267.5 HIG

——28Squid is a caching proxy for the Web. Prior to version 7.5, due to heap Use-After-Free, Squid is vulnerable to Denial of Service when handling ICP traffic. This problem allows a remote attacker to perform a reliable and repeatable Denial of Service attack against the Squid service using ICP protocol. This attack is limited to Squid deployments that explicitly enable ICP support (i.e. configure non-zero `icp_port`). This problem _cannot_ be mitigated by denying ICP queries using `icp_access` rules. Version 7.5 contains a patch.17d CVE-2020-28967—

——28——CVE-2025-4918—

——28——CVE-2011-2767—

——28——CVE-2020-10257—

——28——CVE-2004-2280—

——28——CVE-2011-4531—

——28——CVE-2019-1062—

——28——CVE-2009-0846—

——28——CVE-2024-7580—

——28——CVE-2000-0017—

——28——CVE-2017-6341—

——28——CVE-2007-5245—

——28——CVE-2021-41382—

——28——CVE-2008-4324—

——28——CVE-2005-3656—

——28——CVE-2018-1038—

——28——CVE-2024-12342—

——28——CVE-2018-1327—

——28——CVE-2017-8598—

——28——CVE-2017-8672—

——28——CVE-2017-8674—

——28——CVE-2006-2555—

——28——CVE-2019-17569—

——28——CVE-2007-4338—