Vulnerabilities exploitable today
401,106in current view
Single score combining CVSS, KEV membership and EPSS. Every CVE with its own record — timeline from publication to active exploitation.
In KEV catalog1,754
New KEV · 24H0
Exploit Today ≥ 701,665
Distribution · last window
- Critical3,501
- High15,930
- Medium14,893
- Low1,472
Filters
Window
Severity
Flags
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTitleMod.
CVE-2016-0492—99.8%
——30——CVE-2012-1429—99.8%
——30——CVE-2016-7547—99.8%
——30——CVE-2019-15976—99.8%
——30——CVE-2012-1425—99.8%
——30——CVE-2024-0692—99.8%
——30——CVE-2022-40022—99.8%
——30——CVE-2001-0414—99.8%
——30——CVE-2023-28302—99.8%
——30——CVE-2018-6892—99.8%
——30——CVE-2021-37539—99.8%
——30——CVE-2025-34037—99.8%
——30An OS command injection vulnerability exists in various models of E-Series Linksys routers via the /tmUnblock.cgi and /hndUnblock.cgi endpoints over HTTP on port 8080. The CGI scripts improperly process user-supplied input passed to the ttcp_ip parameter without sanitization, allowing unauthenticated attackers to inject shell commands. This vulnerability was reported to be exploited in the wild by the "TheMoon" worm in 2014 to deploy a MIPS ELF payload, enabling arbitrary code execution on the router. Additionally, this vulnerability may affect other Linksys products to include, but not limited to, WAG/WAP/WES/WET/WRT-series router models and Wireless-N access points and routers. Exploitation evidence was observed by the Shadowserver Foundation on 2025-02-06 UTC.91dCVE-2021-46065—99.8%
——30——CVE-2015-0359—99.8%
——30——CVE-2021-27905—99.8%
——30——CVE-2022-1329—99.8%
——30——CVE-2009-3103—99.8%
——30——CVE-2019-8943—99.8%
——30——CVE-2024-9047—99.8%
——30——CVE-2024-7120—99.8%
——30——CVE-2023-0992—99.8%
——30——CVE-2006-2369—99.8%
——30——CVE-2023-487955.9 MED99.8%
——30The SSH transport protocol with certain OpenSSH extensions, found in OpenSSH before 9.6 and other products, allows remote attackers to bypass integrity checks such that some packets are omitted (from the extension negotiation message), and a client and server may consequently end up with a connection for which some security features have been downgraded or disabled, aka a Terrapin attack. This occurs because the SSH Binary Packet Protocol (BPP), implemented by these extensions, mishandles the handshake phase and mishandles use of sequence numbers. For example, there is an effective attack against SSH's use of ChaCha20-Poly1305 (and CBC with Encrypt-then-MAC). The bypass occurs in chacha20-poly1305@openssh.com and (if CBC is used) the -etm@openssh.com MAC algorithms. This also affects Maverick Synergy Java SSH API before 3.1.0-SNAPSHOT, Dropbear through 2022.83, Ssh before 5.1.1 in Erlang/OTP, PuTTY before 0.80, AsyncSSH before 2.14.2, golang.org/x/crypto before 0.17.0, libssh before 0.10.6, libssh2 through 1.11.0, Thorn Tech SFTP Gateway before 3.4.6, Tera Term before 5.1, Paramiko before 3.4.0, jsch before 0.2.15, SFTPGo before 2.5.6, Netgate pfSense Plus through 23.09.1, Netgate pfSense CE through 2.7.2, HPN-SSH through 18.2.0, ProFTPD before 1.3.8b (and before 1.3.9rc2), ORYX CycloneSSH before 2.3.4, NetSarang XShell 7 before Build 0144, CrushFTP before 10.6.0, ConnectBot SSH library before 2.2.22, Apache MINA sshd through 2.11.0, sshj through 0.37.0, TinySSH through 20230101, trilead-ssh2 6401, LANCOM LCOS and LANconfig, FileZilla before 3.66.4, Nova before 11.8, PKIX-SSH before 14.4, SecureCRT before 9.4.3, Transmit5 before 5.10.4, Win32-OpenSSH before 9.5.0.0p1-Beta, WinSCP before 6.2.2, Bitvise SSH Server before 9.32, Bitvise SSH Client before 9.33, KiTTY through 0.76.1.13, the net-ssh gem 7.2.0 for Ruby, the mscdex ssh2 module before 1.15.0 for Node.js, the thrussh library before 0.35.1 for Rust, and the Russh crate before 0.40.2 for Rust.6dCVE-2018-16509—99.8%
——30——CVE-2024-8856—99.8%
——30——CVE-2024-2389—99.8%
——30——CVE-2016-1524—99.8%
——30——CVE-2023-0050—99.8%
——30——CVE-2017-14492—99.8%
——30——CVE-2023-44443—99.8%
——30——CVE-2020-2096—99.8%
——30——CVE-2022-29535—99.8%
——30——CVE-2013-1965—99.8%
——30——CVE-2017-7615—99.8%
——30——CVE-2009-0545—99.8%
——30——CVE-2012-1461—99.8%
——30——CVE-2023-2947—99.8%
——30——CVE-2023-37582—99.8%
——30——CVE-2016-3510—99.8%
——30——CVE-2018-15708—99.8%
——30——