PULSE
FEED
ransomlockbit5 reclama a synergy.co.id · IDransomshiba reclama a Tema Hwt · DEransomqilin reclama a fzmb GmbH, Forschungszentrum für Medizintechnik und Biotechnologie · DE · Healthcareransomqilin reclama a Global Holding · Otherransomwhitearmor reclama a AmplifAI (GoDaddy instance) · US · Technologyransomdirewolf reclama a My Cloud Grocer · GB · Retail & E-Commerceransomhyflock reclama a hitech group · US · Technologyransomqilin reclama a Shibata Co., Ltd. · JP · Manufacturingransomqilin reclama a Meshbesher & Spence · US · Professional Servicesransomqilin reclama a BKV Vasúti Jármjavító Kft · HU · Transportationransomqilin reclama a Forum · AT · Professional Servicesransomqilin reclama a Select Community Management · US · Professional Servicesransomqilin reclama a CMD Naturkosmetik · DE · Retail & E-Commerceransomqilin reclama a qc-consult · DE · Professional Servicesransomlockbit5 reclama a synergy.co.id · IDransomshiba reclama a Tema Hwt · DEransomqilin reclama a fzmb GmbH, Forschungszentrum für Medizintechnik und Biotechnologie · DE · Healthcareransomqilin reclama a Global Holding · Otherransomwhitearmor reclama a AmplifAI (GoDaddy instance) · US · Technologyransomdirewolf reclama a My Cloud Grocer · GB · Retail & E-Commerceransomhyflock reclama a hitech group · US · Technologyransomqilin reclama a Shibata Co., Ltd. · JP · Manufacturingransomqilin reclama a Meshbesher & Spence · US · Professional Servicesransomqilin reclama a BKV Vasúti Jármjavító Kft · HU · Transportationransomqilin reclama a Forum · AT · Professional Servicesransomqilin reclama a Select Community Management · US · Professional Servicesransomqilin reclama a CMD Naturkosmetik · DE · Retail & E-Commerceransomqilin reclama a qc-consult · DE · Professional Services
CVE Watch406,313 in full archive

Vulnerabilities exploitable today

406,313in current view

Single score combining CVSS, KEV membership and EPSS. Every CVE with its own record — timeline from publication to active exploitation.

In KEV catalog1,766
New KEV · 24H0
Exploit Today ≥ 701,698

Distribution · last window

  • Critical
    5,563
  • High
    21,577
  • Medium
    20,086
  • Low
    2,090
Filters
Filters

Window

Severity

Flags

Vulnerabilities24,641–24,680 · 406,313
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTitleMod.
CVE-2021-229459.1 CRI
93.9%
——28When sending data to an MQTT server, libcurl <= 7.73.0 and 7.78.0 could in some circumstances erroneously keep a pointer to an already freed memory area and both use that again in a subsequent call to send data and also free it *again*.18d
CVE-2009-1711—
93.9%
——28——
CVE-2002-1147—
93.9%
——28——
CVE-2018-8941—
93.9%
——28——
CVE-2009-4535—
93.9%
——28——
CVE-2000-0825—
93.9%
——28——
CVE-2010-2006—
93.9%
——28——
CVE-2007-3954—
93.9%
——28——
CVE-2006-6445—
93.9%
——28——
CVE-2006-0700—
93.9%
——28——
CVE-2017-8531—
93.9%
——28——
CVE-2021-35578—
93.9%
——28——
CVE-2016-6432—
93.9%
——28——
CVE-2019-0982—
93.9%
——28——
CVE-2024-4504—
93.9%
——28——
CVE-2018-71677.5 HIG
93.9%
——28Calling Buffer.fill() or Buffer.alloc() with some parameters can lead to a hang which could result in a Denial of Service. In order to address this vulnerability, the implementations of Buffer.alloc() and Buffer.fill() were updated so that they zero fill instead of hanging in these cases. All versions of Node.js 6.x (LTS "Boron"), 8.x (LTS "Carbon"), and 9.x are vulnerable. All versions of Node.js 10.x (Current) are NOT vulnerable.24d
CVE-2016-7247—
93.9%
——28——
CVE-2004-1907—
93.9%
——28——
CVE-2008-6843—
93.9%
——28——
CVE-2007-5636—
93.9%
——28——
CVE-2016-10081—
93.9%
——28——
CVE-2007-1916—
93.9%
——28——
CVE-2016-15042—
93.9%
——28——
CVE-2013-0429—
93.9%
——28——
CVE-2002-2295—
93.9%
——28——
CVE-2016-0937—
93.9%
——28——
CVE-2010-1405—
93.9%
——28——
CVE-2001-0534—
93.9%
——28——
CVE-2010-1400—
93.9%
——28——
CVE-2002-2190—
93.9%
——28——
CVE-2021-1636—
93.9%
——28——
CVE-2016-1997—
93.9%
——28——
CVE-2020-25705—
93.9%
——28——
CVE-2021-377147.5 HIG
93.9%
——28jsoup is a Java library for working with HTML. Those using jsoup versions prior to 1.14.2 to parse untrusted HTML or XML may be vulnerable to DOS attacks. If the parser is run on user supplied input, an attacker may supply content that causes the parser to get stuck (loop indefinitely until cancelled), to complete more slowly than usual, or to throw an unexpected exception. This effect may support a denial of service attack. The issue is patched in version 1.14.2. There are a few available workarounds. Users may rate limit input parsing, limit the size of inputs based on system resources, and/or implement thread watchdogs to cap and timeout parse runtimes.24d
CVE-2015-4473—
93.9%
——28——
CVE-2018-20235—
93.9%
——28——
CVE-2003-1227—
93.9%
——28——
CVE-2015-8432—
93.9%
——28——
CVE-2019-7231—
93.9%
——28——
CVE-2011-0558—
93.9%
——28——