Vulnerabilities exploitable today
376,337in current view
Single score combining CVSS, KEV membership and EPSS. Every CVE with its own record — timeline from publication to active exploitation.
In KEV catalog1,713
New KEV · 24H0
Exploit Today ≥ 701,646
Distribution · last window
- Critical2,383
- High8,771
- Medium6,812
- Low735
Filters
Window
Severity
Flags
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTitleMod.
CVE-2025-2086—29.0%
——9——CVE-2025-31805—29.0%
——9——CVE-2025-31733—29.0%
——9——CVE-2026-709318.1 HIG29.0%
——9Vulnerability in the Oracle Workflow product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Workflow Notification Mailer). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.15. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Workflow. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle Workflow accessible data and unauthorized ability to cause a hang or frequently repeatable crash (complete DOS) of Oracle Workflow. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.1 (Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H).20dCVE-2025-31803—29.0%
——9——CVE-2025-31847—29.0%
——9——CVE-2025-31770—29.0%
——9——CVE-2025-39514—29.0%
——9——CVE-2025-31783—29.0%
——9——CVE-2025-31731—29.0%
——9——CVE-2026-54518—29.0%
——9——CVE-2023-50316—29.0%
——9——CVE-2020-5827—29.0%
——9——CVE-2025-59273—29.0%
——9——CVE-2026-4581—29.0%
——9——CVE-2024-31084—29.0%
——9——CVE-2025-24657—29.0%
——9——CVE-2024-53818—29.0%
——9——CVE-2025-24634—29.0%
——9——CVE-2015-7052—29.0%
——9——CVE-2024-39178—29.0%
——9——CVE-2020-5830—29.0%
——9——CVE-2026-824738.2 HIG29.0%
——9KubeEdge CloudCore through 1.23.1 accepts node task status reports on its HTTPS server without authentication verification. Attackers can reach CloudCore on port 10002 to mark upgrade jobs as succeeded or failed, deceiving the control plane about node upgrade status and blocking further upgrade scheduling.17dCVE-2026-33191—29.0%
——9——CVE-2016-2941—29.0%
——9——CVE-2025-14356—29.0%
——9——CVE-2026-334443.7 LOW29.0%
——9CVE-2026-33444 is a memory management
vulnerability in Secure Access servers prior to 14.55. Attackers with intimate
knowledge of and total control over the tunnel protocol can create a
non-persistent DoS against the server.63dCVE-2026-673167.4 HIG29.0%
——9axios is vulnerable to read-side prototype-pollution gadgets that can alter request construction when Object.prototype has already been polluted by a separate vulnerability or dependency. In the bodyless method aliases (axios.get(), axios.delete(), axios.head(), axios.options()), inherited data is read via (config || {}).data before config normalization, causing an attacker-controlled body to be sent on requests that did not set one. Additional low-level paths, only reachable when calling exported adapters/helpers (e.g. lib/adapters/http.js, unsafe/helpers/resolveConfig.js) directly with plain configs and no own proxy or paramsSerializer, can inherit polluted proxy values (routing requests through an attacker-controlled proxy) or paramsSerializer values (attacker-controlled URL serialization). These low-level gadgets do not reproduce through normal high-level axios calls on 1.15.2+. The issue is fixed in axios 1.18.0 and 0.33.0.16dCVE-2025-62001—29.0%
——9——CVE-2015-2012—29.0%
——9——CVE-2015-5918—29.0%
——9——CVE-2015-5919—29.0%
——9——CVE-2023-28584—29.0%
——9——CVE-2026-643138.8 HIG29.0%
——9In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
crypto: ecc - Fix carry overflow in vli multiplication
The carry flag calculation fails when r01.m_high is saturated
(0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF) and addition of lower bits overflows.
The condition (r01.m_high < product.m_high) doesn't handle the case
where r01.m_high == product.m_high and an additional carry exists
from lower-bit overflow.
When commit 3c4b23901a0c ("crypto: ecdh - Add ECDH software support")
introduced crypto/ecc.c, it split the muladd() function in the
micro-ecc library into separate mul_64_64() and add_128_128() helpers.
It seems the check got lost in translation.
Add proper handling for this boundary by accounting for the carry
from the lower addition.14dCVE-2024-31110—29.0%
——9——CVE-2015-1142—29.0%
——9——CVE-2024-44903—29.0%
——9——CVE-2023-44198—29.0%
——9——CVE-2024-34380—29.0%
——9——CVE-2024-51434—29.0%
——9——