Vulnerabilities exploitable today
369,575in current view
Single score combining CVSS, KEV membership and EPSS. Every CVE with its own record — timeline from publication to active exploitation.
In KEV catalog1,695
New KEV · 24H0
Exploit Today ≥ 701,638
Distribution · last window
- Critical2,111
- High7,598
- Medium5,690
- Low556
Window
Severity
Flags
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTitleMod.
CVE-2026-460998.1 HIG21.1%
——6In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: ipv6: fix NOREF dst use in seg6 and rpl lwtunnels
seg6_input_core() and rpl_input() call ip6_route_input() which sets a
NOREF dst on the skb, then pass it to dst_cache_set_ip6() invoking
dst_hold() unconditionally.
On PREEMPT_RT, ksoftirqd is preemptible and a higher-priority task can
release the underlying pcpu_rt between the lookup and the caching
through a concurrent FIB lookup on a shared nexthop.
Simplified race sequence:
ksoftirqd/X higher-prio task (same CPU X)
----------- --------------------------------
seg6_input_core(,skb)/rpl_input(skb)
dst_cache_get()
-> miss
ip6_route_input(skb)
-> ip6_pol_route(,skb,flags)
[RT6_LOOKUP_F_DST_NOREF in flags]
-> FIB lookup resolves fib6_nh
[nhid=N route]
-> rt6_make_pcpu_route()
[creates pcpu_rt, refcount=1]
pcpu_rt->sernum = fib6_sernum
[fib6_sernum=W]
-> cmpxchg(fib6_nh.rt6i_pcpu,
NULL, pcpu_rt)
[slot was empty, store succeeds]
-> skb_dst_set_noref(skb, dst)
[dst is pcpu_rt, refcount still 1]
rt_genid_bump_ipv6()
-> bumps fib6_sernum
[fib6_sernum from W to Z]
ip6_route_output()
-> ip6_pol_route()
-> FIB lookup resolves fib6_nh
[nhid=N]
-> rt6_get_pcpu_route()
pcpu_rt->sernum != fib6_sernum
[W <> Z, stale]
-> prev = xchg(rt6i_pcpu, NULL)
-> dst_release(prev)
[prev is pcpu_rt,
refcount 1->0, dead]
dst = skb_dst(skb)
[dst is the dead pcpu_rt]
dst_cache_set_ip6(dst)
-> dst_hold() on dead dst
-> WARN / use-after-free
For the race to occur, ksoftirqd must be preemptible (PREEMPT_RT without
PREEMPT_RT_NEEDS_BH_LOCK) and a concurrent task must be able to release
the pcpu_rt. Shared nexthop objects provide such a path, as two routes
pointing to the same nhid share the same fib6_nh and its rt6i_pcpu
entry.
Fix seg6_input_core() and rpl_input() by calling skb_dst_force() after
ip6_route_input() to force the NOREF dst into a refcounted one before
caching.
The output path is not affected as ip6_route_output() already returns a
refcounted dst.4dCVE-2026-25154—21.1%
——6——CVE-2025-3488—21.1%
——6——CVE-2025-12006—21.1%
——6——CVE-2024-53757—21.1%
——6——CVE-2025-8538—21.1%
——6——CVE-2026-75829—21.1%
——6——CVE-2022-0480—21.1%
——6——CVE-2025-1408—21.1%
——6——CVE-2026-12205—21.1%
——6——CVE-2024-11897—21.1%
——6——CVE-2022-41634—21.1%
——6——CVE-2023-28144—21.1%
——6——CVE-2024-32572—21.1%
——6——CVE-2022-44740—21.1%
——6——CVE-2025-69292—21.1%
——6——CVE-2025-21494—21.1%
——6——CVE-2023-35120—21.1%
——6——CVE-2026-59240—21.1%
——6The vulnerability involves an Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) in the `DeleteNotificationController::delete()` method at endpoint `GET /notification/delete/{id}`. The flaw allows any authenticated user, regardless of company or permissions, to delete notifications belonging to any other user in the system. The controller retrieves the target record with `Notification::findOrFail($id)` and deletes it without validating `user_id` or `company_id` ownership, unlike the sibling `SetNotificationReadAjaxController`, which correctly scopes lookups by `Auth::id()`. Because notification identifiers are sequential, an attacker can iterate over IDs to systematically delete notifications belonging to any user, denying them visibility of ticket alerts, task assignments, and other system events.6dCVE-2025-22298—21.1%
——6——CVE-2024-32576—21.1%
——6——CVE-2026-18371—21.1%
——6HTML injection vulnerability in M-Files Web before 26.8.16330.2 allows an authenticated attacker to affect web user interface contents displayed to other users.7dCVE-2024-27025—21.1%
——6——CVE-2025-69293—21.1%
——6——CVE-2026-139966.5 MED21.1%
——6Inappropriate implementation in Permissions in Google Chrome prior to 150.0.7871.47 allowed a remote attacker to perform UI spoofing via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)68dCVE-2026-252129.9 CRI21.1%
——6An issue was discovered in Percona PMM before 3.7. Because an internal database user retains specific superuser privileges, an attacker with pmm-admin rights can abuse the "Add data source" feature to break out of the database context and execute shell commands on the underlying operating system.45dCVE-2025-52899—21.1%
——6——CVE-2024-6300—21.1%
——6——CVE-2024-36238—21.1%
——6——CVE-2024-40995—21.1%
——6——CVE-2021-2353—21.1%
——6——CVE-2024-22877—21.1%
——6——CVE-2024-13703—21.1%
——6——CVE-2023-29574—21.1%
——6——CVE-2025-46687—21.1%
——6——CVE-2025-31409—21.1%
——6——CVE-2023-533829.8 CRI21.1%
——6In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net/smc: Reset connection when trying to use SMCRv2 fails.
We found a crash when using SMCRv2 with 2 Mellanox ConnectX-4. It
can be reproduced by:
- smc_run nginx
- smc_run wrk -t 32 -c 500 -d 30 http://<ip>:<port>
BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000014
#PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
#PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
PGD 8000000108713067 P4D 8000000108713067 PUD 151127067 PMD 0
Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI
CPU: 4 PID: 2441 Comm: kworker/4:249 Kdump: loaded Tainted: G W E 6.4.0-rc1+ #42
Workqueue: smc_hs_wq smc_listen_work [smc]
RIP: 0010:smc_clc_send_confirm_accept+0x284/0x580 [smc]
RSP: 0018:ffffb8294b2d7c78 EFLAGS: 00010a06
RAX: ffff8f1873238880 RBX: ffffb8294b2d7dc8 RCX: 0000000000000000
RDX: 00000000000000b4 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: 0000000000b40c00
RBP: ffffb8294b2d7db8 R08: ffff8f1815c5860c R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000400 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff8f1846f56180
R13: ffff8f1815c5860c R14: 0000000000000001 R15: 0000000000000001
FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8f1aefd00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 0000000000000014 CR3: 00000001027a0001 CR4: 00000000003706e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
<TASK>
? mlx5_ib_map_mr_sg+0xa1/0xd0 [mlx5_ib]
? smcr_buf_map_link+0x24b/0x290 [smc]
? __smc_buf_create+0x4ee/0x9b0 [smc]
smc_clc_send_accept+0x4c/0xb0 [smc]
smc_listen_work+0x346/0x650 [smc]
? __schedule+0x279/0x820
process_one_work+0x1e5/0x3f0
worker_thread+0x4d/0x2f0
? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10
kthread+0xe5/0x120
? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x50
</TASK>
During the CLC handshake, server sequentially tries available SMCRv2
and SMCRv1 devices in smc_listen_work().
If an SMCRv2 device is found. SMCv2 based link group and link will be
assigned to the connection. Then assumed that some buffer assignment
errors happen later in the CLC handshake, such as RMB registration
failure, server will give up SMCRv2 and try SMCRv1 device instead. But
the resources assigned to the connection won't be reset.
When server tries SMCRv1 device, the connection creation process will
be executed again. Since conn->lnk has been assigned when trying SMCRv2,
it will not be set to the correct SMCRv1 link in
smcr_lgr_conn_assign_link(). So in such situation, conn->lgr points to
correct SMCRv1 link group but conn->lnk points to the SMCRv2 link
mistakenly.
Then in smc_clc_send_confirm_accept(), conn->rmb_desc->mr[link->link_idx]
will be accessed. Since the link->link_idx is not correct, the related
MR may not have been initialized, so crash happens.
| Try SMCRv2 device first
| |-> conn->lgr: assign existed SMCRv2 link group;
| |-> conn->link: assign existed SMCRv2 link (link_idx may be 1 in SMC_LGR_SYMMETRIC);
| |-> sndbuf & RMB creation fails, quit;
|
| Try SMCRv1 device then
| |-> conn->lgr: create SMCRv1 link group and assign;
| |-> conn->link: keep SMCRv2 link mistakenly;
| |-> sndbuf & RMB creation succeed, only RMB->mr[link_idx = 0]
| initialized.
|
| Then smc_clc_send_confirm_accept() accesses
| conn->rmb_desc->mr[conn->link->link_idx, which is 1], then crash.
v
This patch tries to fix this by cleaning conn->lnk before assigning
link. In addition, it is better to reset the connection and clean the
resources assigned if trying SMCRv2 failed in buffer creation or
registration.34dCVE-2022-40695—21.1%
——6——CVE-2026-820728.8 HIG21.1%
——6Out of bounds read in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 151.0.7922.72 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)10dCVE-2024-11782—21.1%
——6——