Vulnerabilities exploitable today
369,233in current view
Single score combining CVSS, KEV membership and EPSS. Every CVE with its own record — timeline from publication to active exploitation.
In KEV catalog1,695
New KEV · 24H0
Exploit Today ≥ 701,636
Distribution · last window
- Critical2,158
- High7,687
- Medium5,628
- Low537
Window
Severity
Flags
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTitleMod.
CVE-2026-139316.5 MED19.9%
——6Inappropriate implementation in Media in Google Chrome on Windows prior to 150.0.7871.47 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to perform UI spoofing via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)66dCVE-2026-709075.3 MED19.9%
——6Vulnerability in the Oracle Java SE, Oracle GraalVM for JDK, Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition product of Oracle Java SE (component: JSSE). Supported versions that are affected are Oracle Java SE: 8u501, 11.0.32, 17.0.20, 21.0.12, 25.0.4, 26.0.2; Oracle GraalVM for JDK: 17.0.20 and 21.0.12; Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition: 21.3.19. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via TLS to compromise Oracle Java SE, Oracle GraalVM for JDK, Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of Oracle Java SE, Oracle GraalVM for JDK, Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition. Note: This vulnerability can only be exploited by supplying data to APIs in the specified Component without using Untrusted Java Web Start applications or Untrusted Java applets, such as through a web service. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 5.3 (Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L).16dCVE-2026-471307.1 HIG19.9%
——6NextCRM is open-source customer relationship management (CRM) software. Versions prior to 0.12.0 have a Broken Object Level Authorization (BOLA/IDOR) vulnerability exists in the CRM contact and target update endpoints. The application fails to verify if the authenticated user has ownership of the specific resource being modified. This allows any authenticated user (even with a standard `member` role) to arbitrarily modify sensitive CRM contacts and targets belonging to other users or organizations (cross-tenant data tampering). Version 0.12.0 fixes the issue.45dCVE-2022-34893—19.9%
——6——CVE-2025-24443—19.9%
——6——CVE-2026-32326—19.9%
——6——CVE-2022-49546—19.9%
——6——CVE-2026-189337.2 HIG19.9%
——6The wp-downloadmanager WordPress plugin, in version 1.68.11 (also affecting the 6.9.4 release line), allows an admin-privileged user (current_user_can('manage_downloads')) to upload arbitrary files via download-add.php with no extension or MIME-type validation of any kind - no wp_check_filetype_and_ext, no validate_file, and no extension blocklist exist anywhere in the upload handler.10dCVE-2025-220868.8 HIG19.9%
——6In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
RDMA/mlx5: Fix mlx5_poll_one() cur_qp update flow
When cur_qp isn't NULL, in order to avoid fetching the QP from
the radix tree again we check if the next cqe QP is identical to
the one we already have.
The bug however is that we are checking if the QP is identical by
checking the QP number inside the CQE against the QP number inside the
mlx5_ib_qp, but that's wrong since the QP number from the CQE is from
FW so it should be matched against mlx5_core_qp which is our FW QP
number.
Otherwise we could use the wrong QP when handling a CQE which could
cause the kernel trace below.
This issue is mainly noticeable over QPs 0 & 1, since for now they are
the only QPs in our driver whereas the QP number inside mlx5_ib_qp
doesn't match the QP number inside mlx5_core_qp.
BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000012
#PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
#PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
PGD 0 P4D 0
Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 7927 Comm: kworker/u62:1 Not tainted 6.14.0-rc3+ #189
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.16.3-0-ga6ed6b701f0a-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
Workqueue: ib-comp-unb-wq ib_cq_poll_work [ib_core]
RIP: 0010:mlx5_ib_poll_cq+0x4c7/0xd90 [mlx5_ib]
Code: 03 00 00 8d 58 ff 21 cb 66 39 d3 74 39 48 c7 c7 3c 89 6e a0 0f b7 db e8 b7 d2 b3 e0 49 8b 86 60 03 00 00 48 c7 c7 4a 89 6e a0 <0f> b7 5c 98 02 e8 9f d2 b3 e0 41 0f b7 86 78 03 00 00 83 e8 01 21
RSP: 0018:ffff88810511bd60 EFLAGS: 00010046
RAX: 0000000000000010 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000000
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff88885fa1b3c0 RDI: ffffffffa06e894a
RBP: 00000000000000b0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff88810511bc10
R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff88810d593000
R13: ffff88810e579108 R14: ffff888105146000 R15: 00000000000000b0
FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88885fa00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 0000000000000012 CR3: 00000001077e6001 CR4: 0000000000370eb0
Call Trace:
<TASK>
? __die+0x20/0x60
? page_fault_oops+0x150/0x3e0
? exc_page_fault+0x74/0x130
? asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30
? mlx5_ib_poll_cq+0x4c7/0xd90 [mlx5_ib]
__ib_process_cq+0x5a/0x150 [ib_core]
ib_cq_poll_work+0x31/0x90 [ib_core]
process_one_work+0x169/0x320
worker_thread+0x288/0x3a0
? work_busy+0xb0/0xb0
kthread+0xd7/0x1f0
? kthreads_online_cpu+0x130/0x130
? kthreads_online_cpu+0x130/0x130
ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x50
? kthreads_online_cpu+0x130/0x130
ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20
</TASK>38dCVE-2025-4590—19.9%
——6——CVE-2026-44719—19.9%
——6——CVE-2024-8473—19.9%
——6——CVE-2023-32273—19.9%
——6——CVE-2026-139856.5 MED19.9%
——6Inappropriate implementation in MediaCapture in Google Chrome prior to 150.0.7871.47 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to perform UI spoofing via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)65dCVE-2026-281118.8 HIG19.9%
——6Contributor Privilege Escalation in Forminator <= 1.56.0 versions.24dCVE-2026-637614.3 MED19.9%
——6SurrealDB before 3.1.0 silently substitutes the ES384 algorithm when a JWT access method is configured with ALGORITHM ES512 (DEFINE ACCESS ... TYPE JWT ALGORITHM ES512), because the underlying jsonwebtoken crate (v10.x) has no ES512 variant and the mapping defaults to ES384 without any error, warning, or log message. Users who supply the correct P-521 key for ES512 experience authentication handshake failures due to the curve mismatch with ES384 (which expects P-384), and tokens are rejected by external systems expecting genuine ES512 signatures. The flaw cannot be used to forge tokens or compromise data confidentiality or integrity, as ES384 remains cryptographically strong.45dCVE-2025-10748—19.9%
——6——CVE-2018-4051—19.9%
——6——CVE-2025-2225—19.9%
——6——CVE-2025-22963—19.9%
——6——CVE-2025-31726—19.9%
——6——CVE-2022-49715—19.9%
——6——CVE-2024-44273—19.9%
——6——CVE-2024-54197—19.9%
——6——CVE-2026-466797.5 HIG19.9%
——6libp2p is a JavaScript Implementation of libp2p networking stack. Prior to version 15.0.23, three cooperating omissions in @libp2p/gossipsub allow an unauthenticated single peer to exhaust the Node.js heap of any gossipsub node with default options. This issue has been patched in version 15.0.23.44dCVE-2025-10660—19.9%
——6——CVE-2020-1836—19.9%
——6——CVE-2010-1973—19.9%
——6——CVE-2024-52919—19.9%
——6——CVE-2022-40884—19.9%
——6——CVE-2024-2537—19.9%
——6——CVE-2024-39752—19.9%
——6——CVE-2026-197688.1 HIG19.9%
——6Improper control of generation of code ('Code Injection') in the settings feature in Devolutions PowerShell Universal 2026.2.3 and earlier allows an authenticated user with settings management permission to execute arbitrary PowerShell code via a crafted setting value that is not properly escaped when written to the settings configuration file.8dCVE-2026-54768—19.9%
——6WPGraphQL provides a GraphQL API for WordPress sites. From 2.0.0 until 2.15.1, the deprecated user field on SendPasswordResetEmailPayload lets an unauthenticated caller distinguish existing author-class accounts through the sendPasswordResetEmail mutation and obtain public profile fields. This issue is fixed in version 2.15.1.33dCVE-2025-64100—19.9%
——6——CVE-2026-44718—19.9%
——6——CVE-2024-409097.8 HIG19.9%
——6In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
bpf: Fix a potential use-after-free in bpf_link_free()
After commit 1a80dbcb2dba, bpf_link can be freed by
link->ops->dealloc_deferred, but the code still tests and uses
link->ops->dealloc afterward, which leads to a use-after-free as
reported by syzbot. Actually, one of them should be sufficient, so
just call one of them instead of both. Also add a WARN_ON() in case
of any problematic implementation.32dCVE-2026-22878—19.9%
——6——CVE-2021-30908—19.9%
——6——CVE-2021-47743—19.9%
——6——