PULSE
FEED
ransombraincipher reclama a fbc.ca · CA · Financial Servicesransombraincipher reclama a hamiltonhealthcenter.com · CA · Healthcareransomplay reclama a Aripack · AR · Manufacturingransomplay reclama a StrucSure Home Warranty · US · Financial Servicesransomplay reclama a Standard Sand & Silica · US · Manufacturingransomplay reclama a Misura · CA · Technologyransomplay reclama a AVIR · Technologyransomwhitearmor reclama a Unilever · GB · Manufacturingransomsilentransomgroup reclama a W... G...ransomdark project reclama a Homestead Creamery · US · Agriculture and Food Productionransomdark project reclama a Food Bank of Central Louisiana · US · Agriculture and Food Productionransomdark project reclama a Simplehuman · US · Retail & E-Commerceransombraincipher reclama a hhjcpa.com · US · Professional Servicesransombraincipher reclama a prairieridge.net · US · Agriculture and Food Productionransombraincipher reclama a fbc.ca · CA · Financial Servicesransombraincipher reclama a hamiltonhealthcenter.com · CA · Healthcareransomplay reclama a Aripack · AR · Manufacturingransomplay reclama a StrucSure Home Warranty · US · Financial Servicesransomplay reclama a Standard Sand & Silica · US · Manufacturingransomplay reclama a Misura · CA · Technologyransomplay reclama a AVIR · Technologyransomwhitearmor reclama a Unilever · GB · Manufacturingransomsilentransomgroup reclama a W... G...ransomdark project reclama a Homestead Creamery · US · Agriculture and Food Productionransomdark project reclama a Food Bank of Central Louisiana · US · Agriculture and Food Productionransomdark project reclama a Simplehuman · US · Retail & E-Commerceransombraincipher reclama a hhjcpa.com · US · Professional Servicesransombraincipher reclama a prairieridge.net · US · Agriculture and Food Production
CVE Watch407,950 in full archive

Vulnerabilities exploitable today

407,950in current view

Single score combining CVSS, KEV membership and EPSS. Every CVE with its own record — timeline from publication to active exploitation.

In KEV catalog1,767
New KEV · 24H0
Exploit Today ≥ 701,698

Distribution · last window

  • Critical
    5,766
  • High
    22,444
  • Medium
    20,914
  • Low
    2,192
Filters
Filters

Window

Severity

Flags

Vulnerabilities30,041–30,080 · 407,950
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTitleMod.
CVE-2013-0623—
92.6%
——28——
CVE-2008-2785—
92.6%
——28——
CVE-2017-8504—
92.6%
——28——
CVE-2006-0265—
92.6%
——28——
CVE-2018-0885—
92.6%
——28——
CVE-2018-16083—
92.6%
——28——
CVE-2012-3941—
92.6%
——28——
CVE-2002-0028—
92.6%
——28——
CVE-2009-0841—
92.6%
——28——
CVE-2022-30556—
92.6%
——28——
CVE-2010-0447—
92.5%
——28——
CVE-2024-10660—
92.6%
——28——
CVE-2015-0307—
92.6%
——28——
CVE-2024-38085—
92.6%
——28——
CVE-2009-0840—
92.6%
——28——
CVE-2007-3792—
92.6%
——28——
CVE-2015-8560—
92.6%
——28——
CVE-2019-7226—
92.6%
——28——
CVE-2010-3636—
92.6%
——28——
CVE-2006-3710—
92.6%
——28——
CVE-2008-2829—
92.6%
——28——
CVE-2001-1314—
92.6%
——28——
CVE-2019-99476.1 MED
92.6%
——28An issue was discovered in urllib2 in Python 2.x through 2.7.16 and urllib in Python 3.x through 3.7.3. CRLF injection is possible if the attacker controls a url parameter, as demonstrated by the first argument to urllib.request.urlopen with \r\n (specifically in the path component of a URL that lacks a ? character) followed by an HTTP header or a Redis command. This is similar to the CVE-2019-9740 query string issue. This is fixed in: v2.7.17, v2.7.17rc1, v2.7.18, v2.7.18rc1; v3.5.10, v3.5.10rc1, v3.5.8, v3.5.8rc1, v3.5.8rc2, v3.5.9; v3.6.10, v3.6.10rc1, v3.6.11, v3.6.11rc1, v3.6.12, v3.6.9, v3.6.9rc1; v3.7.4, v3.7.4rc1, v3.7.4rc2, v3.7.5, v3.7.5rc1, v3.7.6, v3.7.6rc1, v3.7.7, v3.7.7rc1, v3.7.8, v3.7.8rc1, v3.7.9.22d
CVE-2010-1120—
92.6%
——28——
CVE-2013-0620—
92.6%
——28——
CVE-2009-0981—
92.6%
——28——
CVE-2002-1272—
92.6%
——28——
CVE-2008-4247—
92.6%
——28——
CVE-2017-8980—
92.6%
——28——
CVE-2015-8799—
92.6%
——28——
CVE-2015-0813—
92.6%
——28——
CVE-2021-21783—
92.6%
——28——
CVE-2020-10215—
92.6%
——28——
CVE-2009-3072—
92.6%
——28——
CVE-2004-0635—
92.6%
——28——
CVE-2007-6324—
92.6%
——28——
CVE-2023-36346—
92.6%
——28——
CVE-2002-0405—
92.6%
——28——
CVE-2013-5590—
92.5%
——28——
CVE-2012-4432—
92.5%
——28——