Vulnerabilities exploitable today
366,836in current view
Single score combining CVSS, KEV membership and EPSS. Every CVE with its own record — timeline from publication to active exploitation.
In KEV catalog1,685
New KEV · 24H0
Exploit Today ≥ 701,629
Distribution · last window
- Critical2,307
- High9,485
- Medium5,351
- Low516
Window
Severity
Flags
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTitleMod.
CVE-2025-11717—16.1%
——5——CVE-2024-11420—16.1%
——5——CVE-2025-25019—16.1%
——5——CVE-2026-142377.2 HIG16.1%
——5The vitepos WordPress plugin before 3.6.0, Vitepos WordPress plugin before 3.5.0 do not perform a per-target authorization check in their point-of-sale password-reset API and grant the custom Outlet Manager role an over-broad password-reset capability by default, allowing an Outlet Manager to reset any user's password, including an administrator's, and take over the account.3dCVE-2023-4318—16.1%
——5——CVE-2024-421097.8 HIG16.1%
——5In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
netfilter: nf_tables: unconditionally flush pending work before notifier
syzbot reports:
KASAN: slab-uaf in nft_ctx_update include/net/netfilter/nf_tables.h:1831
KASAN: slab-uaf in nft_commit_release net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c:9530
KASAN: slab-uaf int nf_tables_trans_destroy_work+0x152b/0x1750 net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c:9597
Read of size 2 at addr ffff88802b0051c4 by task kworker/1:1/45
[..]
Workqueue: events nf_tables_trans_destroy_work
Call Trace:
nft_ctx_update include/net/netfilter/nf_tables.h:1831 [inline]
nft_commit_release net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c:9530 [inline]
nf_tables_trans_destroy_work+0x152b/0x1750 net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c:9597
Problem is that the notifier does a conditional flush, but its possible
that the table-to-be-removed is still referenced by transactions being
processed by the worker, so we need to flush unconditionally.
We could make the flush_work depend on whether we found a table to delete
in nf-next to avoid the flush for most cases.
AFAICS this problem is only exposed in nf-next, with
commit e169285f8c56 ("netfilter: nf_tables: do not store nft_ctx in transaction objects"),
with this commit applied there is an unconditional fetch of
table->family which is whats triggering the above splat.25dCVE-2024-565577.8 HIG16.1%
——5In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
iio: adc: ad7923: Fix buffer overflow for tx_buf and ring_xfer
The AD7923 was updated to support devices with 8 channels, but the size
of tx_buf and ring_xfer was not increased accordingly, leading to a
potential buffer overflow in ad7923_update_scan_mode().25dCVE-2025-44134—16.1%
——5——CVE-2026-704673.8 LOW16.1%
——5A server-side request forgery (ssrf) vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSIEM 7.5.0, FortiSIEM 7.4.0 through 7.4.2, FortiSIEM 7.3.0 through 7.3.5, FortiSIEM 7.2 all versions, FortiSIEM 7.1 all versions, FortiSIEM 7.0 all versions, FortiSIEM 6.7 all versions, FortiSIEM 6.6 all versions, FortiSIEM 6.5 all versions may allow attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via <insert attack vector here>3dCVE-2025-52802—16.1%
——5——CVE-2024-33118—16.1%
——5——CVE-2023-54332—16.1%
——5——CVE-2026-75096.4 MED16.1%
——5The KIA Subtitle plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's `the-subtitle` shortcode `before` and `after` attributes in all versions up to, and including, 4.0.1. This is due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page.37dCVE-2024-34825—16.1%
——5——CVE-2025-49329—16.1%
——5——CVE-2024-34823—16.1%
——5——CVE-2025-11370—16.1%
——5——CVE-2026-34186—16.1%
——5——CVE-2024-50665—16.1%
——5——CVE-2026-34245—16.1%
——5——CVE-2025-49990—16.1%
——5——CVE-2024-41777—16.1%
——5——CVE-2025-13841—16.1%
——5——CVE-2024-40816—16.1%
——5——CVE-2024-6154—16.1%
——5——CVE-2026-24559—16.1%
——5——CVE-2026-645868.8 HIG16.1%
——5In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
wifi: brcmfmac: drain bus_reset work on device removal
brcmf_fw_crashed() and the debugfs "reset" entry both schedule
drvr->bus_reset, whose callback recovers drvr through container_of()
and dereferences it. The removal path frees drvr (brcmf_free ->
wiphy_free) without draining the work, so a bus_reset callback pending
or running during removal can outlive drvr.
Cancellation cannot live in brcmf_detach() or brcmf_free(): the work
callback reaches teardown through the bus .reset op (PCIe
brcmf_pcie_reset -> brcmf_detach; SDIO brcmf_sdio_bus_reset ->
brcmf_sdiod_remove -> brcmf_free), so cancelling there would wait for
the running work and deadlock.
Add a per-bus mutex (bus_reset_lock) and route all arming through
brcmf_bus_schedule_reset(), which under the lock skips when the bus is
marked removing. Each bus remove entry calls
brcmf_bus_cancel_reset_work(), which under the same lock sets removing
and cancels the work. Holding the mutex across cancel_work_sync() makes
the set-removing + drain step atomic. Every producer reaches the arming
path from process context -- the PCIe firmware-halt notification runs in
the threaded IRQ handler (brcmf_pcie_isr_thread) and the SDIO hostmail
path runs from the data workqueue -- so the mutex is taken only in
sleepable contexts. Where applicable the remove entry first stops the
firmware-crash producer: on PCIe mask the mailbox and synchronize_irq;
on SDIO unregister the bus interrupt and cancel the data worker, which
also reports firmware halts through brcmf_fw_crashed(). The mutex is
initialized at bus allocation. The SDIO suspend power-off path frees
drvr through the same brcmf_sdiod_remove() and takes the same lock;
resume re-allows the work only on a successful re-probe.
Also guard brcmf_fw_crashed() against a NULL bus_if/drvr: it can fire
before brcmf_attach() wires up drvr, and it dereferences drvr
(bphy_err/brcmf_dev_coredump) before reaching the arming gate.
The bus_reset work is shared across buses, so the drain is applied to
every remove path: PCIe (the .reset op introduced by the Fixes commit),
SDIO (arms the same work through brcmf_fw_crashed()), and USB (via the
debugfs "reset" entry). cancel_work_sync() drains a running or pending
bus_reset work item before removal frees drvr, and patch 1/2 makes the
scratch-buffer release safe when reset teardown has already released
those DMA buffers.
This patch fixes the lifetime of the bus_reset work item itself. It does
not attempt to address the separate, pre-existing lifetime of the
asynchronous firmware completion started by the PCIe reset path. That
callback needs its own lifetime/ownership protocol and is being tracked
separately.
This issue was found by an in-house static analysis tool.6dCVE-2026-187214.3 MED16.1%
——5A vulnerability has been found in kalcaddle kodbox 1.67 Build 02. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /user/sso/apiLogin of the component SSO API Login. The manipulation of the argument callbackUrl leads to open redirect. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.17dCVE-2021-46981—16.1%
——5——CVE-2026-75846—16.1%
——5——CVE-2026-625323.8 LOW16.1%
——5Vulnerability in the Oracle Hyperion Calculation Manager product of Oracle Hyperion (component: Security). The supported version that is affected is 11.2.25.0.000. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with network access via SQL to compromise Oracle Hyperion Calculation Manager. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle Hyperion Calculation Manager accessible data as well as unauthorized read access to a subset of Oracle Hyperion Calculation Manager accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 3.8 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N).4dCVE-2025-49987—16.1%
——5——CVE-2020-1878—16.1%
——5——CVE-2025-31344—16.1%
——5——CVE-2020-7259—16.1%
——5——CVE-2022-32835—16.1%
——5——CVE-2022-3500—16.1%
——5——CVE-2021-36169—16.1%
——5——CVE-2023-3356—16.1%
——5——CVE-2025-14145—16.1%
——5——