Vulnerabilities exploitable today
364,588in current view
Single score combining CVSS, KEV membership and EPSS. Every CVE with its own record — timeline from publication to active exploitation.
In KEV catalog1,675
New KEV · 24H0
Exploit Today ≥ 701,620
Distribution · last window
- Critical2,394
- High10,137
- Medium5,050
- Low465
Window
Severity
Flags
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTitleMod.
CVE-2024-52343—13.7%
——4——CVE-2023-533158.8 HIG13.7%
——4In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
wifi: ath11k: Fix SKB corruption in REO destination ring
While running traffics for a long time, randomly an RX descriptor
filled with value "0" from REO destination ring is received.
This descriptor which is invalid causes the wrong SKB (SKB stored in
the IDR lookup with buffer id "0") to be fetched which in turn
causes SKB memory corruption issue and the same leads to crash
after some time.
Changed the start id for idr allocation to "1" and the buffer id "0"
is reserved for error validation. Introduced Sanity check to validate
the descriptor, before processing the SKB.
Crash Signature :
Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 3f004900
PC points to "b15_dma_inv_range+0x30/0x50"
LR points to "dma_cache_maint_page+0x8c/0x128".
The Backtrace obtained is as follows:
[<8031716c>] (b15_dma_inv_range) from [<80313a4c>] (dma_cache_maint_page+0x8c/0x128)
[<80313a4c>] (dma_cache_maint_page) from [<80313b90>] (__dma_page_dev_to_cpu+0x28/0xcc)
[<80313b90>] (__dma_page_dev_to_cpu) from [<7fb5dd68>] (ath11k_dp_process_rx+0x1e8/0x4a4 [ath11k])
[<7fb5dd68>] (ath11k_dp_process_rx [ath11k]) from [<7fb53c20>] (ath11k_dp_service_srng+0xb0/0x2ac [ath11k])
[<7fb53c20>] (ath11k_dp_service_srng [ath11k]) from [<7f67bba4>] (ath11k_pci_ext_grp_napi_poll+0x1c/0x78 [ath11k_pci])
[<7f67bba4>] (ath11k_pci_ext_grp_napi_poll [ath11k_pci]) from [<807d5cf4>] (__napi_poll+0x28/0xb8)
[<807d5cf4>] (__napi_poll) from [<807d5f28>] (net_rx_action+0xf0/0x280)
[<807d5f28>] (net_rx_action) from [<80302148>] (__do_softirq+0xd0/0x280)
[<80302148>] (__do_softirq) from [<80320408>] (irq_exit+0x74/0xd4)
[<80320408>] (irq_exit) from [<803638a4>] (__handle_domain_irq+0x90/0xb4)
[<803638a4>] (__handle_domain_irq) from [<805bedec>] (gic_handle_irq+0x58/0x90)
[<805bedec>] (gic_handle_irq) from [<80301a78>] (__irq_svc+0x58/0x8c)
Tested-on: IPQ8074 hw2.0 AHB WLAN.HK.2.7.0.1-01744-QCAHKSWPL_SILICONZ-122dCVE-2022-20734—13.7%
——4——CVE-2026-46770—13.7%
——4——CVE-2024-51933—13.7%
——4——CVE-2026-126215.4 MED13.7%
——4Improper neutralization of input during web page generation XSS
vulnerability in the GridTime 3000 (password reset form) allows XSS.
This issue affects GridTime 3000: from 1.0r0.03 before 1.2r0.0.47dCVE-2024-51934—13.7%
——4——CVE-2025-363235.4 MED13.7%
——4IBM watsonx.data intelligence 5.2.0, 5.2.1, 5.2.2, 5.3.0 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows an authenticated user to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session.50dCVE-2025-397508.8 HIG13.7%
——4In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
wifi: ath12k: Correct tid cleanup when tid setup fails
Currently, if any error occurs during ath12k_dp_rx_peer_tid_setup(),
the tid value is already incremented, even though the corresponding
TID is not actually allocated. Proceed to
ath12k_dp_rx_peer_tid_delete() starting from unallocated tid,
which might leads to freeing unallocated TID and cause potential
crash or out-of-bounds access.
Hence, fix by correctly decrementing tid before cleanup to match only
the successfully allocated TIDs.
Also, remove tid-- from failure case of ath12k_dp_rx_peer_frag_setup(),
as decrementing the tid before cleanup in loop will take care of this.
Compile tested only.27dCVE-2024-52345—13.7%
——4——CVE-2024-53741—13.7%
——4——CVE-2020-12894—13.7%
——4——CVE-2026-1090—13.7%
——4——CVE-2023-52457—13.7%
——4——CVE-2026-1706—13.7%
——4——CVE-2025-61818—13.7%
——4——CVE-2025-22245—13.7%
——4——CVE-2025-61817—13.7%
——4——CVE-2024-267867.8 HIG13.7%
——4In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
iommufd: Fix iopt_access_list_id overwrite bug
Syzkaller reported the following WARN_ON:
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 4738 at drivers/iommu/iommufd/io_pagetable.c:1360
Call Trace:
iommufd_access_change_ioas+0x2fe/0x4e0
iommufd_access_destroy_object+0x50/0xb0
iommufd_object_remove+0x2a3/0x490
iommufd_object_destroy_user
iommufd_access_destroy+0x71/0xb0
iommufd_test_staccess_release+0x89/0xd0
__fput+0x272/0xb50
__fput_sync+0x4b/0x60
__do_sys_close
__se_sys_close
__x64_sys_close+0x8b/0x110
do_syscall_x64
The mismatch between the access pointer in the list and the passed-in
pointer is resulting from an overwrite of access->iopt_access_list_id, in
iopt_add_access(). Called from iommufd_access_change_ioas() when
xa_alloc() succeeds but iopt_calculate_iova_alignment() fails.
Add a new_id in iopt_add_access() and only update iopt_access_list_id when
returning successfully.22dCVE-2021-47268—13.7%
——4——CVE-2025-54081—13.7%
——4——CVE-2025-10651—13.7%
——4——CVE-2026-22028—13.7%
——4——CVE-2022-49534—13.7%
——4——CVE-2025-61834—13.7%
——4——CVE-2023-524837.8 HIG13.7%
——4In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mctp: perform route lookups under a RCU read-side lock
Our current route lookups (mctp_route_lookup and mctp_route_lookup_null)
traverse the net's route list without the RCU read lock held. This means
the route lookup is subject to preemption, resulting in an potential
grace period expiry, and so an eventual kfree() while we still have the
route pointer.
Add the proper read-side critical section locks around the route
lookups, preventing premption and a possible parallel kfree.
The remaining net->mctp.routes accesses are already under a
rcu_read_lock, or protected by the RTNL for updates.
Based on an analysis from Sili Luo <rootlab@huawei.com>, where
introducing a delay in the route lookup could cause a UAF on
simultaneous sendmsg() and route deletion.22dCVE-2026-54302—13.7%
——4——CVE-2024-50009—13.7%
——4——CVE-2024-47115—13.7%
——4——CVE-2026-42646—13.7%
——4——CVE-2024-52339—13.7%
——4——CVE-2024-56583—13.7%
——4——CVE-2024-52340—13.7%
——4——CVE-2024-52341—13.7%
——4——CVE-2024-2104—13.7%
——4——CVE-2021-47306—13.7%
——4——CVE-2024-46732—13.7%
——4——CVE-2024-51936—13.7%
——4——CVE-2024-52342—13.7%
——4——CVE-2024-51931—13.7%
——4——